Pixel Tracker

Saturday, December 15 , 2018, 6:07 am | Fair 41º


Mark Shields: Democrats Unnerved by Poll Question About Hillary Clinton’s Honesty

Hillary Clinton, according to the reliable Wall Street Journal/NBC News poll released earlier this month, defines the 2016 presidential race.

A plurality of voters now find the former secretary of state being “knowledgeable and experienced enough to handle the presidency,” “effective” and able to get “things done,” “willing to compromise and find consensus” and “compassionate enough to understand average people” — historically qualities prized by the presidential electorate.

Clinton is currently the voters’ choice when matched against all Republicans, including former Florida Gov. Jeb Bush, Wisconsin Gov. Scott Walker, Sen. Marco Rubio of Florida and Sen. Rand Paul of Kentucky.

But the answer to one question on the poll made more than a few Democrats, already nervous about their party’s prospects of winning a third consecutive White House term, break into a cold sweat: Do you think Clinton is “honest and straightforward”?

About a year ago, voters split almost right down the middle (38 percent yes, 40 percent no) when asked that question. But today just one in four respondents — a drop of 13 percentage points — judge the Democratic front-runner to be “honest and straightforward,” while one-half of voters give Clinton the thumbs-down as lacking those qualities of candor and integrity.

Obviously, context does matter. This poll was taken after news coverage of Clinton’s use of a private email server, widely seen as intended to avoid public oversight, and during the continuing controversy about the Clinton Foundation’s seeking and accepting large contributions from foreign governments and private companies with interests in winning favor with a former secretary of state or a future president.

But almost always when an American president seeks to forge a consensus on painfully difficult national issues, especially when the proposed compromise calls for citizen sacrifice, that president needs the nation’s voters to trust and to believe him — or her.

One leading Democrat who would almost certainly back her in November 2016 accuses her and her campaign of “egregiously bad judgment” in her decision, upon leaving the State Department in February 2013, to entangle herself with the foundation and to go about collecting six-figure honoraria for speeches. “​Bill Clinton made $104 million in speeches from 2001 through 2014. She was either in the Senate or the Cabinet and financially ‘pure.’ Did nobody — or her own moral compass — tell her that her speech fees and her renewed association with the foundation would become political and press disasters?”

Clinton remains overwhelmingly popular among Democratic voters, a remarkable 86 percent of whom could now see themselves backing her White House bid — contrasted with just 13 percent who could not.

Bill Clinton remains the most popular U.S. president of the past quarter-century. But when, in an interview with NBC News’ Cynthia McFadden, he insisted that the Clinton Foundation has done nothing “knowingly inappropriate,” he reminded us, unhappily, of his stained second term and other tortured verbal constructions — such as “it depends upon what the meaning of the word ‘is’ is” and “I did not have sexual relations with that woman, Miss Lewinsky.”

It forces us to wonder whether “knowingly inappropriate” will someday require further explanation.

If voters suspect that you as a candidate are not intellectually heavy enough, you, to rebut the charge, can write a thoughtful book, study hard and demonstrate mastery of a complicated subject.

But what can you do if a growing majority of voters believe that you are not honest or straightforward beyond changing the subject to your opponents’ shortcomings? Stay tuned. We may find out.

Mark Shields is one of the most widely recognized political commentators in the United States. The former Washington Post editorial columnist appears regularly on CNN, on public television and on radio. Click here to contact him, or click here to read previous columns. The opinions expressed are his own.

Support Noozhawk Today

You are an important ally in our mission to deliver clear, objective, high-quality professional news reporting for Santa Barbara, Goleta and the rest of Santa Barbara County. Join the Hawks Club today to help keep Noozhawk soaring.

We offer four membership levels: $5 a month, $10 a month, $25 a month or $1 a week. Payments can be made using a credit card, Apple Pay or Google Pay, or click here for information on recurring credit-card payments and a mailing address for checks.

Thank you for your vital support.

Become a Noozhawk Supporter

First name
Last name
Select your monthly membership
Or choose an annual membership

Payment Information

Membership Subscription

You are enrolling in . Thank you for joining the Hawks Club.

Payment Method

Pay by Credit Card:

Mastercard, Visa, American Express, Discover
One click only, please!

Pay with Apple Pay or Google Pay:

Noozhawk partners with Stripe to provide secure invoicing and payments processing.
You may cancel your membership at any time by sending an email to .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address).

  • Ask
  • Vote
  • Investigate
  • Answer

Noozhawk Asks: What’s Your Question?

Welcome to Noozhawk Asks, a new feature in which you ask the questions, you help decide what Noozhawk investigates, and you work with us to find the answers.

Here’s how it works: You share your questions with us in the nearby box. In some cases, we may work with you to find the answers. In others, we may ask you to vote on your top choices to help us narrow the scope. And we’ll be regularly asking you for your feedback on a specific issue or topic.

We also expect to work together with the reader who asked the winning questions to find the answer together. Noozhawk’s objective is to come at questions from a place of curiosity and openness, and we believe a transparent collaboration is the key to achieve it.

The results of our investigation will be published here in this Noozhawk Asks section. Once or twice a month, we plan to do a review of what was asked and answered.

Thanks for asking!

Click Here to Get Started >

Reader Comments

Noozhawk is no longer accepting reader comments on our articles. Click here for the announcement. Readers are instead invited to submit letters to the editor by emailing them to [email protected]. Please provide your full name and community, as well as contact information for verification purposes only.