Sunday, February 18 , 2018, 12:45 pm | Fair 61º

Sports: A Noozhawk Partnership with The Lab and American Riviera Bank
The LabAmerican Riviera Bank

It’s More About Biodiversity Than We Think, Say Scientists

The more varieties of plants there are in a given habitat, the more productive they are, a new study shows.

If we want to keep the benefits we get from the world’s plants — oxygen, food and fiber, for instance — we might consider seriously stepping up the conservation efforts, according to a new study. An analysis conducted by an international team of scientists found that as plant species continue to go extinct, total plant productivity in those areas decreases.

“It’s really about the number of species,” said Bradley Cardinale, assistant professor of biology at UCSB and lead author of the paper, which appeared last week in the online issue of the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

By studying the results of 44 experiments from around the world which simulated plant species extinction the researchers found that ecosystems with decreased biodiversity produced up to 50 percent less plant biomass than ecosystems with more natural levels of diversity.

Not only would more diverse plants communities be more likely to have highly productive species, but more importantly, the researchers say, the more diverse communities have species that complement each other in the way they behave in their environment.

It helps to think about it the way co-author Andy Hector from the University of Zurich sees it: "The results of our analyses suggest that plant communities operate much like a soccer team," he said. "Teams are composed of both star players and supporting players. You probably can’t win many games if you lose your top striker because she or he is the most productive player and can dominate a game. But strikers cannot win games by themselves. They need great passes from supporting players and solid goal-tending if the team is going to be successful as a whole."

The David Beckhams of our local plant community would probably be trees and plants like the Scrub Oak  and the Manzanita, according to Cardinale.

“There are, however, hundreds of plant species that comprise the chaparral,” he said. Loss of these less dominant species could decrease plant productivity by more than the loss of each of the biggest plants alone.

It’s a finding that might cause some conservationists to rethink their methods. Cardinale was one of them.

"There’s been this question of how much species extinction matters,” he said “I have to admit, I was on the side of the debate that focused on conserving the dominant species.” The paper, he said, convinced him that bigger isn’t necessarily better.

“The big guys are important but not enough.” And because experiments to date have only been funded to run over a few years, it’s likely the impacts of species diversity has been understated, Cardinale said.

The solution isn’t going to be an easy one. In order to keep varieties of species, entire habitats would need to be preserved, not just single species, according to Cardinale. It’s a tall order for a growing human population, he said.

“But if we want to preserve the basic oxygen/carbon dioxide process, we should conserve more species of plants,” he said.

  • Ask
  • Vote
  • Investigate
  • Answer

Noozhawk Asks: What’s Your Question?

Welcome to Noozhawk Asks, a new feature in which you ask the questions, you help decide what Noozhawk investigates, and you work with us to find the answers.

Here’s how it works: You share your questions with us in the nearby box. In some cases, we may work with you to find the answers. In others, we may ask you to vote on your top choices to help us narrow the scope. And we’ll be regularly asking you for your feedback on a specific issue or topic.

We also expect to work together with the reader who asked the winning questions to find the answer together. Noozhawk’s objective is to come at questions from a place of curiosity and openness, and we believe a transparent collaboration is the key to achieve it.

The results of our investigation will be published here in this Noozhawk Asks section. Once or twice a month, we plan to do a review of what was asked and answered.

Thanks for asking!

Click here to get started >

Support Noozhawk Today

You are an important ally in our mission to deliver clear, objective, high-quality professional news reporting for Santa Barbara, Goleta and the rest of Santa Barbara County. Join the Hawks Club today to help keep Noozhawk soaring.

We offer four membership levels: $5 a month, $10 a month, $25 a month or $1 a week. Payments can be made through PayPal below, or click here for information on recurring credit-card payments.

Thank you for your vital support.

Reader Comments

Noozhawk is no longer accepting reader comments on our articles. Click here for the announcement. Readers are instead invited to submit letters to the editor by emailing them to [email protected]. Please provide your full name and community, as well as contact information for verification purposes only.

Daily Noozhawk

Subscribe to Noozhawk's A.M. Report, our free e-Bulletin sent out every day at 4:15 a.m. with Noozhawk's top stories, hand-picked by the editors.

Sign Up Now >