Pixel Tracker

Saturday, March 23 , 2019, 2:20 pm | Mostly Cloudy 62º

 
 
 
 

Jamie Stiehm: Senate Says Goodbye to 3 Legendary Democratic Party Voices

The Senate chamber holds a fascination as political theater, but three great Democratic players are taking their last bows. Their vigorous voices will be missed in the fight against President Donald Trump. There’s nobody quite like this trifecta, all proudly from humble origins.

“Where’s the justice, Mr. President?” This question was often asked of the presiding senator by Sen. Barbara Boxer, D-Calif.

Senate Minority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev., was once a boxer himself, and it showed up in his style. Never one for subtlety, his blunt political punches can be felt a mile away.

Sen. Barbara Mikulski, D-Md., dean of the Senate women, is formidable as a friend or foe — always with a touch of the Baltimore girl she was.

Mikulski has reached 80; Boxer and Reid are in their 70s. They decided it was time not to run again.

Gone unnoticed amid election frenzy, their leaving feels as autumnal as the tree leaves outside the Capitol. Seems like yesterday when I was a rookie reporter, studying these characters.

In total, they’ve served 84 years in the Senate. Thinking it over, they changed it forever, especially the two trailblazing women.

Reid was frank in a floor speech on how Boxer “mentored” him on women’s issues. Then he spoke in closing, “You are and will always be my sister.” Such open sentiments are rare.

Reid is also open about his contempt for Trump, cutting him as a racist and a sexual predator as the 2016 campaign wore on. He worked hard to deliver Nevada for Hillary Clinton.

After the election, he urged Trump, “Rise to the dignity of the office.” His successor as Senate minority leader, Charles Schumer, is a silver-tongued New Yorker, likely to have a better art of dealing with Trump.

Reid’s antagonism toward Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., went both ways: no love lost. They contained it on the floor, but in his new memoir, The Long Game, McConnell made plain his frustration with Reid, “bombastic” in front of cameras, saying his floor style was like a campaign studio.

Usually, party leaders strive for decorum. Previous Senate party leaders Tom Daschle, D-S.D., and Trent Lott, R-Miss., got along.

Actually, Reid’s Trumanesque way with words made a foil for the abstract president: “Professor Obama,” as McConnell calls him. President Barack Obama erred early, thinking he could charm and work with congressional Republicans — even sly McConnell.

Against Reid’s strenuous advice, he surrendered and extended President George W. Bush’s tax cuts for the well-off, close to Republican hearts. That may have marked Obama as naive in negotiations — he tried to be friends with his enemies. Reid, son of a miner in Searchlight, Nev., never does that.

Oh, Barbara. Both Mikulski and Boxer are heroines in my book. They radiate intensity.

Boxer ran for the Senate in 1992, Year of the Woman, after Clarence Thomas’ confirmation hearings for the U.S. Supreme Court. Thomas squeaked by, 52-48, in an unforgettable drama involving Anita Hill’s testimony that he sexually harassed her.

America was unimpressed to see the Senate at work, under the sloppy gavel of Sen. Joe Biden, D-Del., to see a sea of ties voting. There were two women in the Senate.

Today there are 20. Every woman elected since owes a debt to Mikulski for bringing a bipartisan dinner group of Senate women together to get to know each another and discuss ropes and rules of the clubby Senate. Mikulski hosts the monthly dinner, building community.

As a social worker, she organized opposition to a highway cutting through Baltimore’s downtown — and won. She told me, “Being a senator is like being a social worker with power.” And then she laughed. Her first run was for the Baltimore City Council.

A grocer’s daughter, Mikulski went to the same Catholic girls school as House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif. When she chaired the Senate Appropriations Committee and Pelosi was House speaker, they were the most powerful women in Congress — and still are.

Reid praised the Marylander’s floor oratory: no one better. Her words are heard across the aisle, and when she’s mad, you know it.

Same goes for Boxer, a Brooklyn native who shows resolve and fury at any injustice that crosses her. A champion of the environment, she crossed swords with Sen. James Inhofe, R-Okla., chairman of the Senate Environment & Public Works Committee and a climate change denier, yet they seem friendly.

In a final stand, Boxer denounced the election results: “We have a system where the winner can lose.”

Time to hang up the gloves. But the fighter still remains, as the Simon & Garfunkel song says.

Jamie Stiehm writes about politics, culture and history as a weekly Creators Syndicate columnist and regular contributor to U.S. News & World Report, The New York Times and The Washington Post. Follow her on Twitter: @jamiestiehm. The opinions expressed are her own.

Support Noozhawk Today!

Our professional journalists work tirelessly to report on local news so you can be more informed and engaged in your community. This quality, local reporting is free for you to read and share, but it's not free to produce.

You count on us to deliver timely, relevant local news, 24/7. Can we count on you to invest in our newsroom and help secure its future?

We provide special member benefits to show how much we appreciate your support.

Email
I would like give...
Great! You're joining as a Red-Tailed Hawk!
  • Ask
  • Vote
  • Investigate
  • Answer

Noozhawk Asks: What’s Your Question?

Welcome to Noozhawk Asks, a new feature in which you ask the questions, you help decide what Noozhawk investigates, and you work with us to find the answers.

Here’s how it works: You share your questions with us in the nearby box. In some cases, we may work with you to find the answers. In others, we may ask you to vote on your top choices to help us narrow the scope. And we’ll be regularly asking you for your feedback on a specific issue or topic.

We also expect to work together with the reader who asked the winning questions to find the answer together. Noozhawk’s objective is to come at questions from a place of curiosity and openness, and we believe a transparent collaboration is the key to achieve it.

The results of our investigation will be published here in this Noozhawk Asks section. Once or twice a month, we plan to do a review of what was asked and answered.

Thanks for asking!

Click Here to Get Started >

Reader Comments

Noozhawk is no longer accepting reader comments on our articles. Click here for the announcement. Readers are instead invited to submit letters to the editor by emailing them to [email protected]. Please provide your full name and community, as well as contact information for verification purposes only.

Daily Noozhawk

Subscribe to Noozhawk's A.M. Report, our free e-Bulletin sent out every day at 4:15 a.m. with Noozhawk's top stories, hand-picked by the editors.

Sign Up Now >