Saturday, July 21 , 2018, 11:34 pm | Fair 66º

 
 
 
 

Leon Kolankiewicz: Barack Obama’s Environmental Legacy Mixed, and Vulnerable

In his insightful 2015 book, Presidents and the American Environment, environmental historian Otis L. Graham Jr. lumps President Barack Obama with President George W. Bush as a “wobbly leader” on the environment.

Most established environmental groups would disagree vehemently with this lackluster appraisal, but since the environmental establishment is in bed with the Democratic Party nowadays, its own opinions on Obama’s environmental legacy are suspect.

Graham, a UC Santa Barbara history professor emeritus, observes that, unlike President Theodore Roosevelt (our greatest conservation president), who was fascinated by nature even as a sickly city boy in New York City, young Obama had little interest in the nature that surrounded him on the lush, beautiful Hawaiian island of Oahu.

Graham writes:

“... life in Honolulu ... never seemed to pivot on island landscape or wildlife ... (Obama) and his biographers tell of basketball games, long walks through the city, movies seen, hanging out at Mr. Burger’s Drive-In, dabbling in beer, cocaine, marijuana. It might as well have been Topeka, Kansas, where his mother was raised.”

Graham’s observation is seconded by Time magazine senior national correspondent Michael Grunwald, who wrote: “Obama was no tree-hugger. Nature wasn’t something he felt in his gut.”

Since these unflattering words, however, Obama stepped up his environmental game, perhaps with a view to leaving behind a legacy surpassing “wobbly.”

First and foremost, he made addressing climate change a priority, which he had not in his first term. Obama helped forge the landmark 2015 international agreement on climate in Paris (COP 21), which aims to keep the average global temperature rise below the 2 degree Celsius threshold.

While the agreement has been disparaged by some climate scientists and activists as long on promises and short on commitments, it still represents a step forward.

Obama’s Clean Power Plan targets carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions from coal-fired power plants, aiming to reduce them by a third over 25 years. And he opposed the carbon-hefty Keystone XL Pipeline.

Obama also has been an ardent booster of wind and solar energy, which are greener than fossil fuels, if not cure-alls. One downside is that wind turbines kill eagles and other birds, lots of them.

Although Obama once boasted of increasing oil and gas production under his administration, he recently thrilled enviros by banning offshore drilling “permanently” across millions of acres of the Atlantic and Arctic oceans. Federal courts will have to determine just how permanent this ban really is.

In recent weeks, Obama vastly expanded a marine protected area near Hawaii that Bush had originally established.

In sum, with one significant exception, Obama’s environmental legacy is largely favorable, though not outstanding; it would certainly have been better with a more environmentally friendly and cooperative Congress rather than the recalcitrant Republicans he faced.

The exception is his push to increase U.S. population growth by boosting immigration levels. A larger population exacerbates strains on all environmental resources, a basic principle environmentalists once grasped firmly. But now they zip their lips to appease their Democratic Party masters, who view new immigrants as new Democratic voters.

It is absurd to ban oil drilling and commit to reducing CO2 emissions, all while constantly increasing the sheer number of oil consumers and CO2 emitters.

In any event, much of Obama’s positive environmental legacy is vulnerable under a Trump administration. If President-elect Donald Trump’s hostile campaign rhetoric and his early Cabinet picks are any indication, he is already striving his utmost to become the worst environmental president in American history.

Trump — whose interest in the Great Outdoors seems to extend no further than his own golf courses — is the anti-Roosevelt.

— Leon Kolankiewicz is an advisory board member and senior writing fellow for Californians for Population Stabilization (CAPS). The opinions expressed are his own.

Support Noozhawk Today

You are an important ally in our mission to deliver clear, objective, high-quality professional news reporting for Santa Barbara, Goleta and the rest of Santa Barbara County. Join the Hawks Club today to help keep Noozhawk soaring.

We offer four membership levels: $5 a month, $10 a month, $25 a month or $1 a week. Payments can be made through Stripe below, or click here for information on recurring credit-card payments and a mailing address for checks.

Thank you for your vital support.

Become a Noozhawk Supporter

First name
Last name
Enter your email
Select your membership level
×

Payment Information

You are purchasing:

Payment Method

Pay by Credit Card:

Mastercard, Visa, American Express, Discover
One click only, please!

Pay with Apple Pay or Google Pay:

Noozhawk partners with Stripe to provide secure invoicing and payments processing.

  • Ask
  • Vote
  • Investigate
  • Answer

Noozhawk Asks: What’s Your Question?

Welcome to Noozhawk Asks, a new feature in which you ask the questions, you help decide what Noozhawk investigates, and you work with us to find the answers.

Here’s how it works: You share your questions with us in the nearby box. In some cases, we may work with you to find the answers. In others, we may ask you to vote on your top choices to help us narrow the scope. And we’ll be regularly asking you for your feedback on a specific issue or topic.

We also expect to work together with the reader who asked the winning questions to find the answer together. Noozhawk’s objective is to come at questions from a place of curiosity and openness, and we believe a transparent collaboration is the key to achieve it.

The results of our investigation will be published here in this Noozhawk Asks section. Once or twice a month, we plan to do a review of what was asked and answered.

Thanks for asking!

Click Here to Get Started >

Reader Comments

Noozhawk is no longer accepting reader comments on our articles. Click here for the announcement. Readers are instead invited to submit letters to the editor by emailing them to [email protected]. Please provide your full name and community, as well as contact information for verification purposes only.

Daily Noozhawk

Subscribe to Noozhawk's A.M. Report, our free e-Bulletin sent out every day at 4:15 a.m. with Noozhawk's top stories, hand-picked by the editors.

Sign Up Now >