Saturday, August 18 , 2018, 11:51 pm | Fair with Haze 67º

 
 
 
 
Advice

Joe Conason: Why Israel’s Security Experts Support the Iran Deal and Iran’s Hardliners Don’t



As Congressional Republicans seek to undermine the nuclear agreement between Iran and the international powers, they assert that hardline Islamists in the Islamic Republic are delighted with the deal while Israelis concerned over their country's security are appalled.

The same theme is now repeated constantly on Fox News Channel and throughout right-wing media.

But that message is largely false — and in very important respects, the opposite is true.

In arguing for the agreement at American University last Wednesday, President Obama noted that the most hostile factions in the Tehran regime aren't celebrating this agreement — as the cover of The New York Post suggested.

"In fact, it's those hardliners who are most comfortable with the status quo," he said. "It's those hardliners chanting 'Death to America' who have been most opposed to the deal. They're making common cause with the Republican caucus."

Indeed, while vast throngs of Iranians greeted their government's negotiators in a joyous welcome, the fanatical reactionaries in the Revolutionary Guard and the paramilitary Basij movement — which have violently repressed democratic currents in Iran — could barely control their outrage.

Upon reading the terms, a Basij spokesman said last month, "We quickly realized that what we feared ... had become a reality. If Iran agrees with this, our nuclear industry will be handcuffed for many years to come."

Hoping and perhaps praying for a veto by Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, their supreme leader, the Basijis, the right-wing media in Tehran and their regime sponsors pointed to "red lines" that the agreement allegedly crossed.

"We will never accept it," said Mohammad Ali Jafari, a high-ranking Revolutionary Guard commander.

Such shrill expressions of frustration should encourage everyone who understands the agreement's real value.

Iran's "Death to America, Death to Israel" cohort hates this deal — not only because of its highly restrictive provisions but because over the long term, it strengthens their democratic opponents and threatens their corrupt control of Iranian society.

In Israel, meanwhile, the alarmist criticism of Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu — a sage whose confident predictions about Iran, Iraq and almost everything else are reliably, totally wrong — has obscured support from actual military and intelligence leaders. Like experts in this country and around the world, the best-informed Israelis understand the deal's imperfections very well — and support it nevertheless.

"There are no ideal agreements," declared Ami Ayalon, a military veteran who headed the Israeli Navy and later oversaw the Jewish state's security service, the Shin Bet. But as Ayalon explained to J.J. Goldberg of the Forward, this agreement is "the best possible alternative from Israel's point of view, given the other available alternatives" — including the most likely alternative which is, as Obama explained, another extremely dangerous Mideast war.

Efraim Halevy, who formerly ran the Mossad, Israel's foreign intelligence service, and later headed its National Security Council, concurs with Ayalon (and Obama).

Writing in Yedioth Ahronoth, the national daily published in Tel Aviv, Halevy points out a profound contradiction in Netanyahu's blustering complaints.

Having warned that an Iranian nuclear weapon would pose a unique existential threat to Israel, how can Bibi logically reject the agreement that forestalls any bomb development for at least 15 years and increases the "breakout time" from one month to a year — even if Iran ultimately violates its commitments?

Such a deal is far preferable to no deal, the ex-Mossad chief insists, although it won't necessarily dissuade Tehran from making trouble elsewhere.

Halevy also emphasizes that no mythical "better" deal would ever win support from Russia and China, Iran's main weapons suppliers, whose leaders have endorsed this agreement.

In short, both of these top former officials believe the agreement with Iran will enhance their nation's security — and contrary to what Fox News Channel's sages might claim, they represent mainstream opinion in Israel's military and intelligence circles.

So perhaps we can safely discount the partisan demagogues and feckless opportunists who claim to be protecting the Jewish state from Barack Obama.

And when someone like Mike Huckabee ​— who memorably escaped military service because of his "flat feet" — denounces the president for "marching Israelis to the oven door," let's remember the sane and serious response of Israel's most experienced defenders.

Joe Conason is editor in chief of NationalMemo.com. Click here to contact him, follow him on Twitter: @JoeConason, or click here to read previous columns. The opinions expressed are his own.

Support Noozhawk Today

You are an important ally in our mission to deliver clear, objective, high-quality professional news reporting for Santa Barbara, Goleta and the rest of Santa Barbara County. Join the Hawks Club today to help keep Noozhawk soaring.

We offer four membership levels: $5 a month, $10 a month, $25 a month or $1 a week. Payments can be made through Stripe below, or click here for information on recurring credit-card payments and a mailing address for checks.

Thank you for your vital support.

Become a Noozhawk Supporter

First name
Last name
Enter your email
Select your membership level
×

Payment Information

You are purchasing:

Payment Method

Pay by Credit Card:

Mastercard, Visa, American Express, Discover
One click only, please!

Pay with Apple Pay or Google Pay:

Noozhawk partners with Stripe to provide secure invoicing and payments processing.

  • Ask
  • Vote
  • Investigate
  • Answer

Noozhawk Asks: What’s Your Question?

Welcome to Noozhawk Asks, a new feature in which you ask the questions, you help decide what Noozhawk investigates, and you work with us to find the answers.

Here’s how it works: You share your questions with us in the nearby box. In some cases, we may work with you to find the answers. In others, we may ask you to vote on your top choices to help us narrow the scope. And we’ll be regularly asking you for your feedback on a specific issue or topic.

We also expect to work together with the reader who asked the winning questions to find the answer together. Noozhawk’s objective is to come at questions from a place of curiosity and openness, and we believe a transparent collaboration is the key to achieve it.

The results of our investigation will be published here in this Noozhawk Asks section. Once or twice a month, we plan to do a review of what was asked and answered.

Thanks for asking!

Click Here to Get Started >

Reader Comments

Noozhawk is no longer accepting reader comments on our articles. Click here for the announcement. Readers are instead invited to submit letters to the editor by emailing them to [email protected]. Please provide your full name and community, as well as contact information for verification purposes only.

Daily Noozhawk

Subscribe to Noozhawk's A.M. Report, our free e-Bulletin sent out every day at 4:15 a.m. with Noozhawk's top stories, hand-picked by the editors.

Sign Up Now >