Friday, May 25 , 2018, 2:49 pm | A Few Clouds 65º

 
 
 
 

Jamie Stiehm: Mark Zuckerberg, Congress Hardly Facing Up to Facebook’s Harm

Mark Zuckerberg had every crisp line memorized on center stage in Washington last week. The nation’s capital desperately needed diversion from the giant white whale about to blow at the White House.

Thanks, I guess, as President Donald Trump circles the ship, the USS Constitution.

“The metamorphosis of young Mark” tour came to us from 1 Hacker Way, the address of his Facebook empire in Menlo Park. (Gives it all away, doesn’t it?) At 33, the billionaire founder and CEO was wearing a sharp suit and tie, letting go of the designer T-shirt he sports back home.

Zuckerberg played the humble Internet emperor giving some 80 members of Congress his full gaze and deference. He prefaced answers with “Senator,” “Congresswoman” or “Congressman.”

He had much to answer for, especially for the 87 million Facebook users whose profiles were swiped by Cambridge Analytica, a fancy name for a dishonest outfit that meddled in the 2016 presidential election for a foreign power. Russian online spies used that data harvest of deception to tilt the election in Trump’s favor.

That’s the dark state of democracy. To that grave point, Zuckerman said that, frankly, Facebook was “slow to identify the Russian misinformation.” An extremely lawyerly understatement.

The Washington Post described his star-powered Senate testimony as “contrite.” Though he said “sorry” a hundred times, Zuckerberg appeared impassive and bulletproof, even under the hardest fire, which came from women: Sen. Kamala Harris, D-Calif., and Rep. Debbie Dingell, D-Mich.

Like a country lawyer, folksy Sen. John Kennedy, R-La., scolded Zuckerberg under the glare of government scrutiny: “Your user agreement sucks!”

The hearings were Zuckerberg’s first spanking in the public square. At the end of two days, he took the dressing down and deftly agreed at every turn that more “regulation” was necessary to harness social media’s power run amok. The Internet is like a vast virtual prairie, a lawless frontier.

Yet stop to remember this. Days after Trump’s surprise win, Zuckerberg professed shock at the idea of shadowy political posts. What a “pretty crazy idea” that “fake news” on Facebook “influenced the election in any way.”

That’s the real Zuckerberg unbound: callow, cocky, not a civic bone in his body, not even two years ago. So much for American democracy.

Lawmakers did not dwell on the harm done by a compromised election; don’t ask me why. (Some fear the white whale.)

Online privacy was the gist of most questions. “Online privacy” sounds quaint, as if there is such a thing. Americans today are so thirsty for community that we surrender “data” to strengthen “weak ties,” a fine field of friends you barely know but would like to meet in another life. That’s the bargain, the user agreement.

Old senators looked curiously at this character, atop an ethereal empire, a fortune in something that can’t be seen or touched, like coal, steel, railroads or oil. A handful bantered to impress Zuckerberg with what they knew about Facebook to keep in touch. It was a bit sad, but they tried to relate over the generational river.

Zuckerberg’s original mission was to create a system for grading Harvard young women against each other, on “hotness,” using photos without permission. Not a very fine foundation in this “#MeToo” era.

The casual T-shirt is almost a disguise for Zuckerberg. Harvard is fine, though he dropped out and never took civics. But he also went to an elite Eastern boarding school, Phillips Exeter Academy. He comes from the privileged, ruling-class background of a robber baron.

Here, the fear goes on. The mighty whale is madder than ever since his lawyer’s office was raided. The “constitutional crisis” conversation centers on Trump possibly firing special counsel Robert Mueller, who is investigating the Russian role in the election. (Yes, he questioned Facebook.)

Another alarm bell: The big tax break work of House Speaker Paul Ryan, R-Wis., is done within the Capitol’s alabaster walls, so he’s leaving. The whale knows that’s like handing the House keys to the blue wave of Democrats.

The white whale doesn’t like the blue wave. Thanks for the distraction, Mark. I guess.

Jamie Stiehm writes about politics, culture and history as a weekly Creators Syndicate columnist and regular contributor to U.S. News & World Report. Follow her on Twitter: @jamiestiehm. Click here to read previous columns. The opinions expressed are her own.

Support Noozhawk Today

You are an important ally in our mission to deliver clear, objective, high-quality professional news reporting for Santa Barbara, Goleta and the rest of Santa Barbara County. Join the Hawks Club today to help keep Noozhawk soaring.

We offer four membership levels: $5 a month, $10 a month, $25 a month or $1 a week. Payments can be made through PayPal below, or click here for information on recurring credit-card payments.

Thank you for your vital support.

Become a Supporter

Enter your email
Select your membership level
×

Payment Information

You are purchasing:

Payment Method

Pay by Credit Card:

Mastercard, Visa, American Express, Discover

Pay with Apple Pay or Google Pay:

Noozhawk partners with Stripe to provide secure invoicing and payments processing.

  • Ask
  • Vote
  • Investigate
  • Answer

Noozhawk Asks: What’s Your Question?

Welcome to Noozhawk Asks, a new feature in which you ask the questions, you help decide what Noozhawk investigates, and you work with us to find the answers.

Here’s how it works: You share your questions with us in the nearby box. In some cases, we may work with you to find the answers. In others, we may ask you to vote on your top choices to help us narrow the scope. And we’ll be regularly asking you for your feedback on a specific issue or topic.

We also expect to work together with the reader who asked the winning questions to find the answer together. Noozhawk’s objective is to come at questions from a place of curiosity and openness, and we believe a transparent collaboration is the key to achieve it.

The results of our investigation will be published here in this Noozhawk Asks section. Once or twice a month, we plan to do a review of what was asked and answered.

Thanks for asking!

Click Here to Get Started >

Reader Comments

Noozhawk is no longer accepting reader comments on our articles. Click here for the announcement. Readers are instead invited to submit letters to the editor by emailing them to [email protected]. Please provide your full name and community, as well as contact information for verification purposes only.

Daily Noozhawk

Subscribe to Noozhawk's A.M. Report, our free e-Bulletin sent out every day at 4:15 a.m. with Noozhawk's top stories, hand-picked by the editors.

Sign Up Now >