Pixel Tracker

Saturday, January 19 , 2019, 11:03 pm | Fair 53º

 
 
 
 

Joe Guzzardi: Agriculture Industry’s Last Gasp to Promote Cheap, Stoop Labor

The agriculture industry’s decades-old myth, which it has so fervently promoted, is that without cheap stoop labor, crops will “rot in the field.”

Since the failed bracero program ended more than 50 years ago, the ag lobby has insisted that its salvation lay in temporary guest worker legislation that would import an unending stream of field hands.

Ten years ago, Sen. Dianne Feinstein, D-Calif., who knows better, said during her push for guest worker legislation that California faced “an emergency” if illegal immigrants couldn’t be found “to prune, to plant, to pick, to pack.” But the fable may finally have run its course.

The summer of 2017 is ending, and once again consumers have had the usual wide variety of fruits and vegetables to choose from. Farmers’ markets from coast-to-coast teem with product.

And this abundance despite President Donald Trump’s vow to enforce immigration laws: fewer migrants are coming north, and some of those already here are self-deporting. Yet growers have survived the predicted, but nonexistent labor crunch.

The Los Angeles Times broke a story last month that chronicled ag-tech’s progress in California’s $47 billion farming industry. Driscoll’s, a family-owned, privately held company headquartered in Watsonville and the world’s leading berry grower, is moving its crops to table-top troughs, which makes picking easier for man and machine. The transition began a decade ago in Australia and Europe, but has been slow to catch on in the United States, mainly because of stoop labor’s ready availability.

Two experts, Philip Martin, chairman of the Comparative Immigration & Integration Program at UC Davis, and Michael Teitelbaum, an Oxford University scholar and Harvard Law School senior Labor and Worklife Program researcher, have written extensively about the flawed concepts behind guest labor. Namely, workers often don’t go home, and eventually their families join then or they start new families stateside, and create a continuously growing welfare-dependent class.

Moreover, with cheap labor easily available, growers had little incentive to pursue alternatives like automation.

Even if growers lack the capital to invest in mechanization, some have shifted to more employee-friendly policies, like providing health care, giving bonuses and improving working conditions — hydraulic lifts that replace ladders, and conveyor belts that eliminate carrying crates.

Despite years of scare stories about an imminent ag crisis, the H-2A visa has long been available to growers that would allow them to bring in an unlimited number of foreign-born ag workers. Repeat for emphasis: unlimited, no cap.

Since the Labor Department authorizes H -2A visas, the process involves paperwork that employers claim is too cumbersome, a weak attempt to defend continued reliance on illegal immigrant pickers.

As for the companion to the “rotting” argument that paying higher wages to willing Americans or legal immigrant field hands translates into higher consumer costs, that, too, has been repeatedly debunked. A new Iowa State University study concluded that entirely eliminating the illegal workforce would raise farm wages substantially — by 30 percent in the short term and 15 percent in the long term — but would have little effect on consumer cost increases, a 6 percent boost in the near term and a 3 percent hike in the long term.

If asked to choose between paying pennies more for a pound of cherries and subsidizing illegal immigration so that the ag industry could reap greater profits, consumers would be near-unanimous — either pay Americans more or join the 21st century and mechanize.

The historic, tried and true solution to filling labor shortages is to pay more, not hire illegal immigrants or issue more visas.

— Joe Guzzardi is a senior writing fellow for Californians for Population Stabilization (CAPS) who now lives in Pittsburgh. He can be reached at [email protected], or follow him on Twitter: @joeguzzardi19. Click here to read previous columns. The opinions expressed are his own.

Support Noozhawk Today

You are an important ally in our mission to deliver clear, objective, high-quality professional news reporting for Santa Barbara, Goleta and the rest of Santa Barbara County. Join the Hawks Club today to help keep Noozhawk soaring.

We offer four membership levels: $5 a month, $10 a month, $25 a month or $1 a week. Payments can be made using a credit card, Apple Pay or Google Pay, or click here for information on recurring credit-card payments and a mailing address for checks.

Thank you for your vital support.

Become a Noozhawk Supporter

First name
Last name
Email
Select your monthly membership
Or choose an annual membership
×

Payment Information

Membership Subscription

You are enrolling in . Thank you for joining the Hawks Club.

Payment Method

Pay by Credit Card:

Mastercard, Visa, American Express, Discover
One click only, please!

Pay with Apple Pay or Google Pay:

Noozhawk partners with Stripe to provide secure invoicing and payments processing.
You may cancel your membership at any time by sending an email to .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address).

  • Ask
  • Vote
  • Investigate
  • Answer

Noozhawk Asks: What’s Your Question?

Welcome to Noozhawk Asks, a new feature in which you ask the questions, you help decide what Noozhawk investigates, and you work with us to find the answers.

Here’s how it works: You share your questions with us in the nearby box. In some cases, we may work with you to find the answers. In others, we may ask you to vote on your top choices to help us narrow the scope. And we’ll be regularly asking you for your feedback on a specific issue or topic.

We also expect to work together with the reader who asked the winning questions to find the answer together. Noozhawk’s objective is to come at questions from a place of curiosity and openness, and we believe a transparent collaboration is the key to achieve it.

The results of our investigation will be published here in this Noozhawk Asks section. Once or twice a month, we plan to do a review of what was asked and answered.

Thanks for asking!

Click Here to Get Started >

Reader Comments

Noozhawk is no longer accepting reader comments on our articles. Click here for the announcement. Readers are instead invited to submit letters to the editor by emailing them to [email protected]. Please provide your full name and community, as well as contact information for verification purposes only.