Tuesday, February 20 , 2018, 12:37 am | Fair 42º

 
 
 
 

Local News

Homeowner Files Class-Action Suit Over Refugio Oil Spill

The owner of a home just up the beach from the oil spill off the Gaviota coast has filed a federal class-action lawsuit against Plains All American Pipeline, alleging negligence in an attempt to recover more than $5 million in losses and to prevent future disaster.

Santa Barbara attorney A. Barry Cappello of Cappello & Noel LLP filed the class-action suit this week in U.S. District Court on behalf of Alexandria Geremia, who owns oceanfront property north of Refugio State Beach, where more than 100,000 gallons of crude oil was spilled when a Plains pipeline ruptured on May 19.

The lawsuit alleges Plains All American — owner of Line 901, the pipeline responsible — failed to install an automatic shut-off valve that could’ve averted the tragedy that has since killed wildlife, closed beaches and left a lingering noxious odor of crude oil.

Cappello is calling on all California beachfront property owners between Point Conception and the Mexican border to join in.

He believes that group could include 3,000 to 25,000 individuals or entities, considering some oil deposits could be found a year or two from now.

Several homeowners are already contemplating joining the lawsuit, and Cappello told Noozhawk he plans to announce those numbers in the coming weeks.

“What typically occurs with oil spills is the weather ultimately determines where the oil hits the shore,” Cappello said. “Right now it’s currents, and the currents have been depositing oil as far north as Gaviota — that we know of — and as far south as Manhattan Beach.

“I think it’s important that the purpose of this lawsuit isn’t just an issue of damages. We’re in this to make sure this doesn’t happen again.”

The lawsuit also seeks an injunction to force Plains to replace the pipeline with an automatic shut-off valve.

The oil spill directly encroached on the once-valuable property Geremia has owned the past couple years, so much that she can’t even walk on the beach, the lawsuit stated.

“Ms. Geremia believes the negative consequences of defendants’ oil spill will continue to depress the value of her property for the remainder of the year and for years to come,” the complaint states. “Defendants’ acts and omissions have therefore caused present injury to Ms. Geremia, as well as the concrete risk of imminent, additional injury.”

The lawsuit alleges Plains has a spotty track record, having been cited for at least 175 safety and maintenance violations since 2006.

According to the complaint, a Plains pipeline ruptured in 2014 at Los Angeles’s Atwater Village, sending more than 18,000 gallons of crude through the city’s streets.

“This tragedy could have been averted had defendants installed an automatic shut-off valve on the pipeline,” the suit states. “Such mechanisms are common on pipelines across the country. Line 901 appears to be the only pipeline of its kind in Santa Barbara County without this key safety feature.”

Plains representatives could not be reached for comment on the lawsuit, but the oil company has set up a claims-filing process for individuals and businesses that feel they’ve been impacted.

The lawsuit aims to recover “significant injuries and economic losses” via a jury trial.

Any homeowner interested in learning more about the lawsuit can contact Cappello at [email protected] or Lawrence Conlan, his partner in the case, at [email protected].

Noozhawk staff writer Gina Potthoff can be reached at .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address). Follow Noozhawk on Twitter: @noozhawk, @NoozhawkNews and @NoozhawkBiz. Connect with Noozhawk on Facebook.

  • Ask
  • Vote
  • Investigate
  • Answer

Noozhawk Asks: What’s Your Question?

Welcome to Noozhawk Asks, a new feature in which you ask the questions, you help decide what Noozhawk investigates, and you work with us to find the answers.

Here’s how it works: You share your questions with us in the nearby box. In some cases, we may work with you to find the answers. In others, we may ask you to vote on your top choices to help us narrow the scope. And we’ll be regularly asking you for your feedback on a specific issue or topic.

We also expect to work together with the reader who asked the winning questions to find the answer together. Noozhawk’s objective is to come at questions from a place of curiosity and openness, and we believe a transparent collaboration is the key to achieve it.

The results of our investigation will be published here in this Noozhawk Asks section. Once or twice a month, we plan to do a review of what was asked and answered.

Thanks for asking!

Click here to get started >

Support Noozhawk Today

You are an important ally in our mission to deliver clear, objective, high-quality professional news reporting for Santa Barbara, Goleta and the rest of Santa Barbara County. Join the Hawks Club today to help keep Noozhawk soaring.

We offer four membership levels: $5 a month, $10 a month, $25 a month or $1 a week. Payments can be made through PayPal below, or click here for information on recurring credit-card payments.

Thank you for your vital support.



Reader Comments

Noozhawk is no longer accepting reader comments on our articles. Click here for the announcement. Readers are instead invited to submit letters to the editor by emailing them to [email protected]. Please provide your full name and community, as well as contact information for verification purposes only.

Daily Noozhawk

Subscribe to Noozhawk's A.M. Report, our free e-Bulletin sent out every day at 4:15 a.m. with Noozhawk's top stories, hand-picked by the editors.

Sign Up Now >