Saturday, August 18 , 2018, 9:35 pm | Fair with Haze 67º


Local News

Lompoc Residents Tell City Council About Battle for Privacy with Neighbor’s Drone

Dave Marston and his neighbors are in a battle with an unwelcome “Peeping Tom” drone and Tuesday night they took their fight for privacy to City Hall.

Armed with photographs and legal research, Marston asked Lompoc City Council members to enforce state laws against “the growing nuisance and threat to our privacy” from drones equipped with high-definition cameras.

“We have an individual … that flies a drone over an area spanning a one- to two-block radius around our neighborhood,” Marston said.

Marston said the DJI Phantom drone is equipped with an ultra high-definition camera that allows the operator “to see what the camera sees in real time and possibly record it.”

“On several occasions we’ve seen this guy’s drone through the window shade opening over the the street while we’re sitting in our living room watching TV. If we can see him, then he can most certainly see us, and you too,” Marston said.

“Although I speak from experience, this issue will affect the privacy of all residents in the future and it’s already affecting many in our neighborhood.”

Marston said other neighbors have reported “witnessing this drone observing their activities in their backyards.”

One neighbor, Gale Dodds, said the drone has become a real problem for the area.

“We were all at a birthday party and this drone was flying and staying stationery and watching the kids, all kinds of kids. It’s really scary,” Dodds said.

Marston said he located the drone operator — a neighbor a block away — and asked him to stop flying over people’s homes.

According to Marston, the drone operator became angry and confrontational, and “said I didn’t own the airspace and that he would continue to fly anytime and anywhere he pleased.”

Marston reported the encounter and the invasive drone to Lompoc Police Department on three occasions, but could only convince officers to file a report.

“Since this technology is so new, they just don’t know how to respond,” Marston said.

That’s when Marston decided to investigate what the law says about drones and privacy and discovered the law was on his side.

Last year,  the California Legislature passed a law — Assembly Bill 856 — extending the definition of physical invasion of privacy to include “the airspace above the land of another person without permission" with restrictions geared toward paparazzi. However, Gov. Jerry Brown in September vetoed Sen. Hannah-Beth Jackson's Senate Bill 142, which had sought to regulate unmanned aerial vehicles by prohibiting drones from trespassing on private property without the owner’s permission.

Marston also discovered a section of the state penal code — known as the “Peeping Tom” law — that makes it a crime to peer, via cameras, binoculars, periscopes, and recording devices, “into the interior of an area in which the occupant has a reasonable expectation of privacy.”

“A drone is the new periscope,” Marston said.

The Federal Aviation Administration also has regulations governing the use of drones, requiring drone operators to register drones over 0.55 pounds and avoiding areas near airports.

All of Lompoc is within five miles of the Lompoc Airport, Marston said, and no drones have been registered according to a city official.

“These civil and penal codes are enough to protect our citizens from creeps that want to trespass and invade our privacy using this technology and they should be prosecuted like the criminals they are,” Marston said.

“We want to take the lead and act right now before the proliferation of drone technology gets out of hand, and invades our privacy and all of our backyards.”

Marston also suggested the city prohibit registered sex offenders from operating drones because the technology could be exploited to allow an offender to observe children without being physically present in excluded zones around children or schools.

Marston’s research paid off Tuesday when Mayor Bob Lingl won approval from the council to direct the city attorney and staff to address the use of drones in city codes.

Police Chief Pat Walsh said he would be excited to work with Marston and the city attorney on a new city ordinance and law enforcement procedures for drones.

“This is not the first time I’ve heard of this,” Walsh said.

“Somebody has about a 5-foot diameter drone that followed somebody out of town at 3 o’clock in the morning, which I think is kind of weird. I think he’s onto something.”

Noozhawk contributing writer Carol Benham is a longtime local journalist who lives in Lompoc. Follow Noozhawk on Twitter: @noozhawk, @NoozhawkNews and @NoozhawkBiz. Connect with Noozhawk on Facebook.

Support Noozhawk Today

You are an important ally in our mission to deliver clear, objective, high-quality professional news reporting for Santa Barbara, Goleta and the rest of Santa Barbara County. Join the Hawks Club today to help keep Noozhawk soaring.

We offer four membership levels: $5 a month, $10 a month, $25 a month or $1 a week. Payments can be made through Stripe below, or click here for information on recurring credit-card payments and a mailing address for checks.

Thank you for your vital support.

Become a Noozhawk Supporter

First name
Last name
Enter your email
Select your membership level

Payment Information

You are purchasing:

Payment Method

Pay by Credit Card:

Mastercard, Visa, American Express, Discover
One click only, please!

Pay with Apple Pay or Google Pay:

Noozhawk partners with Stripe to provide secure invoicing and payments processing.

  • Ask
  • Vote
  • Investigate
  • Answer

Noozhawk Asks: What’s Your Question?

Welcome to Noozhawk Asks, a new feature in which you ask the questions, you help decide what Noozhawk investigates, and you work with us to find the answers.

Here’s how it works: You share your questions with us in the nearby box. In some cases, we may work with you to find the answers. In others, we may ask you to vote on your top choices to help us narrow the scope. And we’ll be regularly asking you for your feedback on a specific issue or topic.

We also expect to work together with the reader who asked the winning questions to find the answer together. Noozhawk’s objective is to come at questions from a place of curiosity and openness, and we believe a transparent collaboration is the key to achieve it.

The results of our investigation will be published here in this Noozhawk Asks section. Once or twice a month, we plan to do a review of what was asked and answered.

Thanks for asking!

Click Here to Get Started >

Reader Comments

Noozhawk is no longer accepting reader comments on our articles. Click here for the announcement. Readers are instead invited to submit letters to the editor by emailing them to [email protected]. Please provide your full name and community, as well as contact information for verification purposes only.

Daily Noozhawk

Subscribe to Noozhawk's A.M. Report, our free e-Bulletin sent out every day at 4:15 a.m. with Noozhawk's top stories, hand-picked by the editors.

Sign Up Now >