Wednesday, November 14 , 2018, 9:37 pm | Fair 52º

 
 
 
 
Advice

Goleta Backs But Won’t Fund Community Choice Energy Study

The city of Goleta supports a multi-agency effort to study whether more renewable energy sources could be used in electricity serving Central Coast communities.

A majority of officials just didn’t want to put any money toward the idea on Tuesday.

Goleta City Council unanimously voted to back a Santa Barbara County-led effort to consider Community Choice Energy, or Community Choice Aggregation, which allows California cities and counties to choose the source of electrical power and to set their own rates.

Local governments can purchase electricity from cleaner sources like solar or wind, which would then be delivered through existing utilities transmission lines.

Where council member opinions differed, however, was if Goleta should allocate $15,000 from its general fund to participate in a technical and financial feasibility study.

Mayor Paula Perotte and Councilman Michael Bennett were in favor, but councilmen Roger Aceves and Tony Vallejo didn’t want to give the county any more money than the millions Goleta already provides annually via a revenue-neutrality agreement the city signed with the county when Goleta incorporated in 2002.

Because Mayor Pro Tem Jim Farr has been absent from meetings since August with a yet-to-be-disclosed medical problem, the funding vote would’ve been deadlocked 2-2.

A dozen public speakers were in favor of the allocation, since a CCE is mentioned in Goleta’s Climate Action Plan as the best local strategy to reduce greenhouse gas emissions.

“CCE will offer rate payers something they’ve never had before — competition and choice,” said April Price of the Community Environmental Council, which allocated $50,000 of its own funds for the study.

The Santa Barbara County Board of Supervisors in June approved $400,000 in funding for the initial phase of evaluating the formation of a CCE program.

The county estimates the feasibility study will cost $500,000. To offset its contribution, the county asked other agencies to put in money and, in exchange, those agencies get a representative on an advisory working group that helps choose a consultant and review a study draft.

The Santa Barbara City Council and the Ventura County Board of Supervisors allocated $50,000 each toward the study, and San Luis Obispo County officials will soon consider a similar $50,000 request, Goleta’s advance-planning manager Anne Wells said.

Vallejo likened the county’s financial request to “a guy who mugs you on the street corner” and then asks for cab fare.

Wells assured officials that participating in the study wouldn’t alter Goleta’s existing electricity provider — Southern California Edison — but she noted a CCE could lead to surcharges.

Cities would negotiate contracts with energy providers and could also save customers money. She said customers could also opt out of a CCE program.

After completion of a study, the state would have to approve a CCE before it’s rolled out to customers, Wells said.

Aceves said he had no problem with participating, but opposed contributing money to the study. 

Staff confirmed the city wouldn’t have to pay to be involved in the study, since a CCE would need to work with Goleta to collect data.

“The study will definitely tell us what we want to know,” Perotte said.

“It’s unfortunate that Mayor Pro Tem Farr is not here, but that’s where we are at this point.”

Noozhawk staff writer Gina Potthoff can be reached at .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address). Follow Noozhawk on Twitter: @noozhawk, @NoozhawkNews and @NoozhawkBiz. Connect with Noozhawk on Facebook.

Support Noozhawk Today

You are an important ally in our mission to deliver clear, objective, high-quality professional news reporting for Santa Barbara, Goleta and the rest of Santa Barbara County. Join the Hawks Club today to help keep Noozhawk soaring.

We offer four membership levels: $5 a month, $10 a month, $25 a month or $1 a week. Payments can be made using a credit card, Apple Pay or Google Pay, or click here for information on recurring credit-card payments and a mailing address for checks.

Thank you for your vital support.

Become a Noozhawk Supporter

First name
Last name
Email
Select your monthly membership
Or choose an annual membership
×

Payment Information

Membership Subscription

You are enrolling in . Thank you for joining the Hawks Club.

Payment Method

Pay by Credit Card:

Mastercard, Visa, American Express, Discover
One click only, please!

Pay with Apple Pay or Google Pay:

Noozhawk partners with Stripe to provide secure invoicing and payments processing.
You may cancel your membership at any time by sending an email to .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address).

  • Ask
  • Vote
  • Investigate
  • Answer

Noozhawk Asks: What’s Your Question?

Welcome to Noozhawk Asks, a new feature in which you ask the questions, you help decide what Noozhawk investigates, and you work with us to find the answers.

Here’s how it works: You share your questions with us in the nearby box. In some cases, we may work with you to find the answers. In others, we may ask you to vote on your top choices to help us narrow the scope. And we’ll be regularly asking you for your feedback on a specific issue or topic.

We also expect to work together with the reader who asked the winning questions to find the answer together. Noozhawk’s objective is to come at questions from a place of curiosity and openness, and we believe a transparent collaboration is the key to achieve it.

The results of our investigation will be published here in this Noozhawk Asks section. Once or twice a month, we plan to do a review of what was asked and answered.

Thanks for asking!

Click Here to Get Started >

Reader Comments

Noozhawk is no longer accepting reader comments on our articles. Click here for the announcement. Readers are instead invited to submit letters to the editor by emailing them to [email protected]. Please provide your full name and community, as well as contact information for verification purposes only.