Pixel Tracker

Monday, December 17 , 2018, 7:20 am | Overcast 53º


Mark Shields: 3 Memorable American Presidents and the Truth

There have been three memorable American presidents, the story goes. President George Washington could never tell a lie. President Richard Nixon could never tell the truth. And President Donald Trump cannot tell the difference.

At a White House news conference, Trump referred to his 2016 victory, in which he received 304 electoral votes, as “the biggest Electoral College win since Ronald Reagan,” who was re-elected in 1984.


After Reagan and before Trump, Presidents George H.W. Bush, Bill Clinton and Barack Obama each won many more electoral votes than did Trump.

When NBC’s Peter Alexander pointed out Trump’s misstatement to him, he responded: “I don’t know. I was given that information. Actually, I’ve seen that information around.”

The changing explanations for Trump’s firing of FBI Director James Comey — in a way calculated to publicly and personally humiliate the director through his learning about his termination over cable TV news while he was in Los Angeles thanking FBI employees — remind us again of Trump’s only intermittent flirtations with candor.

The earnest and nonthreatening vice president, Mike Pence, assured the nation: “Let me be very clear that the president’s decision to accept the recommendation of the deputy attorney general (Rod Rosenstein, in case you forgot) and the attorney general (Jeff Sessions) to remove Director Comey ... was based solely and exclusively on his commitment to the best interest of the American people and to ensuring that the FBI has the trust and confidence of the people of this nation.”

In less measured prose, this had also been the rationale for Trump’s sacking of Comey offered by a succession of White House spokespeople.

Pence might want to first check the most recent Wall Street Journal/NBC News poll, which asked voters their positive or negative feelings toward a number of well-known individuals and institutions.

Pence’s favorite House speaker, Rep. Paul Ryan, R-Wis., was low man. Ryan’s negative score was 18 percentage points higher than his positive score. The Republican Party’s negative score was 16 points higher. And Trump himself had a negative score that was 11 points higher than his positive score.

U.S. Supreme Court Justice Neil Gorsuch, the National Rifle Association, Obama and Planned Parenthood all received net positive scores.

But at the top of the list, with a net positive-over-negative rating of 29 percentage points, was the “beleaguered” Federal Bureau of Investigation.

The official White House-VP explanations were exposed as untrue.

Rosenstein complained to White House counsel Don McGahn, insisting that the White House-Pence statements were misleading and wrong. He claimed that Trump had on May 8 asked him for his May 9 letter on Comey’s performance and that Rosenstein had never explicitly called for his dismissal.

But Rosenstein, a career federal prosecutor who was previously respected by both Democrats and Republicans, had been used to mislead the news media and the public on why Comey was fired.

Question: Can we think of one individual whose reputation for personal and professional integrity has not been sullied or diminished by that individual’s close identification with the Trump White House?

But never mind. Trump told NBC News, “Regardless of (the deputy attorney general’s) recommendation, I was going to fire Comey.” He said Comey was guilty of being a “showboat” and a “​grandstander.” Being called a showboat by the narcissist in the Oval Office is like being called ugly by a frog.

The credibility of and public confidence in this White House and its elected occupant are being depleted almost daily.

Does Trump have the courage or the self-confidence that President Gerald Ford did in October 1974 when he became the first U.S. president since Abraham Lincoln to voluntarily testify before Congress in defending his pardon of the disgraced Nixon?

For this presidency, time is short and the challenge is grave.

Mark Shields is one of the most widely recognized political commentators in the United States. The former Washington Post editorial columnist appears regularly on CNN, on public television and on radio. Click here to contact him, or click here to read previous columns. The opinions expressed are his own.

Support Noozhawk Today

You are an important ally in our mission to deliver clear, objective, high-quality professional news reporting for Santa Barbara, Goleta and the rest of Santa Barbara County. Join the Hawks Club today to help keep Noozhawk soaring.

We offer four membership levels: $5 a month, $10 a month, $25 a month or $1 a week. Payments can be made using a credit card, Apple Pay or Google Pay, or click here for information on recurring credit-card payments and a mailing address for checks.

Thank you for your vital support.

Become a Noozhawk Supporter

First name
Last name
Select your monthly membership
Or choose an annual membership

Payment Information

Membership Subscription

You are enrolling in . Thank you for joining the Hawks Club.

Payment Method

Pay by Credit Card:

Mastercard, Visa, American Express, Discover
One click only, please!

Pay with Apple Pay or Google Pay:

Noozhawk partners with Stripe to provide secure invoicing and payments processing.
You may cancel your membership at any time by sending an email to .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address).

  • Ask
  • Vote
  • Investigate
  • Answer

Noozhawk Asks: What’s Your Question?

Welcome to Noozhawk Asks, a new feature in which you ask the questions, you help decide what Noozhawk investigates, and you work with us to find the answers.

Here’s how it works: You share your questions with us in the nearby box. In some cases, we may work with you to find the answers. In others, we may ask you to vote on your top choices to help us narrow the scope. And we’ll be regularly asking you for your feedback on a specific issue or topic.

We also expect to work together with the reader who asked the winning questions to find the answer together. Noozhawk’s objective is to come at questions from a place of curiosity and openness, and we believe a transparent collaboration is the key to achieve it.

The results of our investigation will be published here in this Noozhawk Asks section. Once or twice a month, we plan to do a review of what was asked and answered.

Thanks for asking!

Click Here to Get Started >

Reader Comments

Noozhawk is no longer accepting reader comments on our articles. Click here for the announcement. Readers are instead invited to submit letters to the editor by emailing them to [email protected]. Please provide your full name and community, as well as contact information for verification purposes only.

Daily Noozhawk

Subscribe to Noozhawk's A.M. Report, our free e-Bulletin sent out every day at 4:15 a.m. with Noozhawk's top stories, hand-picked by the editors.

Sign Up Now >