Saturday, October 1 , 2016, 4:07 pm | Fair 73º

  • Follow Noozhawk on LinkedIn
  • Follow Noozhawk on Pinterest
  • Follow Noozhawk on YouTube
 
 
 
 

Local News

Key Community Players Discuss the Merits of Charging an Oil Extraction Fee

Tom Steyer, president of NextGen Climate, leads a roundtable dialogue in Santa Barbara about his 'Fair Shake’ initiative

What could you do with an extra $2 billion?

Most people can come up with a few answers to that query, which was posed Tuesday by a notable investor and philanthropist hoping to bring Santa Barbara into a statewide discussion, debating the merit of an oil extraction fee.

The hefty figure was presented as the annual revenue California was losing by not charging oil companies a fee to drill — the only major oil-producing state that doesn’t do so.

Key community climate activists and leaders gathered at the Santa Barbara Maritime Museum for a roundtable dialogue led by Tom Steyer, founder and president of NextGen Climate, an organization that acts (and donates) politically to ward off climate disaster.

Steyer, a San Francisco native in town to give a closed talk Tuesday at UC Santa Barbara, spent the morning in the one-hour session hosted with the Community Environmental Council to gauge whether residents would back a 9 percent oil extraction tax.

A powerhouse roster of UCSB professors, lawyers, nonprofit and school leaders also addressed who could most benefit from the extra money.

Activists debated legislation versus a ballot proposition, and if funds should be allotted for special services or just returned directly to residents.

Others cautioned revenue from oil extraction could inadvertently incentivize production.

Tom Steyer
NextGen Climate President Tom Steyer, right, an investor and philanthropist, took a brief tour of the Santa Barbara Maritime Museum on Tuesday before a roundtable discussion about oil extraction fees. (Gina Potthoff / Noozhawk photo)

“We want a fair shake for the people of California,” Steyer said, referring to his Fair Shake campaign.

UCSB student Alexandria Choate said she’s been closely following the progress of SB 1017, a bill going through the State Senate that would allocate oil extraction fees to higher education and other social services.

She said she was more optimistic for putting a proposition on the 2016 ballot.

Maricela Morales of CAUSE suggested activists take a more offensive role, helping to engage low-income communities in a conversation about environment and commercial tax reform.

Steyer agreed, explaining that Latinos, Asian Americans and African Americans were most supportive of the environment — not everyone driving around in electric cars.

Attendees said schools need more funding, a sentiment shared by Dave Cash, superintendent of the Santa Barbara Unified School District, who lamented that Proposition 30 merely staved off further cuts.

“It didn’t restore much of anything, quite frankly,” he said. “People who look like me send their kids to private schools, divorcing themselves from public education.”

Steyer said NextGen would soon release results of a poll looking at whether Californians would support an oil extraction tax.

Locals ended the conversation with a slight sense of urgency, hoping to keep the discussion going long after Steyer's visit.

Noozhawk staff writer Gina Potthoff can be reached at .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address). Follow Noozhawk on Twitter: @noozhawk, @NoozhawkNews and @NoozhawkBiz. Connect with Noozhawk on Facebook.

Reader Comments

Noozhawk's intent is not to limit the discussion of our stories but to elevate it. Comments should be relevant and must be free of profanity and abusive language and attacks.

By posting on Noozhawk, you:

» Agree to be respectful. Noozhawk encourages intelligent and impassioned discussion and debate, but now has a zero-tolerance policy for those who cannot express their opinions in a civil manner.

» Agree not to use Noozhawk’s forums for personal attacks. This includes any sort of personal attack — including, but not limited to, the people in our stories, the journalists who create these stories, fellow readers who comment on our stories, or anyone else in our community.

» Agree not to post on Noozhawk any comments that can be construed as libelous, defamatory, obscene, profane, vulgar, harmful, threatening, tortious, harassing, abusive, hateful, sexist, racially or ethnically objectionable, or that are invasive of another’s privacy.

» Agree not to post in a manner than emulates, purports or pretends to be someone else. Under no circumstances are readers posting to Noozhawk to knowingly use the name or identity of another person, whether that is another reader on this site, a public figure, celebrity, elected official or fictitious character. This also means readers will not knowingly give out any personal information of other members of these forums.

» Agree not to solicit others. You agree you will not use Noozhawk’s forums to solicit and/or advertise for personal blogs and websites, without Noozhawk’s express written approval.

Noozhawk’s management and editors, in our sole discretion, retain the right to remove individual posts or to revoke the access privileges of anyone who we believe has violated any of these terms or any other term of this agreement; however, we are under no obligation to do so.

Support Noozhawk Today

You are an important ally in our mission to deliver clear, objective, high-quality professional news reporting for Santa Barbara, Goleta and the rest of Santa Barbara County. Join the Hawks Club today to help keep Noozhawk soaring.

We offer four membership levels: $5 a month, $10 a month, $25 a month or $1 a week. Payments can be made through PayPal below, or click here for information on recurring credit-card payments.

Thank you for your vital support.



Daily Noozhawk

Subscribe to Noozhawk's A.M. Report, our free e-Bulletin sent out every day at 4:15 a.m. with Noozhawk's top stories, hand-picked by the editors.

Sign Up Now >