Sunday, May 27 , 2018, 5:34 pm | Fair 65º


Jamie Stiehm: If Only Bill Clinton Had Been Re-Elected President a 3rd and 4th Time

Deep in the heart of summer, things stand still in Washington, D.C., as an army of cicadas conquers the capital.

As one of those who has not fled, I’m left to wander down history’s trails, ambling up to the present.

William Jefferson Clinton’s 70th birthday Aug. 19 struck me as a “big deal,” something he used to say. His silver mane looks like the lion in winter. How I wish he were the lion for all seasons.

His “best darn change-maker” speech for Democratic presidential nominee Hillary Clinton in Philadelphia explained his wife better than she explains herself.

Clinton was the best president in my life, a bringer of peace and prosperity in the 1990s. Many enjoyed his sunny exuberance, his talents in the same class as Republican Theodore Roosevelt.

Now I’m going there, a place that plunges me into angst: Why couldn’t Clinton run for president again and perhaps again?

Rascally Republicans introduced the 22nd Amendment, passed in a petty partisan flash after a different Roosevelt, Franklin Delano Roosevelt, was elected to four terms, from 1932-1944.

There was a lot going on, of course, from the Depression to World War II.

The greatest modern president, beloved for speaking straight to the people, died in April 1945. Two years later, Congress passed the amendment to the Constitution that limits presidents to two terms, ratified in 1951. How ungrateful to FDR for saving the nation. And what profound consequences.

Surely Bill Clinton would have won in 2000, over a brash genial governor. The outgoing president was only 54, and his popularity ratings were higher than you might think. It’s hard to hold a grudge against the guy.

If Clinton were the incoming president, how much trouble we Americans never would have seen?

Walk with me into the brambles.

George W. Bush defined his presidency by the tragic Sept. 11 attacks, leading to several long wars not over yet, drawing down the treasury and military morale.

Torture at Guantanamo became as an uneasy public conversation. The Patriot Act and a Homeland Security Department, swiftly passed into law, created a new surveillance state.

It’s the way we live now, 15 years sunk.

Clinton may have heeded CIA “blinking red” briefings in August 2001. After 9/11, as commander in chief, he likely would have waged an Army campaign in Afghanistan, but he would not have invaded Iraq over the nefarious plot of 19 men — none Iraqi — and would not have lied about WMDs.

We’d have none of that desert storm in the sand that destroyed Iraq’s social fabric and took thousands of lives for no good reason. And it’s safe to say ISIS would not be chilling hearts all over the world as Syria is torn apart.

The 2008 financial crisis may have happened on Clinton’s watch, but his adept skills at high-stakes moments would have forced a larger stimulus from Congress than young President Barack Obama.

Clinton would have appealed to our best selves, as FDR did after Pearl Harbor, rather than fear-mongering the citizenry — or telling us to go shopping — saying inane words like, “We are here in the middle hour of our grief.”

Despite his swagger, George W. Bush did as bad as the hapless fourth president.

President James Madison comes to mind, for August is when, 202 years ago, he let the British army burn the Capitol and the White House without firing a shot. Washington was not defended; Madison galloped over the river.

A military and political debacle, “Mr. Madison’s War” went on, unpopular as it was. Madison ducked the consequences of the sacking, thanks to battle victories in Baltimore and New Orleans that had little to do with him.

Some presidents are better than others. Although President Thomas Jefferson’s chosen successor chiseled the Constitution in 1787 — Madison’s fame is as the document’s father — the Virginia planter (and, yes, slave owner) proved one of our weakest presidents ever.

During my historical ramble, I asked Madison about the 22nd Amendment, and he agreed with me. Americans have every right to elect the president they want, every time they choose.

Jamie Stiehm writes about politics, culture and history as a weekly Creators Syndicate columnist and regular contributor to U.S. News & World Report, The New York Times and The Washington Post. Follow her on Twitter: @jamiestiehm. The opinions expressed are her own.

Support Noozhawk Today

You are an important ally in our mission to deliver clear, objective, high-quality professional news reporting for Santa Barbara, Goleta and the rest of Santa Barbara County. Join the Hawks Club today to help keep Noozhawk soaring.

We offer four membership levels: $5 a month, $10 a month, $25 a month or $1 a week. Payments can be made through PayPal below, or click here for information on recurring credit-card payments.

Thank you for your vital support.

Become a Supporter

Enter your email
Select your membership level

Payment Information

You are purchasing:

Payment Method

Pay by Credit Card:

Mastercard, Visa, American Express, Discover

Pay with Apple Pay or Google Pay:

Noozhawk partners with Stripe to provide secure invoicing and payments processing.

  • Ask
  • Vote
  • Investigate
  • Answer

Noozhawk Asks: What’s Your Question?

Welcome to Noozhawk Asks, a new feature in which you ask the questions, you help decide what Noozhawk investigates, and you work with us to find the answers.

Here’s how it works: You share your questions with us in the nearby box. In some cases, we may work with you to find the answers. In others, we may ask you to vote on your top choices to help us narrow the scope. And we’ll be regularly asking you for your feedback on a specific issue or topic.

We also expect to work together with the reader who asked the winning questions to find the answer together. Noozhawk’s objective is to come at questions from a place of curiosity and openness, and we believe a transparent collaboration is the key to achieve it.

The results of our investigation will be published here in this Noozhawk Asks section. Once or twice a month, we plan to do a review of what was asked and answered.

Thanks for asking!

Click Here to Get Started >

Reader Comments

Noozhawk is no longer accepting reader comments on our articles. Click here for the announcement. Readers are instead invited to submit letters to the editor by emailing them to [email protected]. Please provide your full name and community, as well as contact information for verification purposes only.

Daily Noozhawk

Subscribe to Noozhawk's A.M. Report, our free e-Bulletin sent out every day at 4:15 a.m. with Noozhawk's top stories, hand-picked by the editors.

Sign Up Now >