Pixel Tracker

Monday, January 21 , 2019, 7:33 pm | Fair 55º


Mark Shields: Late Howard Baker a Little Giant, But Too Bipartisan for GOP

Back in the dark days — before the invention of cable news, texting and Twitter — there were a couple-dozen, mostly newspaper, almost all male reporters who covered U.S. politics nearly full time. They could be found in the last weeks before the Iowa presidential caucuses, up until “last call” at the bar of the Renaissance Des Moines Savery Hotel. Later the political media moved to New Hampshire and after-hours refreshments at Manchester’s Sheraton Wayfarer. During those late-night sessions, when reporters’ private opinions that never made it into print were voiced, I remember the personal presidential preference of the allegedly liberal political media, more often than not, being a short, southern Republican — Sen. Howard Baker of Tennessee.

Baker did have an abundance of the qualities we have come to prize in a successful presidential leader. He was intellectually honest, personally appealing, as articulate as he was analytical. Unlike too many score-settling pols, he never had an “enemies list.” He liked politics, and he was very good at his chosen profession. Nonconfrontational and nonbombastic, Baker was completely comfortable being Baker.

Those strengths of mind and character, which would have served Baker and his nation well if he had become president, turned out to be liabilities for him as a presidential candidate. Persuasive but soft-spoken, Baker refused to pose as some counterfeit, angry man just to woo primary voters in his increasingly anti-Washington party. In 1980, he was the Republican leader of the Senate, a full-time job, and ran behind two full-time candidates, Ronald Reagan and George H.W. Bush, neither of whom had a day job to distract him.

Two weeks before that year’s Detroit convention, Baker called Reagan and took himself out of logical consideration for the vice-presidential nomination — which might have provided him, as it did Bush, with a route to the Oval Office — because of compelling “family reasons.”

In fact, Baker repeatedly took himself out of consideration for the Republican national ticket by being insufficiently partisan. The first Republican ever elected to the Senate from Tennessee and named GOP Senate leader, Baker alienated, permanently it turned out, his party’s conservative base by supporting the Panama Canal Treaty, which had been negotiated by President Jimmy Carter, a Democrat. He also, unlike most of his Republican colleagues, supported the Strategic Arms Limitation Talks (SALT) with the Soviets to reduce the threat of nuclear war.

After Reagan's election and, with Baker’s skilled legislative leadership, the enactment of his tax cuts, mushrooming budget deficits followed. In 1982, then-Senate Majority Leader Baker walked across the Capitol to the office of House Speaker Thomas P. “Tip” O’Neill, D-Mass. The two men, both professionals and grown-ups, in short order agreed on a bipartisan agreement to raise the gasoline tax in order to complete and repair the nation’s highways and bridges, what had been since the shock of the OPEC price hike of oil unimaginable. What that led to, of course, was the major tax-increase bill that Reagan — who had pledged never to raise taxes — unenthusiastically signed into law.

It may have been the kiss of death that Baker was the preferred favorite of so many political reporters who covered him. Baker may have been only 5 feet 7 inches, but he was truly the Little Giant. And yes, he would have been one helluva president.

Baker died June 26, 2014, of complications from a recent stroke. He was 88.

Mark Shields is one of the most widely recognized political commentators in the United States. The former Washington Post editorial columnist appears regularly on CNN, on public television and on radio. Click here to contact him, or click here to read previous columns. The opinions expressed are his own.

Support Noozhawk Today

You are an important ally in our mission to deliver clear, objective, high-quality professional news reporting for Santa Barbara, Goleta and the rest of Santa Barbara County. Join the Hawks Club today to help keep Noozhawk soaring.

We offer four membership levels: $5 a month, $10 a month, $25 a month or $1 a week. Payments can be made using a credit card, Apple Pay or Google Pay, or click here for information on recurring credit-card payments and a mailing address for checks.

Thank you for your vital support.

Become a Noozhawk Supporter

First name
Last name
Select your monthly membership
Or choose an annual membership

Payment Information

Membership Subscription

You are enrolling in . Thank you for joining the Hawks Club.

Payment Method

Pay by Credit Card:

Mastercard, Visa, American Express, Discover
One click only, please!

Pay with Apple Pay or Google Pay:

Noozhawk partners with Stripe to provide secure invoicing and payments processing.
You may cancel your membership at any time by sending an email to .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address).

  • Ask
  • Vote
  • Investigate
  • Answer

Noozhawk Asks: What’s Your Question?

Welcome to Noozhawk Asks, a new feature in which you ask the questions, you help decide what Noozhawk investigates, and you work with us to find the answers.

Here’s how it works: You share your questions with us in the nearby box. In some cases, we may work with you to find the answers. In others, we may ask you to vote on your top choices to help us narrow the scope. And we’ll be regularly asking you for your feedback on a specific issue or topic.

We also expect to work together with the reader who asked the winning questions to find the answer together. Noozhawk’s objective is to come at questions from a place of curiosity and openness, and we believe a transparent collaboration is the key to achieve it.

The results of our investigation will be published here in this Noozhawk Asks section. Once or twice a month, we plan to do a review of what was asked and answered.

Thanks for asking!

Click Here to Get Started >

Reader Comments

Noozhawk is no longer accepting reader comments on our articles. Click here for the announcement. Readers are instead invited to submit letters to the editor by emailing them to [email protected]. Please provide your full name and community, as well as contact information for verification purposes only.