Pixel Tracker

Monday, November 19 , 2018, 2:54 pm | Partly Cloudy with Haze 66º

 
 
 
 

Jamie Stiehm: Democracy Stirs to Life with Resistance to Donald Trump

When Congress returned home, Republicans got clobbered at town hall meetings in red states like Utah, Iowa and Tennessee. Some even missed Washington.

These scenes made me check up on our democracy’s wellness. Bad news: The body politic’s muscles got flabby in the last 16-17 years. Blood pressure up and too many Cheetos, not enough kale.

Dazed in November, we woke to a nightmare — a rogue president, now making misery in our land. Abroad, Sweden is mad at his loose talk on refugees and terrorism. Mexico is offended at forceful deportations. It’s safe to say almost all of the world is unhappy.

Note to world: Oh, don’t get us wrong. We’re better than that. Three million more Americans voted for his opponent. The cursed Electoral College struck.

How did citizens let President Donald Trump rule? Before examining what ails democracy, here’s the happy news: We the people are getting stronger in the spirit of resistance. That’s the cure for what ails us.

American democracy was the envy and the light of the world. In his classic, Democracy in America, French author Alexis de Tocqueville saw the early New England town meeting as a sign of robust self-government.

In other words, civic engagement. He praised self-reliance combined with a sense of the common good. That made us great.

Darkness colored the 2000 presidential contest, which George W. Bush won over Al Gore by one vote, the U.S. Supreme Court’s 5-4 decision.

In a period of peace and prosperity, the campaign at times centered on the candidates’ likability over a beer. Bush, a former fraternity president and governor of Texas, was that guy. Yes, but Gore won the people’s vote by a half-million.

We let it be. And then came the worst day since Pearl Harbor. New York’s twin towers burned to dust in the ground and the smoking Pentagon only had four sides at the end of the day — Sept. 11, 2001. Nearly 3,000 died. Many more would have died if civilian New Yorkers and first responders had not shown grace and courage, helping others to safety.

It took 19 murderous men, 15 from Saudi Arabia, to attack us from the air. The 40 civilian passengers on the last doomed plane saved the Capitol by rushing the hijacker pilot and taking the plane down to earth. It shattered in a lonely Pennsylvania field under the bluest sky.

Pearl Harbor was a military attack; 9/11 was a civilian attack. In late 1941, President Franklin D. Roosevelt joined World War II and brought out the best in American character.

The sad thing is that Bush, after ignoring intelligence warnings (“blinking red”), did nothing to direct the outpouring of sympathy and citizenship after the 9/11 attacks. As San Francisco author Rebecca Solnit wrote, “We were asked to go shopping and to spy on our neighbors.”

We got a brand-new behemoth, the Homeland Security Department, to mark the millennium.

The Iraq War was on before the flames of September were out. Bush and his men had “regime change” on their list. So what if Iraqi dictator Saddam Hussein wasn’t connected with 9/11? The attacks were the perfect vehicle to start a war and settle a score.

Iraq had no weapons of mass destruction, but Bush presented a false case to the American people. Loyal soldier Colin Powell went to the United Nations and told untruths to the world community; he wasn’t in on the plan.

People did protest Bush’s war in 2003, from San Francisco to Washington. But they were not seen or heard. The news media, with pundits praising the war (Thomas Friedman and Christopher Hitchens) silenced voices of dissent.

That’s when democracy started going soft and pitch dark.

Electing President Barack Obama in 2008 was easy, the cool cat who gave speeches that rocked. In 2016, you had to work harder to judge schoolmarmish Hillary Clinton versus Trump, the dark cable clown.

Sadly, Bush’s big lies made our constitution more resistant to Trump’s myriad little lies.

Still, most thought American democracy was healthy enough to do the right thing. And we did, almost.

World, don’t give up on us yet. Because it’s clear that resistance is alive and well.

Jamie Stiehm writes about politics, culture and history as a weekly Creators Syndicate columnist and regular contributor to U.S. News & World Report. Follow her on Twitter: @jamiestiehm. Click here to read previous columns. The opinions expressed are her own.

Support Noozhawk Today

You are an important ally in our mission to deliver clear, objective, high-quality professional news reporting for Santa Barbara, Goleta and the rest of Santa Barbara County. Join the Hawks Club today to help keep Noozhawk soaring.

We offer four membership levels: $5 a month, $10 a month, $25 a month or $1 a week. Payments can be made using a credit card, Apple Pay or Google Pay, or click here for information on recurring credit-card payments and a mailing address for checks.

Thank you for your vital support.

Become a Noozhawk Supporter

First name
Last name
Email
Select your monthly membership
Or choose an annual membership
×

Payment Information

Membership Subscription

You are enrolling in . Thank you for joining the Hawks Club.

Payment Method

Pay by Credit Card:

Mastercard, Visa, American Express, Discover
One click only, please!

Pay with Apple Pay or Google Pay:

Noozhawk partners with Stripe to provide secure invoicing and payments processing.
You may cancel your membership at any time by sending an email to .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address).

  • Ask
  • Vote
  • Investigate
  • Answer

Noozhawk Asks: What’s Your Question?

Welcome to Noozhawk Asks, a new feature in which you ask the questions, you help decide what Noozhawk investigates, and you work with us to find the answers.

Here’s how it works: You share your questions with us in the nearby box. In some cases, we may work with you to find the answers. In others, we may ask you to vote on your top choices to help us narrow the scope. And we’ll be regularly asking you for your feedback on a specific issue or topic.

We also expect to work together with the reader who asked the winning questions to find the answer together. Noozhawk’s objective is to come at questions from a place of curiosity and openness, and we believe a transparent collaboration is the key to achieve it.

The results of our investigation will be published here in this Noozhawk Asks section. Once or twice a month, we plan to do a review of what was asked and answered.

Thanks for asking!

Click Here to Get Started >

Reader Comments

Noozhawk is no longer accepting reader comments on our articles. Click here for the announcement. Readers are instead invited to submit letters to the editor by emailing them to [email protected]. Please provide your full name and community, as well as contact information for verification purposes only.