Pixel Tracker

Tuesday, January 22 , 2019, 3:58 pm | Fair 62º


Mark Shields: Jim Webb May Be Presidential Long-Shot, But He Was Right About War

In September 2002, before the Bush administration got its green light from a supine Congress and a full six months before the United States would actually invade Iraq, he wrote in The Washington Post, confronting directly the “neoconservatives that began beating the war drums on Iraq before the dust had even settled on the World Trade Center” and wisely warning that “the issue before us is not simply whether the United States should end the regime of Saddam Hussein, but whether we as a nation are prepared to physically occupy territory in the Middle East for the next 30 to 50 years.”

The former Marine — who in Vietnam combat earned the Navy Cross, a Silver Star, two Bronze Stars and two Purple Hearts and to this day carries shrapnel in one kidney and at the base of his skull — warned his readers: “In Japan, American occupation forces quickly became 50,000 friends. In Iraq, they would quickly become 50,000 terrorist targets.”

That is what Jim Webb — who had been, under President Ronald Reagan, the first Naval Academy graduate to serve as secretary of the Navy and who would win election, as an anti-war Democrat, to the U.S. Senate from Virginia and along the way author 10 books — prophetically wrote more than 12 years ago.

Two decades earlier, as a journalist for PBS’ MacNeil/Lehrer NewsHour, he had won an Emmy for his October 1983 coverage of a Marine platoon in Lebanon. The platoon’s mission was unclear, but it was clearly dangerous. (This was just one month before the Beirut barracks bombing by terrorists, which killed 220 Marines.) This is how Webb closed his report: “These men are trusting their very lives to the wisdom of our leaders. Our government’s obligation to them, which was too frequently betrayed in Vietnam, is to proceed with a clarity of purpose that matches their own trust and commitment.”

Webb once recalled being in Lebanon with “a Marine outpost where the platoon was taking fire from a Druze outpost because there was a Lebanese army position co-located with the Marines.” He continued: “And then some unknown militia started joining in just because it was Beirut. Then the Syrians came up over one ridge and were firing 25 millimeters down into it. And a young Marine turned around to me and said, ‘Sir, never get involved in a five-sided argument.’” Webb added: “a five-sided argument that has been going on for 2,000 years.” What that young Marine said in 1983 is as true today as it was then.

Webb is thinking about another fight with long odds, seeking the 2016 Democratic presidential nomination. He has none of Hillary Clinton’s enormous strengths — sky-high poll numbers, important endorsements, deep financial support and a history-making gender story.

Webb is anything but a natural candidate. He can inspire loyalty and admiration but little excitement. He is not good at the grip-and-grin or the personal chitchat of working a room full of strangers. Webb is an economic populist who has taken on Wall Street and has been lousy at raising money. To call him a dark horse may be an overstatement.

But make no mistake about it: On the central foreign policy and national security decisions our country has confronted over the past 31 years, nobody in public life — nobody — has been so thoughtful, so fearless or so right as Jim Webb. And if, by the fall of 2015, the Middle East has, sadly, turned into another costly, deadly and divisive quagmire for the United States, would some Democrats in Iowa be ready to support a genuine combat hero who has had the wisdom and the guts to oppose war?

Mark Shields is one of the most widely recognized political commentators in the United States. The former Washington Post editorial columnist appears regularly on CNN, on public television and on radio. Click here to contact him, or click here to read previous columns. The opinions expressed are his own.

Support Noozhawk Today

You are an important ally in our mission to deliver clear, objective, high-quality professional news reporting for Santa Barbara, Goleta and the rest of Santa Barbara County. Join the Hawks Club today to help keep Noozhawk soaring.

We offer four membership levels: $5 a month, $10 a month, $25 a month or $1 a week. Payments can be made using a credit card, Apple Pay or Google Pay, or click here for information on recurring credit-card payments and a mailing address for checks.

Thank you for your vital support.

Become a Noozhawk Supporter

First name
Last name
Select your monthly membership
Or choose an annual membership

Payment Information

Membership Subscription

You are enrolling in . Thank you for joining the Hawks Club.

Payment Method

Pay by Credit Card:

Mastercard, Visa, American Express, Discover
One click only, please!

Pay with Apple Pay or Google Pay:

Noozhawk partners with Stripe to provide secure invoicing and payments processing.
You may cancel your membership at any time by sending an email to .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address).

  • Ask
  • Vote
  • Investigate
  • Answer

Noozhawk Asks: What’s Your Question?

Welcome to Noozhawk Asks, a new feature in which you ask the questions, you help decide what Noozhawk investigates, and you work with us to find the answers.

Here’s how it works: You share your questions with us in the nearby box. In some cases, we may work with you to find the answers. In others, we may ask you to vote on your top choices to help us narrow the scope. And we’ll be regularly asking you for your feedback on a specific issue or topic.

We also expect to work together with the reader who asked the winning questions to find the answer together. Noozhawk’s objective is to come at questions from a place of curiosity and openness, and we believe a transparent collaboration is the key to achieve it.

The results of our investigation will be published here in this Noozhawk Asks section. Once or twice a month, we plan to do a review of what was asked and answered.

Thanks for asking!

Click Here to Get Started >

Reader Comments

Noozhawk is no longer accepting reader comments on our articles. Click here for the announcement. Readers are instead invited to submit letters to the editor by emailing them to [email protected]. Please provide your full name and community, as well as contact information for verification purposes only.