Sunday, June 24 , 2018, 3:42 pm | Overcast 69º

 
 
 
 

Local News

Lompoc Council Meeting Filled With Complaints Over Code Enforcement, Meeting Procedures

Lompoc’s City Council quickly disposed of a few items of business on their agenda Tuesday evening, and spent the rest of the freewheeling, four-hour meeting listening to complaints — and lobbing their own criticisms — at those seated on the council dais.

Council members spent the bulk of the meeting listening to and having testy exchanges with the public and each other about code enforcement, and who has authority to decide who can sit on the council dais, where the speaker’s podium should be placed, and whether public speakers should have to stand with their posteriors facing the audience. 

A scheduled discussion about the city’s complaint-driven code enforcement program requested by Councilman Jim Mosby began with complaints from City Manager Patrick Wiemiller about a recent newspaper article, and led to charges by Mosby that his multiple properties in the city are being targeted for inconsequential or nonexistent code violations by city staff. 

Wiemiller, responding to Mosby’s remarks to a reporter that he had ignored Mosby’s request on Oct. 6 to place code enforcement on a future agenda, played a video recording of the council meeting that showed that although Mosby asked questions about code enforcement, he did not make a request to put code enforcement on a future agenda.

Mosby acknowledged the date could be incorrect, but insisted he did make a council request late last year before he renewed his request to discuss code enforcement in June.

“Your staff did tell me I was now a second-class citizen and my properties would be held to a higher standard,” Mosby said.

The discussion followed a presentation by Steve Boggs, the city’s code enforcement officer, that showed a significant increase in code enforcement cases opened and closed, most with voluntary compliance that did not result in citations. 

Wiemiller said the increased cases demonstrated the success of the staff’s coordinated efforts to follow council direction, but John Linn, a former mayor and current mayoral candidate, disagreed, suggesting it was evidence of staff overreaching.

Ultimately, no action was taken on the city’s code enforcement program — long designated as a council priority in order to improve the appearance of the city. The program has been supported by both the public and past councils for more than a decade.

Contributing to the meeting’s circus-like atmosphere, an audience member tried to stop the council discussion by shouting “point of order” repeatedly until City Attorney Joe Pannone explained only a council member can stop a council discussion using a point of order. The individual later apologized for the stream of interruptions.

At the end of the meeting, Councilman Dirk Starbuck asked for and won concurrence to hold a special meeting on transparency and to discuss state law governing public access to open meetings, known as the Ralph M. Brown Act. 

The workshop on transparency has been requested repeatedly by resident Jane Behr, whose complaints about a Brown Act violation during a discussion held in closed session last year resulted in a warning letter from the county District Attorney’s Office in June.

Behr is also the campaign manager for Linn, who is running for mayor against current Mayor Bob Lingl. 

At the request of Councilman Victor Vega, the council agreed to a future discussion about who controls the use of council chambers, the placement of the speaker’s podium and who should be allowed to sit on the council dais. Currently, the city clerk, city attorney, city manager and assistant city manager sit on the elevated dais along with the five council members. 

After the meeting ended, Mosby approached reporters to announce that what transpired at the meeting had convinced him that he will run for one of two open council seats in November. 

“I need to continue being a strong liaison between residents and City Hall,” Mosby said.

In one of the few business items approved at the meeting, Summit View Homes, a residential development near Harris Grade Road that will be annexed into city limits, received its final approvals to begin construction of 44 homes. Construction is expected to take about 18 months. 

Noozhawk contributing writer Carol Benham can be reached at .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address).Follow Noozhawk on Twitter: @noozhawk, @NoozhawkNews and @NoozhawkBiz. Connect with Noozhawk on Facebook.

Support Noozhawk Today

You are an important ally in our mission to deliver clear, objective, high-quality professional news reporting for Santa Barbara, Goleta and the rest of Santa Barbara County. Join the Hawks Club today to help keep Noozhawk soaring.

We offer four membership levels: $5 a month, $10 a month, $25 a month or $1 a week. Payments can be made through PayPal below, or click here for information on recurring credit-card payments.

Thank you for your vital support.

Become a Noozhawk Supporter

First name
Last name
Enter your email
Select your membership level
×

Payment Information

You are purchasing:

Payment Method

Pay by Credit Card:

Mastercard, Visa, American Express, Discover

Pay with Apple Pay or Google Pay:

Noozhawk partners with Stripe to provide secure invoicing and payments processing.

  • Ask
  • Vote
  • Investigate
  • Answer

Noozhawk Asks: What’s Your Question?

Welcome to Noozhawk Asks, a new feature in which you ask the questions, you help decide what Noozhawk investigates, and you work with us to find the answers.

Here’s how it works: You share your questions with us in the nearby box. In some cases, we may work with you to find the answers. In others, we may ask you to vote on your top choices to help us narrow the scope. And we’ll be regularly asking you for your feedback on a specific issue or topic.

We also expect to work together with the reader who asked the winning questions to find the answer together. Noozhawk’s objective is to come at questions from a place of curiosity and openness, and we believe a transparent collaboration is the key to achieve it.

The results of our investigation will be published here in this Noozhawk Asks section. Once or twice a month, we plan to do a review of what was asked and answered.

Thanks for asking!

Click Here to Get Started >

Reader Comments

Noozhawk is no longer accepting reader comments on our articles. Click here for the announcement. Readers are instead invited to submit letters to the editor by emailing them to [email protected]. Please provide your full name and community, as well as contact information for verification purposes only.

Daily Noozhawk

Subscribe to Noozhawk's A.M. Report, our free e-Bulletin sent out every day at 4:15 a.m. with Noozhawk's top stories, hand-picked by the editors.

Sign Up Now >