Tuesday, February 20 , 2018, 11:09 am | Fair 54º

 
 
 
 
Advice

Mark Shields: Americans Ignoring the Growing Numbers of Impoverished Children

With no prompting, the stranger standing next to you in line will volunteer, after checking his pedometer, how many steps he has already taken today, as well as how many miles per gallon his hybrid is getting.

You may already know that among the baseball teams in the playoffs, the St. Louis Cardinals’ pitching staff has the lowest earned-run average, allowing just 2.94 runs per game, or that of all the movies that have won the Oscar for best picture, the lowest-grossing one at the domestic box office after adjusting for inflation was 2008’s The Hurt Locker, which made $14.7 million.

We Americans are frankly numbers-addicted. We measure our progress.

In the past five years, the nation’s economy has added 12 million jobs. The year the United States elected Barack Obama president, the country had 359 billionaires.

Now, according to Forbes, there are 536 billionaires, 131 of them in California alone, but the nation’s median household income, which peaked at $56,895 in 1999, was just $53,657 in 2014.

What these numbers do and do not mean — and who, if anyone, deserves any credit or blame for them — will be argued about from now until our next national Election Day, Nov. 8, 2016.

There remains one surpassingly important national statistic that no Democratic or Republican contender has the courage, the conscience or the honesty to confront: In 2008, we in these blessed United States had living among us in poverty — which is defined as an annual income below $23,550, less than $67 a day, for an average family of four — some 13,241,000 children.

In the resurgent America of 2014, where billionaires were growing like crabgrass and where half the members of Congress were millionaires, we had actually increased the number of poor American children — innocent human beings who, by definition, depend upon their elders for food, shelter, protection and guidance — by 2.5 million, to 15,740,000.

This is not just an unwelcome or embarrassing number. It is a national disgrace.

Contrast the record in our shameful treatment of children with the country’s record improvement in the well-being of older Americans.

In 1960, some 35 percent of Americans older than 65 lived below the poverty threshold. A half-century later, primarily because of the direct dollars from Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid — SS provides more than 70 percent of the income for a big majority of seniors — only 10 percent of seniors, compared with 22 percent of children, live in poverty.

So the same people, you and I, who determined to cut poverty among seniors by a smashing 71 percent looked the other way while over the past six years the poverty rate among the most defenseless in our midst, America’s children, was allowed to climb by 16 percent.

As we all know, senior citizens do vote, and they are not timid about lobbying candidates on their own behalf. (Haven’t heard many bold initiatives from the 2016 presidential field recently for cutting Medicare.)

We also know that kids, especially poorer kids, do not have political action committees, which could buy a table — and some influence — at a congressman’s next fundraising dinner.

Credit Greg Weiner for reminding us in his splendid most recent book, American Burke: The Uncommon Liberalism of Daniel Patrick Moynihan, that the New York giant warned how tragically exceptional America would be as “the first society in history in which the poorest group in the population were children.”

Moynihan’s relentless answer was to “get more money directly into the hands of the poor.”

Let us demand that the dramatic reduction of poverty among American children be an urgent public priority, almost as important as eliminating the inheritance tax on billionaires, in the 2016 presidential campaign.

What is each candidate’s commitment? How will we measure our progress? Who will answer the cry of the innocent children? We cannot look away.

Mark Shields is one of the most widely recognized political commentators in the United States. The former Washington Post editorial columnist appears regularly on CNN, on public television and on radio. Click here to contact him, or click here to read previous columns. The opinions expressed are his own.

  • Ask
  • Vote
  • Investigate
  • Answer

Noozhawk Asks: What’s Your Question?

Welcome to Noozhawk Asks, a new feature in which you ask the questions, you help decide what Noozhawk investigates, and you work with us to find the answers.

Here’s how it works: You share your questions with us in the nearby box. In some cases, we may work with you to find the answers. In others, we may ask you to vote on your top choices to help us narrow the scope. And we’ll be regularly asking you for your feedback on a specific issue or topic.

We also expect to work together with the reader who asked the winning questions to find the answer together. Noozhawk’s objective is to come at questions from a place of curiosity and openness, and we believe a transparent collaboration is the key to achieve it.

The results of our investigation will be published here in this Noozhawk Asks section. Once or twice a month, we plan to do a review of what was asked and answered.

Thanks for asking!

Click here to get started >

Support Noozhawk Today

You are an important ally in our mission to deliver clear, objective, high-quality professional news reporting for Santa Barbara, Goleta and the rest of Santa Barbara County. Join the Hawks Club today to help keep Noozhawk soaring.

We offer four membership levels: $5 a month, $10 a month, $25 a month or $1 a week. Payments can be made through PayPal below, or click here for information on recurring credit-card payments.

Thank you for your vital support.



Reader Comments

Noozhawk is no longer accepting reader comments on our articles. Click here for the announcement. Readers are instead invited to submit letters to the editor by emailing them to [email protected]. Please provide your full name and community, as well as contact information for verification purposes only.

Daily Noozhawk

Subscribe to Noozhawk's A.M. Report, our free e-Bulletin sent out every day at 4:15 a.m. with Noozhawk's top stories, hand-picked by the editors.

Sign Up Now >