Saturday, March 24 , 2018, 8:18 pm | A Few Clouds 59º


Joe Guzzardi: DUIs Could Mean Removal for Illegal Immigrants

Homeland Security Department Secretary John Kelly said in a recent Meet the Press interview that a wider array of criminal behavior by illegal immigrants, including DUIs, could lead to their deportation.

He added that during President Barack Obama’s administration a DUI was unlikely to result in deportation even though it would have put the alien in the DHS system.

The United States, Kelly stressed, has a legal justice process that allows it to deport aliens, and that practice is consistent with President Donald Trump’s new enforcement-first policy.

“The definition of criminal has not changed, but where on the spectrum of criminality we operate has changed,” he said.

But as clear as federal immigration laws are in their definition of who is deportable, Kelly’s frank statement that a DUI could expedite removal is certain to spark more protests that Trump’s commitment to enforcement is extreme.

The American Civil Liberties Union condemned Kelly, even before he was confirmed, for his reasonable warning that unchecked immigration represents a national security threat.

The law on what’s generally referred to as improper entry or entry without inspection is unambiguous: Whether by crossing the U.S. border alone, with a coyote’s help or buying a fake U.S. passport, a foreign national who enters the United States illegally and not through a designated port of entry can be both convicted of a crime and fined.

For the first improper entry, a civil violation, the alien can be fined or imprisoned for up to six months, or both. A subsequent offense, a felony, carries a fine or imprisonment for up to two years, or both.

Immigration laws also apply to visa overstays that make up as much as 40 percent of the 12 million illegal immigrants residing in the United States. When an alien crosses into the United States illegally or enters on a valid, legal visa but fails to depart on the designated date, Immigration and Nationality Act Section 237 applies: “Any alien who is present in the United States in violation of this Act or any other law of the United States ... is deportable.”

Despite the law’s crystal clarity, Congress’ legislative branch, which includes many lawyers, can’t agree on who should remain. For some legislators, aliens who get past the Border Patrol or visitors on a temporary visa who overstay should be allowed to remain indefinitely.

But illegal entry will never end unless laws are enforced. When immigration laws are enforced, living illegally in the United States becomes more challenging and less satisfying.

Attrition through enforcement is better for taxpayers and for foreign nationals unlawfully present. Taxpayers don’t have to spend billions of dollars to subsidize DHS’ deportation efforts, and illegal immigrants can return home on their own terms when they realize that the option — forced removal — is less appealing.

There is precedent for returning home voluntarily. According to a Pew Research Center study, between 2009 and 2014, the years that immediately followed the recession and the dried-up job market, more than 1 million Mexicans returned home; only 14 percent were deported.

The Trump administration’s stepped-up enforcement helps American citizens and legal permanent residents get jobs, and discourages future illegal immigration, already down 40 percent from Mexico during January and February.

The sharp drop in illegal immigration should encourage Trump to continue his interior enforcement commitment. He campaigned on an enforcement platform, and now he’s delivering.

— Joe Guzzardi is a senior writing fellow for Californians for Population Stabilization (CAPS) who now lives in Pittsburgh. He can be reached at [email protected], or follow him on Twitter: @joeguzzardi19. Click here to read previous columns. The opinions expressed are his own.

  • Ask
  • Vote
  • Investigate
  • Answer

Noozhawk Asks: What’s Your Question?

Welcome to Noozhawk Asks, a new feature in which you ask the questions, you help decide what Noozhawk investigates, and you work with us to find the answers.

Here’s how it works: You share your questions with us in the nearby box. In some cases, we may work with you to find the answers. In others, we may ask you to vote on your top choices to help us narrow the scope. And we’ll be regularly asking you for your feedback on a specific issue or topic.

We also expect to work together with the reader who asked the winning questions to find the answer together. Noozhawk’s objective is to come at questions from a place of curiosity and openness, and we believe a transparent collaboration is the key to achieve it.

The results of our investigation will be published here in this Noozhawk Asks section. Once or twice a month, we plan to do a review of what was asked and answered.

Thanks for asking!

Click here to get started >

Support Noozhawk Today

You are an important ally in our mission to deliver clear, objective, high-quality professional news reporting for Santa Barbara, Goleta and the rest of Santa Barbara County. Join the Hawks Club today to help keep Noozhawk soaring.

We offer four membership levels: $5 a month, $10 a month, $25 a month or $1 a week. Payments can be made through PayPal below, or click here for information on recurring credit-card payments.

Thank you for your vital support.

Reader Comments

Noozhawk is no longer accepting reader comments on our articles. Click here for the announcement. Readers are instead invited to submit letters to the editor by emailing them to [email protected]. Please provide your full name and community, as well as contact information for verification purposes only.

Daily Noozhawk

Subscribe to Noozhawk's A.M. Report, our free e-Bulletin sent out every day at 4:15 a.m. with Noozhawk's top stories, hand-picked by the editors.

Sign Up Now >