Friday, November 24 , 2017, 6:44 am | Fair 48º

 
 
 
 

Local News

Lompoc City Council Starts Crafting Marijuana Regulations

Panel moves toward allowing dispensaries and establishing other rules for medical and recreational cannabis

Some 75 people, many carrying signs, attended a special Lompoc City Council meeting on marijuana regulations Tuesday night. Click to view larger
Some 75 people, many carrying signs, attended a special Lompoc City Council meeting on marijuana regulations Tuesday night. (Janene Scully / Noozhawk photo)

Lompoc City Council members have begun hashing out how they want to regulate medical and recreational marijuana after declining to adopt any bans involving an industry eyed as a future city revenue source.

The discussion Tuesday night attracted approximately 75 people for the more than 3-hour meeting, where the council settled many matters and referred others to an ad-hoc committee for fine-tuning.

The council scheduled the special meeting after deciding during an Aug. 1 session that the complex topic needed its own session.

Last November, California voters adopted Proposition 64, allowing limited recreational uses of marijuana with sales to start Jan. 1.

However, any city that fails to implement rules by Jan. 1 will lose local control, City Attorney Joe Pannone said.

Council members weighed in on indoor and outdoor personal cultivation, appeared set to ask voters in November 2018 to approve a tax, with the details yet to be decided, and agreed to ban smoking of marijuana in city parks, even where tobacco is allowed. 

Medical marijuana dispensaries will be allowed, although some discussion occurred on whether to hold a lottery to pick who could operate in Lompoc. 

“I think we should allow dispensaries. I think it needs some more research as to what those limitations are and what those boundaries are,” Councilwoman Jenelle Osborne said.

She suggested starting with a limited number, and choosing them by lottery from those paying an application fee, adding that she wants to remove possible politics from the decision to ensure everyone has an equal opportunity.

Other communities that adopted regulations restricted the number of dispensaries for the first few years, she said. 

“There is ways to stage this, where we make sure that we go through an application process that is very thorough, where we have a system that maintains that we are handing out permits to those who have their license from the state in a way that’s equitable, that potentially on the application gives points to those who live local,” Osborne said.

She also noted that the council needs to decide a number of other issues regarding dispensaries, including if retail dispensaries would be limited to just H Street or Ocean Avenue or some other area. 

“There are a multitude of things that I don’t want to duplicate if the state’s already put in place, but we may need to fine tune for our community,” she said. 

Councilman Jim Mosby noted that the city doesn’t regulate the number of pharmacies or wineries. Additionally, landlords who won’t lease to a cannabis company will help control the number of dispensaries, he added.

“I think the free market’s going to limit it significantly,” Mosby said. “You don’t want 100 of them. I don’t think free market would allow 100. They’d be out of business shortly and they’d cannibalize each other.”

Mayor Bob Lingl raised concerns about security issues, but the remaining council members appeared lukewarm to spelling out requirements.

“It’s somebody’s business. They’re going to do what they have to secure it,” Councilman Dirk Starbuck said, noting that the local gun shop has its own security cameras and lighting. “It’s the same. Leave it up to business owner or the dispensary owner.” 

Most of the speakers at Tuesday’s meeting urged the council to allow cannibis, saying it was crucial to their physical- and mental-health issues while others questioned the safety and medical benefits. 

The ad hoc committee of Osborne and Councilman Victor Vega will work with the city attorney in drafting the proposed regulations to present to the council this fall for approval by Nov. 21 to meet the Jan. 1 deadline.

Noozhawk North County editor Janene Scully can be reached at .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address). Follow Noozhawk on Twitter: @noozhawk, @NoozhawkNews and @NoozhawkBiz. Connect with Noozhawk on Facebook.

  • Ask
  • Vote
  • Investigate
  • Answer

Noozhawk Asks: What’s Your Question?

Welcome to Noozhawk Asks, a new feature in which you ask the questions, you help decide what Noozhawk investigates, and you work with us to find the answers.

Here’s how it works: You share your questions with us in the nearby box. In some cases, we may work with you to find the answers. In others, we may ask you to vote on your top choices to help us narrow the scope. And we’ll be regularly asking you for your feedback on a specific issue or topic.

We also expect to work together with the reader who asked the winning questions to find the answer together. Noozhawk’s objective is to come at questions from a place of curiosity and openness, and we believe a transparent collaboration is the key to achieve it.

The results of our investigation will be published here in this Noozhawk Asks section. Once or twice a month, we plan to do a review of what was asked and answered.

Thanks for asking!

Click here to get started >

Support Noozhawk Today

You are an important ally in our mission to deliver clear, objective, high-quality professional news reporting for Santa Barbara, Goleta and the rest of Santa Barbara County. Join the Hawks Club today to help keep Noozhawk soaring.

We offer four membership levels: $5 a month, $10 a month, $25 a month or $1 a week. Payments can be made through PayPal below, or click here for information on recurring credit-card payments.

Thank you for your vital support.



Daily Noozhawk

Subscribe to Noozhawk's A.M. Report, our free e-Bulletin sent out every day at 4:15 a.m. with Noozhawk's top stories, hand-picked by the editors.

Sign Up Now >