Monday, February 19 , 2018, 2:46 pm | Partly Cloudy 57º


Joe Guzzardi: Don’t Think Donald Trump Has Hit a Wall When It Comes to Immigration

For years, immigration enforcement advocates have urged Congress to complete a wall along the shared U.S.-Mexico border. And for an equal number of years, the immigration lobby has asserted that it can’t be done, and insisted that no wall would stop illegal immigration.

The popular argument is that a 20-foot high wall would only increase the sales of 21-foot ladders.

But since President-elect Donald Trump promised to build “a big, beautiful powerful wall,” and made that pledge the cornerstone of his immigration enforcement platform, getting the facts straight about what can and cannot be done is important.

First, Trump’s reference to a brick-and-mortar wall is metaphorical. Talk about building a wall intends to convey Trump’s commitment to aggressively deter illegal immigration, MS-13 gang members, drug and human trafficking, and terrorists.

Second, realistically, Trump would settle for what the House of Representatives is rumored to be proposing: a double-layered fence along 1,000 miles of the Southwest border. As Trump explained to Fox Business host Maria Bartiromo, the southern border has large swaths of impenetrable natural terrain, so the total fencing required would only be “a little more than 1,000 miles.”

Additionally, thousands of new border agents would be hired. Trump’s supporters would no doubt applaud double-layered fencing, since it’s quantum leaps better than the current flimsy barbed wire and virtual fence that don’t present an effective deterrent to determined migrants.

Third, the question about who will pay for the labor and materials that go into constructing the fence is another variable in the argument against building it. Mexico insists it won’t pay, but may have little choice if Trump carries out his plan to change a rule under the USA PATRIOT Act, and cut off at least some of the $25 billion that flows from to Mexico from the United States in the form of remittances. Illegal immigrants, working unlawfully in the United States, represent the largest percentage of senders.

Upon hearing of Trump’s plan, former Mexican President Vicente Fox dropped an “F-bomb,” and current President Enrique Peña Nieto more tactfully declared the idea outrageous and impossible.

Fourth, although much attention has been paid to the fence and border security in general, the bigger picture is the important one. Not only has Trump repeatedly promised a fence — music to some Americans’ ears a decade after President George W. Bush signed the Secure Fence Act that came to naught — but he’s aware of the Mexican government’s complicity in the U.S. immigration crisis.

In his June 2015 announcement for the presidency, Trump charged that Mexico “is not our friend” and “sends” troubled people to the United States who collect social services and other affirmative benefits, an opinion that the ongoing Central America border surge via Mexico confirms.

The takeaway is that after a 30-year winning streak since the 1986 Immigration Reform and Control Act that granted amnesty but never fulfilled the legislation’s enforcement provisions, pro-immigration activists are in for tough times.

The fence naysayers may claim there’s no way, but “no” is a word that seems to energize Trump. And if the federal government can build more than 50,000 miles of interstate highway, it can certainly construct 1,000 miles of border fence.

— Joe Guzzardi is a senior writing fellow for Californians for Population Stabilization (CAPS) who now lives in Pittsburgh. He can be reached at [email protected], or follow him on Twitter: @joeguzzardi19. Click here to read previous columns. The opinions expressed are his own.

  • Ask
  • Vote
  • Investigate
  • Answer

Noozhawk Asks: What’s Your Question?

Welcome to Noozhawk Asks, a new feature in which you ask the questions, you help decide what Noozhawk investigates, and you work with us to find the answers.

Here’s how it works: You share your questions with us in the nearby box. In some cases, we may work with you to find the answers. In others, we may ask you to vote on your top choices to help us narrow the scope. And we’ll be regularly asking you for your feedback on a specific issue or topic.

We also expect to work together with the reader who asked the winning questions to find the answer together. Noozhawk’s objective is to come at questions from a place of curiosity and openness, and we believe a transparent collaboration is the key to achieve it.

The results of our investigation will be published here in this Noozhawk Asks section. Once or twice a month, we plan to do a review of what was asked and answered.

Thanks for asking!

Click here to get started >

Support Noozhawk Today

You are an important ally in our mission to deliver clear, objective, high-quality professional news reporting for Santa Barbara, Goleta and the rest of Santa Barbara County. Join the Hawks Club today to help keep Noozhawk soaring.

We offer four membership levels: $5 a month, $10 a month, $25 a month or $1 a week. Payments can be made through PayPal below, or click here for information on recurring credit-card payments.

Thank you for your vital support.

Reader Comments

Noozhawk is no longer accepting reader comments on our articles. Click here for the announcement. Readers are instead invited to submit letters to the editor by emailing them to [email protected]. Please provide your full name and community, as well as contact information for verification purposes only.

Daily Noozhawk

Subscribe to Noozhawk's A.M. Report, our free e-Bulletin sent out every day at 4:15 a.m. with Noozhawk's top stories, hand-picked by the editors.

Sign Up Now >