Saturday, April 21 , 2018, 2:49 pm | Fair 70º


Local News

Goleta Council, Residents Urge County to Preserve Goleta Beach Park

After hearing public input, city officials vote to send a letter in support of protecting the 'crown jewel' and its existing facilities

Calling it a “crown jewel of the county,” Goleta residents and council members had some strong words for Santa Barbara County on Tuesday in favor of preserving Goleta Beach Park the way it is now.

The purpose of Tuesday night’s discussion before the Goleta City Council was to gather public input so that the council could formulate an opinion to pass on to the county, which has ultimate jurisdiction of the project. County officials are scheduled to meet later this month.

Goleta Beach is the most widely used park in the county, and erosion over time could threaten the grass portion of park, structures near the beach as well as the parking lots and utilities.

The county installed emergency rock revetments on the beach in 2002, but those permits from the California Coastal Commission have expired.

Removing the rocks has been a process referred to as “managed retreat,” which calls for the removal of 1,200 feet of the rocks, elimination of 107 parking spaces, and moving the bike path and utilities.

Before the hearing, Mayor Roger Aceves urged speakers to also make their comments known to the county at a public hearing planned for 5 p.m. July 23 at the Goleta Union School District offices, 401 N. Fairview Ave.

“It’s important that your voice be heard,” he said.

Planner Anne Wells ran through a brief history of the project.

In 2008, the county submitted an application to the California Coastal Commission to erect piles in the ocean to prevent the erosion, but the commission denied the project because of impacts on sand supply to down-coast beaches.

Under the managed retreat project in front of the county, the parking lots would be converted to “sandy beach,” she said.

Another alternative mentioned in the environmental impact report includes “geotextile core dunes” that would be installed to minimize erosion to lawn and infrastructure, but the parking lots would go under this option, Wells said.

A second alternative would test eco-friendly experimental shoreline protections over a 10-year period and would build on what works best, and would retain the revetment for 10 years.

The “environmentally superior alternative” mentioned in the document was the last one introduced by Wells, which would move the revetment to the west and would keep two western lots, but losing the parking lot closest to More Mesa.

The county will consider the final EIR and the project later this year.

Mayor Aceves asked about the timeline for moving from revetments to managed retreat.

“How did we go from the original plan to this managed retreat? It seems like it’s a huge jump,” he said.

Wells said it was a response to the commission recommendation, and that it was going from one extreme to another.

There was no love lost between Councilman Michael Bennett and the California Coastal Commission as he recounted a small but vocal minority of people who lobbied the commission to vote against the staff recommendation to install the permeable pile groins.

During public comment, all of the speakers said they wanted to preserve the park for public access and supported keeping the parking.

Speaker Loren McFarland said Goleta Beach is one of the limited access points for families to get to the ocean. 

“If it’s not really broke, don’t fix it,” he said. “The county has better places to spend it’s money. ... Maintain the existing park.”

Brian Trautwein of the Environmental Defense Center said the park is a treasured place, but that “some approaches would sacrifice the beach in order to protect the park.”

He said the EDC wants to “protect it all,” and it is still reviewing the alternatives, but wants the council to stress that the beach be protected as well as the park.

Councilwoman Paula Perotte asked how people would get to the beach without the parking lots.

“That comes to mind as a question,” she said. “That place is packed.”

Perotte said she takes her elderly mother-in-law there to enjoy the ocean while sitting on the grass.

“She doesn’t want to go in the sand,” she said.

Loss of the bike path, parking lots, utilities and even encroachment on Highway 217 and the airport were of concern to Aceves.

“When you talk about retreat, when does it stop?” he asked.

Bennett said two members of the Coastal Commission had a particularly “unnerving” response to the loss of parking and access for the public.

“They basically said, ‘Let them eat cake,’” he said. “They didn’t care.”

Councilman Ed Easton said he would support looking at alternative two that would weigh a variety of experimental options.

“I think that’s the beginning of an answer ... as we try to figure out what works,” he said.

The council voted 4-1, with Easton dissenting, to send a letter asking the county to support protection of the existing park facilities. The council also approved unanimously to recommend the second alternative that would look at several options to prevent beach erosion.

“Let’s look at all the alternatives to protect Goleta Beach,” Aceves said.

Councilman Jim Farr said he didn’t think the county was approaching the issue in the right way.

“This is the most populous park in the county. ... They should have started by saying, ‘This is what we’re going to do for the people,’” he said. Why the county would consider managed retreat “is beyond me.”

Noozhawk staff writer Lara Cooper can be reached at .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address). Follow Noozhawk on Twitter: @noozhawk, @NoozhawkNews and @NoozhawkBiz. Connect with Noozhawk on Facebook.

  • Ask
  • Vote
  • Investigate
  • Answer

Noozhawk Asks: What’s Your Question?

Welcome to Noozhawk Asks, a new feature in which you ask the questions, you help decide what Noozhawk investigates, and you work with us to find the answers.

Here’s how it works: You share your questions with us in the nearby box. In some cases, we may work with you to find the answers. In others, we may ask you to vote on your top choices to help us narrow the scope. And we’ll be regularly asking you for your feedback on a specific issue or topic.

We also expect to work together with the reader who asked the winning questions to find the answer together. Noozhawk’s objective is to come at questions from a place of curiosity and openness, and we believe a transparent collaboration is the key to achieve it.

The results of our investigation will be published here in this Noozhawk Asks section. Once or twice a month, we plan to do a review of what was asked and answered.

Thanks for asking!

Click Here to Get Started >

Support Noozhawk Today

You are an important ally in our mission to deliver clear, objective, high-quality professional news reporting for Santa Barbara, Goleta and the rest of Santa Barbara County. Join the Hawks Club today to help keep Noozhawk soaring.

We offer four membership levels: $5 a month, $10 a month, $25 a month or $1 a week. Payments can be made through PayPal below, or click here for information on recurring credit-card payments.

Thank you for your vital support.

Maestro, Mastercard, Visa, American Express, Discover, Debit

Reader Comments

Noozhawk is no longer accepting reader comments on our articles. Click here for the announcement. Readers are instead invited to submit letters to the editor by emailing them to [email protected]. Please provide your full name and community, as well as contact information for verification purposes only.

Daily Noozhawk

Subscribe to Noozhawk's A.M. Report, our free e-Bulletin sent out every day at 4:15 a.m. with Noozhawk's top stories, hand-picked by the editors.

Sign Up Now >