Pixel Tracker

Friday, March 22 , 2019, 2:14 pm | A Few Clouds 61º

 
 
 
 

Letter to the Editor: CAB Warned of Eastside Traffic Issues a Decade Ago

An open letter to the Santa Barbara City Council

Madam Mayor and Council:

Mr. Becker representing Cars Are Basic Inc. at Tuesday evening’s session made the point of the traffic study not being available to the general public from the Council Agenda web page.

This is what was and is as of 7:51 p.m. available to the general public regarding the staff report about the Eastside traffic study:

ATTACHMENT 1

THIS ATTACHMENT IS AVAILABLE FOR REVIEW IN THE CITY CLERK’S OFFICE

If, in fact, it was and is available to the general public through the Traffic Circulation Committee bookmark, then it should have easily been made available to the general public through the Council Agenda web page.

This is reminiscent to the misdirection and intentional quoting of nonfact by the City of Santa Barbara Transportation Division with the St. Francis Traffic Plan — the plan that has failed to achieve its goals — and included statements that there are statistics proving bulb-outs work (Tuesday night staff stated there are no such statistics).

A reminder here. Cars Are Basic did a community outreach in the lower Milpas/Eastside area over a decade ago. We brought to Mr. Dayton and Mayor Miller’s attention of almost every single issue before the council Tuesday evening. 

The city ignored our issues and the over-600-signature petition present in council session.

Among the issues were the problems of the 5 Points Roundabout, brought up at Tuesday’s presentation. Issues of pedestrians/bicyclists, and the unintended consequences of danger to both and greater speeds further down the streets feeding the roundabout. We urged the council to return to the intersection to an all-way stop as before. We were ignored. 

CAB brought up the issues of the “S” curve, accidents around the Milpas roundabout and Carpinteria Street that was proven significant within six months of the building of the roundabout. A standard intersection would have cost half the cost of the roundabout, solved the issue of unintended consequences, and made pedestrian and bike travel through the intersection far safer than now.

Part of the problems of traffic through the residential neighborhood is a direct result of drivers not wishing to travel the roundabout on Milpas, and learned behavior during the roundabout construction that closed most of the intersection. A direct result the former Eastside Neighborhood Organization stated would not be an issue. That is a direct statement from its then-spokesman Grant House. CAB was ignored.

If, in fact, the City of Santa Barbara traffic staff had not ignored our issues and petition of over a decade ago, most of these issues would have been solved by now, at far less expense currently facing the city.

Scott Wenz, president
Cars Are Basic

Support Noozhawk Today!

Our professional journalists work tirelessly to report on local news so you can be more informed and engaged in your community. This quality, local reporting is free for you to read and share, but it's not free to produce.

You count on us to deliver timely, relevant local news, 24/7. Can we count on you to invest in our newsroom and help secure its future?

We provide special member benefits to show how much we appreciate your support.

Email
I would like give...
Great! You're joining as a Red-Tailed Hawk!
  • Ask
  • Vote
  • Investigate
  • Answer

Noozhawk Asks: What’s Your Question?

Welcome to Noozhawk Asks, a new feature in which you ask the questions, you help decide what Noozhawk investigates, and you work with us to find the answers.

Here’s how it works: You share your questions with us in the nearby box. In some cases, we may work with you to find the answers. In others, we may ask you to vote on your top choices to help us narrow the scope. And we’ll be regularly asking you for your feedback on a specific issue or topic.

We also expect to work together with the reader who asked the winning questions to find the answer together. Noozhawk’s objective is to come at questions from a place of curiosity and openness, and we believe a transparent collaboration is the key to achieve it.

The results of our investigation will be published here in this Noozhawk Asks section. Once or twice a month, we plan to do a review of what was asked and answered.

Thanks for asking!

Click Here to Get Started >

Reader Comments

Noozhawk is no longer accepting reader comments on our articles. Click here for the announcement. Readers are instead invited to submit letters to the editor by emailing them to [email protected]. Please provide your full name and community, as well as contact information for verification purposes only.