Pixel Tracker

Sunday, February 17 , 2019, 3:26 pm | Partly Cloudy 56º

 
 
 
 

Golden State Water Customers Protest Proposed Rate Increases at Santa Maria Meeting

Orcutt resident Ishmael Martinez objects to proposed Golden State Water Co. rate increases during a California Public Utilities Commission meeting Tuesday in Santa Maria. Click to view larger
Orcutt resident Ishmael Martinez objects to proposed Golden State Water Co. rate increases during a California Public Utilities Commission meeting Tuesday in Santa Maria. (April Charlton / Noozhawk photo)

Golden State Water Co. customers packed Shepard Hall at the Santa Maria Public Library Tuesday night to voice their collective dismay with a proposal to raise their rates by nearly 20 percent starting next year.

The Santa Maria service area targeted for the rate increase includes Orcutt, Sisquoc and other areas of unincorporated northern Santa Barbara County, as well as Los Osos and the Edna Valley area in neighboring San Luis Obispo County.

If approved by the California Public Utilities Commission, the average water bill for residents served by the private water company would increase by an average $10.45 a month for individuals in the Orcutt area and $9.81 for Los Osos customers.

The proposed increase would be phased in over three years, with increases of 19.15-percent planned for 2019, another 3.1-percent in 2020 and a 3.89-percent hike in 2021.

More than 40 community members attended the meeting and most of them told administrative law judge Gerald Kelly, who presided over the hearing, the proposed rate hike was cost prohibitive and equated to a pay increase for Golden State Water Co. executives.

Golden State Water filed an application with the CPUC in July 2017 to increase rates for all of its service areas in the state beginning Jan. 1, 2019.

The CPUC is responsible for determining whether the proposed rate hike is fair to consumers. A decision is expected to be announced in December.

Golden State Water said in its application that of the additional $55 million the rate increase is expected to generate, $2 million of it will be used for performance compensation for company executives, and that’s not sitting well with customers.

“Company salary is the performance compensation,” said customer Gerald Trimble, who also balked at a plan to use $650,000 of the expected revenue for a system that allows customers to pay bills by credit card. 

“We are talking about profit here for Golden State Water,” Los Osos resident Peter Bressler echoed, calling the proposed rate hike exorbitant and unaffordable.

“We shouldn’t be looking at rate increases. We should be looking at rollbacks.”

Bressler said any increases should be passed on to the company’s shareholders and not its customers, who were hit with a rate increase this past year that was approved in July 2014 but didn’t go into effect until April 2017.

“It amounts to a denial of service,” Bressler added.

Golden State Water Co. Regulatory Affairs Manager Jon Pierotti said the company bases its rate increases on the needs of customers in a specific area, such as the Santa Maria service area, where revenue from the proposed rate hike is slated for infrastructure.

California Public Utilities Commission administrative law judge Gerald Kelly listens to public testimony during a Santa Maria meeting Tuesday. Click to view larger
California Public Utilities Commission administrative law judge Gerald Kelly listens to public testimony during a Santa Maria meeting Tuesday. (April Charlton / Noozhawk photo)

Around $23 million of the rate increase revenues would be used for capital improvements to the water system, Pierotti said, including $6.5 million for aging pipelines and $12 million for water supply.

He added that, as the company upgrades its infrastructure, the amount of federal income tax it must pay also increases.

“These are two of the more significant factors that have contributed to the rate increase,” Pierotti told the packed room.

Edna Valley resident Doug Stevens acknowledged Golden State Water has made strides in water reliability in the last decade, but said water costs at his 2,100-square-foot home he shares with his wife are getting to high to bear.

“I’m just dying with my water costs,” Stevens said, noting his bills have increased during times of conservation. “It’s really unbelievable. It’s eating our house alive.”

He, too, believes there are better ways for Golden State Water to generate revenues than implementing high rate increases, and urged the CPUC to require the water company to study other options before granting a rate hike.

“You can’t simply continue to pass the burden to we, the consumer,” Stevens said, adding residents in Edna Valley that have acre or more of land can legally drill wells for water supply, which many are considering as water rates continue to skyrocket.

Orcutt newcomer Ishmael Martinez was the last speaker of the night and said he may not be able to afford the proposed rate hike, and feels rates are already too high, especially when he’s conserving as much water as possible.

“My whole lawn is gone. I don’t have a front lawn and I am getting rid of my back lawn because of the water prices,” Martinez said. “Me and my neighbors are trying to conserve water and it’s just getting expensive. The prices on the water are just outrageous.”

He also believes Fourth District County Supervisor Peter Adam, who represents Orcutt on the Board of Supervisors, should be representing his constituents in front of the CPUC. 

Kelly, the administrative law judge, will consider public testimony from meetings and mailed comments, when deciding whether the rate increase can go forward, he said. He will also consider legal briefs expected to be submitted during evidentiary hearings slated for mid-May in Los Angeles.

The Office of Ratepayer Advocates, an independent arm of the CPUC created by the legislature to represent the interests of ratepayers, will also evaluate Golden State Water’s application, making its own recommendation later this month. That recommendation may differ from the commission’s opinion.

Visit the Office of Ratepayer Advocates' website here to view its reports, including its upcoming recommendation for the proposed Golden State Water rate hike.

Individuals who didn’t attend Tuesday’s hearing can still submit written comments to: CPUC Public Advisor, 505 Van Ness Ave., San Francisco, CA 94102, or via email to [email protected] Refer to proceeding number A.17-07-010 on all correspondence. 

Golden State Water’s rate increase application to the CPUC can be viewed online here.

Noozhawk contributing writer April Charlton can be reached at [email protected]. Follow Noozhawk on Twitter: @noozhawk, @NoozhawkSociety, @NoozhawkNews and @NoozhawkBiz. Become a fan of Noozhawk on Facebook.

Talk to Us!

Please take Noozhawk's audience survey to help us understand what you expect — and want — from us. It'll take you just a few minutes. Thank you!

Get Started >

Support Noozhawk Today

You are an important ally in our mission to deliver clear, objective, high-quality professional news reporting for Santa Barbara, Goleta and the rest of Santa Barbara County. Join the Hawks Club today to help keep Noozhawk soaring.

We offer four membership levels: $5 a month, $10 a month, $25 a month or $1 a week. Payments can be made using a credit card, Apple Pay or Google Pay, or click here for information on recurring credit-card payments and a mailing address for checks.

Thank you for your vital support.

Become a Noozhawk Supporter

First name
Last name
Email
Select your monthly membership
Or choose an annual membership
×

Payment Information

Membership Subscription

You are enrolling in . Thank you for joining the Hawks Club.

Payment Method

Pay by Credit Card:

Mastercard, Visa, American Express, Discover
One click only, please!

Pay with Apple Pay or Google Pay:

Noozhawk partners with Stripe to provide secure invoicing and payments processing.
You may cancel your membership at any time by sending an email to .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address).

  • Ask
  • Vote
  • Investigate
  • Answer

Noozhawk Asks: What’s Your Question?

Welcome to Noozhawk Asks, a new feature in which you ask the questions, you help decide what Noozhawk investigates, and you work with us to find the answers.

Here’s how it works: You share your questions with us in the nearby box. In some cases, we may work with you to find the answers. In others, we may ask you to vote on your top choices to help us narrow the scope. And we’ll be regularly asking you for your feedback on a specific issue or topic.

We also expect to work together with the reader who asked the winning questions to find the answer together. Noozhawk’s objective is to come at questions from a place of curiosity and openness, and we believe a transparent collaboration is the key to achieve it.

The results of our investigation will be published here in this Noozhawk Asks section. Once or twice a month, we plan to do a review of what was asked and answered.

Thanks for asking!

Click Here to Get Started >

Reader Comments

Noozhawk is no longer accepting reader comments on our articles. Click here for the announcement. Readers are instead invited to submit letters to the editor by emailing them to [email protected]. Please provide your full name and community, as well as contact information for verification purposes only.

Daily Noozhawk

Subscribe to Noozhawk's A.M. Report, our free e-Bulletin sent out every day at 4:15 a.m. with Noozhawk's top stories, hand-picked by the editors.

Sign Up Now >