Friday, February 23 , 2018, 5:12 am | Fair 46º


Local News

Key Community Players Discuss the Merits of Charging an Oil Extraction Fee

Tom Steyer, president of NextGen Climate, leads a roundtable dialogue in Santa Barbara about his 'Fair Shake’ initiative

What could you do with an extra $2 billion?

Most people can come up with a few answers to that query, which was posed Tuesday by a notable investor and philanthropist hoping to bring Santa Barbara into a statewide discussion, debating the merit of an oil extraction fee.

The hefty figure was presented as the annual revenue California was losing by not charging oil companies a fee to drill — the only major oil-producing state that doesn’t do so.

Key community climate activists and leaders gathered at the Santa Barbara Maritime Museum for a roundtable dialogue led by Tom Steyer, founder and president of NextGen Climate, an organization that acts (and donates) politically to ward off climate disaster.

Steyer, a San Francisco native in town to give a closed talk Tuesday at UC Santa Barbara, spent the morning in the one-hour session hosted with the Community Environmental Council to gauge whether residents would back a 9 percent oil extraction tax.

A powerhouse roster of UCSB professors, lawyers, nonprofit and school leaders also addressed who could most benefit from the extra money.

Activists debated legislation versus a ballot proposition, and if funds should be allotted for special services or just returned directly to residents.

Others cautioned revenue from oil extraction could inadvertently incentivize production.

Tom Steyer
NextGen Climate President Tom Steyer, right, an investor and philanthropist, took a brief tour of the Santa Barbara Maritime Museum on Tuesday before a roundtable discussion about oil extraction fees. (Gina Potthoff / Noozhawk photo)

“We want a fair shake for the people of California,” Steyer said, referring to his Fair Shake campaign.

UCSB student Alexandria Choate said she’s been closely following the progress of SB 1017, a bill going through the State Senate that would allocate oil extraction fees to higher education and other social services.

She said she was more optimistic for putting a proposition on the 2016 ballot.

Maricela Morales of CAUSE suggested activists take a more offensive role, helping to engage low-income communities in a conversation about environment and commercial tax reform.

Steyer agreed, explaining that Latinos, Asian Americans and African Americans were most supportive of the environment — not everyone driving around in electric cars.

Attendees said schools need more funding, a sentiment shared by Dave Cash, superintendent of the Santa Barbara Unified School District, who lamented that Proposition 30 merely staved off further cuts.

“It didn’t restore much of anything, quite frankly,” he said. “People who look like me send their kids to private schools, divorcing themselves from public education.”

Steyer said NextGen would soon release results of a poll looking at whether Californians would support an oil extraction tax.

Locals ended the conversation with a slight sense of urgency, hoping to keep the discussion going long after Steyer's visit.

Noozhawk staff writer Gina Potthoff can be reached at .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address). Follow Noozhawk on Twitter: @noozhawk, @NoozhawkNews and @NoozhawkBiz. Connect with Noozhawk on Facebook.

  • Ask
  • Vote
  • Investigate
  • Answer

Noozhawk Asks: What’s Your Question?

Welcome to Noozhawk Asks, a new feature in which you ask the questions, you help decide what Noozhawk investigates, and you work with us to find the answers.

Here’s how it works: You share your questions with us in the nearby box. In some cases, we may work with you to find the answers. In others, we may ask you to vote on your top choices to help us narrow the scope. And we’ll be regularly asking you for your feedback on a specific issue or topic.

We also expect to work together with the reader who asked the winning questions to find the answer together. Noozhawk’s objective is to come at questions from a place of curiosity and openness, and we believe a transparent collaboration is the key to achieve it.

The results of our investigation will be published here in this Noozhawk Asks section. Once or twice a month, we plan to do a review of what was asked and answered.

Thanks for asking!

Click here to get started >

Support Noozhawk Today

You are an important ally in our mission to deliver clear, objective, high-quality professional news reporting for Santa Barbara, Goleta and the rest of Santa Barbara County. Join the Hawks Club today to help keep Noozhawk soaring.

We offer four membership levels: $5 a month, $10 a month, $25 a month or $1 a week. Payments can be made through PayPal below, or click here for information on recurring credit-card payments.

Thank you for your vital support.

Reader Comments

Noozhawk is no longer accepting reader comments on our articles. Click here for the announcement. Readers are instead invited to submit letters to the editor by emailing them to [email protected]. Please provide your full name and community, as well as contact information for verification purposes only.

Daily Noozhawk

Subscribe to Noozhawk's A.M. Report, our free e-Bulletin sent out every day at 4:15 a.m. with Noozhawk's top stories, hand-picked by the editors.

Sign Up Now >