Pixel Tracker

Saturday, February 16 , 2019, 1:47 am | Fair 50º


Judge Rules 2 Men Should Stand Trial For Murder of Santa Maria Woman

Prelminary hearing ends with defendants held to answer on charges stemming from attack on Marilyn Pharis last year

Victor Aureliano Martinez, 30, center, listens to his defense attorney Lori Pedego, left, and a Spanish translator Wednesday during his preliminary hearing on charges stemming from the violent attack and death of Marilyn Pharis, 64, in July 2015. He and a co-defendant, Jose Villagomez, 21, were ordered to stand trial. Click to view larger
Victor Aureliano Martinez, 30, center, listens to his defense attorney Lori Pedego, left, and a Spanish translator Wednesday during his preliminary hearing on charges stemming from the violent attack and death of Marilyn Pharis, 64, in July 2015. He and a co-defendant, Jose Villagomez, 21, were ordered to stand trial. (Janene Scully / Noozhawk photo)

Two men charged with the violent attack on Marilyn Pharis in her Santa Maria home last year will stand trial for the woman's murder, a Santa Barbara County Superior Court judge ruled Wednesday.

Judge John McGregor handed down his ruling after listening to more than two days of evidence in the preliminary hearing for Victor Aureliano Martinez, 30, and Jose Villagomez, 21. 

The men are accused of entering a home on the 900 block of North Dejoy Street on July 24, 2015, and attacking the 64-year-old woman, who died eight days later. 

“The court will find there is sufficient evidence the following crimes occurred and that the defendants participated in them,” McGregor said. 

The pair will be tried for first-degree murder, plus numerous special circumstances, including robbery, burglary, and rape for by foreign object.

Martinez will face an additional special circumstance for torture and a special allegation for use of a deadly weapon, identified as a hammer.

Senior Deputy District Attorney Ann Bramsen told the judge a “plethora of evidence” exists in the case, adding that Pharis was severely beaten with fists, hit with a hammer, and strangled three times to the point she lost consciousness.

“What we know is Ms. Pharis was fighting for her life. She fought and fought and fought and survived,” Bramsen said. “He wasn’t going to allow that to happen so each time she regained consciousness, after he violently strangled her to the point where her hyoid bone was fractured, he would strangle her again, he would beat her again. 

“And then when she was limp and lying there, he decided to insert his fingers into her vagina. When you look at the totality of what happened, to say he didn’t intend to inflict pain and suffering for sadistic purpose just flies in the face of the facts,” Bramsen added.

The defendants blamed each other for breaking into the house and taking a bucket coins, totaling $200. A stake used to pry open the door had Martinez’s DNA on it, Bramsen said, although Villagomez also admitting participating.

Bramsen noted the testimony of Dr. Manuel Montez, forensic pathologist, who spelled out the numerous injuries Pharis suffered from the blunt-force trauma. 

Defense attorney Lori Pedego, who represents Martinez, said the case did not include any evidence Martinez intended to cause suffering or pain, or proof she was hit with a hammer.

“We have no words used by Mr. Martinez during the assault,”  Pedego said. “The cases that support a finding of torture typically are accompanied by statements … that show the intent of the perpetrator to cause the subject pain. We have none of that in this case.”

She also argued no physical evidence existed proving Martinez raped the victim, who reportedly gave different stories about whether she was sexually assaulted. 

The defense attorney contended her client never said he inserted his fingers in her vagina.

“Not only did he not say he did not do it, we have no physical evidence to support it,” she said. 

While Martinez is accused of being the primary defendant, Villagomez is alleged to have been an accomplice who was a major participant and displayed a reckless indifference to human life, Bramsen said.

“He admitted and showed his reckless indifference to human life not only during the incident, but during the interview. He shrugged his shoulders when he hears she’s dead, and then in the third interview he wants to see clear evidence she’s dead,” Bramsen said.

Upon seeing seeing Martinez assault the woman, Villagomez went to the window check if anybody was coming so they could escape if needed, Bramsen added.

Defense attorney Michael Scott, who represents Villagomez, said the men were simply looking for a vacant house to sleep in and store their possessions. 

He argued there was no proof of burglary or robbery, with conflicting reports of who took the coins, which reportedly were found in a backpack Martinez had at the time police arrested him. 

Scott also added it is not clear when Villagomez went to the window to look outside.

“Is going to the window a crime? It is not,” Scott said,

As to why Villagomez asked for pictures of the dead woman, Scott said the defendant sought proof to ensure police were telling the truth.

The judge ordered the men and attorneys to return to court for arraignment on Jan. 19.

Noozhawk North County editor Janene Scully can be reached at .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address). Follow Noozhawk on Twitter: @noozhawk, @NoozhawkNews and @NoozhawkBiz. Connect with Noozhawk on Facebook.

Talk to Us!

Please take Noozhawk's audience survey to help us understand what you expect — and want — from us. It'll take you just a few minutes. Thank you!

Get Started >

Support Noozhawk Today

You are an important ally in our mission to deliver clear, objective, high-quality professional news reporting for Santa Barbara, Goleta and the rest of Santa Barbara County. Join the Hawks Club today to help keep Noozhawk soaring.

We offer four membership levels: $5 a month, $10 a month, $25 a month or $1 a week. Payments can be made using a credit card, Apple Pay or Google Pay, or click here for information on recurring credit-card payments and a mailing address for checks.

Thank you for your vital support.

Become a Noozhawk Supporter

First name
Last name
Select your monthly membership
Or choose an annual membership

Payment Information

Membership Subscription

You are enrolling in . Thank you for joining the Hawks Club.

Payment Method

Pay by Credit Card:

Mastercard, Visa, American Express, Discover
One click only, please!

Pay with Apple Pay or Google Pay:

Noozhawk partners with Stripe to provide secure invoicing and payments processing.
You may cancel your membership at any time by sending an email to .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address).

  • Ask
  • Vote
  • Investigate
  • Answer

Noozhawk Asks: What’s Your Question?

Welcome to Noozhawk Asks, a new feature in which you ask the questions, you help decide what Noozhawk investigates, and you work with us to find the answers.

Here’s how it works: You share your questions with us in the nearby box. In some cases, we may work with you to find the answers. In others, we may ask you to vote on your top choices to help us narrow the scope. And we’ll be regularly asking you for your feedback on a specific issue or topic.

We also expect to work together with the reader who asked the winning questions to find the answer together. Noozhawk’s objective is to come at questions from a place of curiosity and openness, and we believe a transparent collaboration is the key to achieve it.

The results of our investigation will be published here in this Noozhawk Asks section. Once or twice a month, we plan to do a review of what was asked and answered.

Thanks for asking!

Click Here to Get Started >

Reader Comments

Noozhawk is no longer accepting reader comments on our articles. Click here for the announcement. Readers are instead invited to submit letters to the editor by emailing them to [email protected]. Please provide your full name and community, as well as contact information for verification purposes only.