Pixel Tracker

Thursday, November 22 , 2018, 4:02 am | Fog/Mist 52º


Goleta Holds Off on Funding Public Education Campaign for Revenue Neutrality Agreement

Former mayor Margaret Connell calls the effort 'ill-timed' and a waste of money, drawing a strong rebuke from Councilman Roger Aceves

Goleta City Manager Dan Singer pitched a public education campaign to the City Council on Tuesday afternoon, but the council members decided to wait for opinion poll results before they commit money to a public relations firm.

Singer said the city could use the momentum of election season to get voters informed and riled up about the revenue neutrality agreement with Santa Barbara County.

“It’s something we’ve been living with, and living within,” he said, adding that getting voters involved is the only way to pressure the Santa Barbara County Board of Supervisors back to the negotiating table.

Efforts by the city staff and council clearly aren’t enough, since there have been no changes to the agreement since the city incorporated in 2002, Singer said.

Some of the conditions expired after 10 years, but the city is stuck paying half its property taxes to the county indefinitely.

A 600-household phone survey is already under way to see how much Goleta Valley residents know about the revenue neutrality agreement. Councilwoman Paula Perotte wanted to wait for that survey’s results before entering a $60,000 contract with a public relations firm and the others agreed.

Mayor Michael Bennett wanted to look into using a local firm instead of the Sacramento-based GrassrootsLab as well. 

Goleta resident Barbara Massey and former mayor Margaret Connell both told the council to skip the contract, saying the county will never renegotiate.

Massey said the timing is “politically motivated” and she doubts Goleta residents will never be enraged and then storm the County Administration Building with torches. It’s a waste of money since the county will never budge, she argued.

Connell, a member of the city's first City Council, said the campaign is “ill-timed to say the least” what with the Second District county supervisor race in full swing. Supervisor Janet Wolf is running for re-election against Goleta Councilman Roger Aceves.

The agreement will be a campaign issue, without doubt, and the city should ask itself whether it wants to put $60,000 into an effort that could impact the election, she said.

Goleta should avoid “even the appearance of impropriety,” she said.

Aceves thanked her for coming, but didn’t mince words.

“This council’s had to live with many agreements your council made when the city incorporated,” he said.

Goleta paid $87 million under the agreement so far, which will be $92 million after the 2014-15 year, he said.

“You say it’s ill-timed, but it’s been on my bucket list and Michael Bennett’s bucket list since we first ran for council (in 2006),” he said. “This has nothing to do with the fact I’m running against Janet Wolf. I’ve been talking about this for seven years.”

Councilman Jim Farr said the campaign needs to start right away and inform voters that the city is “being taken advantage of.”

He believes a community coalition can point out injustices while the city can only provide information. He’s already meeting with people to get that started, he said.

“This thing needs to go away,” he said. “It’s just not right.”

The survey results and campaign ideas will be presented to the revenue neutrality agreement subcommittee — Bennett and Farr — and to the full council in February.

Noozhawk staff writer Giana Magnoli can be reached at .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address). Follow Noozhawk on Twitter: @noozhawk, @NoozhawkNews and @NoozhawkBiz. Connect with Noozhawk on Facebook.

Support Noozhawk Today

You are an important ally in our mission to deliver clear, objective, high-quality professional news reporting for Santa Barbara, Goleta and the rest of Santa Barbara County. Join the Hawks Club today to help keep Noozhawk soaring.

We offer four membership levels: $5 a month, $10 a month, $25 a month or $1 a week. Payments can be made using a credit card, Apple Pay or Google Pay, or click here for information on recurring credit-card payments and a mailing address for checks.

Thank you for your vital support.

Become a Noozhawk Supporter

First name
Last name
Select your monthly membership
Or choose an annual membership

Payment Information

Membership Subscription

You are enrolling in . Thank you for joining the Hawks Club.

Payment Method

Pay by Credit Card:

Mastercard, Visa, American Express, Discover
One click only, please!

Pay with Apple Pay or Google Pay:

Noozhawk partners with Stripe to provide secure invoicing and payments processing.
You may cancel your membership at any time by sending an email to .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address).

  • Ask
  • Vote
  • Investigate
  • Answer

Noozhawk Asks: What’s Your Question?

Welcome to Noozhawk Asks, a new feature in which you ask the questions, you help decide what Noozhawk investigates, and you work with us to find the answers.

Here’s how it works: You share your questions with us in the nearby box. In some cases, we may work with you to find the answers. In others, we may ask you to vote on your top choices to help us narrow the scope. And we’ll be regularly asking you for your feedback on a specific issue or topic.

We also expect to work together with the reader who asked the winning questions to find the answer together. Noozhawk’s objective is to come at questions from a place of curiosity and openness, and we believe a transparent collaboration is the key to achieve it.

The results of our investigation will be published here in this Noozhawk Asks section. Once or twice a month, we plan to do a review of what was asked and answered.

Thanks for asking!

Click Here to Get Started >

Reader Comments

Noozhawk is no longer accepting reader comments on our articles. Click here for the announcement. Readers are instead invited to submit letters to the editor by emailing them to [email protected]. Please provide your full name and community, as well as contact information for verification purposes only.