Pixel Tracker

Sunday, January 20 , 2019, 8:51 pm | A Few Clouds 58º


Mark Shields: Mario Cuomo Was a Genuine Heavyweight in U.S. Politics

(CNN video)

There is a shorthand people around politics use when measuring potential presidents: Is this candidate really a “heavyweight” — meaning an individual of seriousness, intelligence and gravity — or is he, heaven forfend, a “lightweight” so unreflective and superficial that he could tap-dance on a soufflé? By every measurable standard, Mario Cuomo, the former three-time governor of New York who died on New Year’s Day at 82, was a genuine heavyweight.

The late Jack Germond, one of the nation’s great political reporters, told a revealing incident from 1977, when Cuomo was running, unsuccessfully, for mayor of New York. Cuomo was holding a news conference on changes needed to reform the abuses in ambulance services in the city. After handing out a fact sheet on the subject, Cuomo answered questions from reporters for 20 minutes before the TV crews began packing up to leave and the reporters put away their notebooks.

But as Germond wrote, “one young radio reporter, a student from Columbia, asked if she could pose a few more questions. Cuomo agreed and then realized from the questions that this young woman had studied the ambulance service problem and probably knew more about it than he did.” What did Cuomo do? He sat there for 45 minutes answering questions, all the time learning. No sound bites on the evening news, just an intellectually curious and honest public man willing to go way beyond talking points. A heavyweight.

Oliver Wendell Holmes once said of another New York governor, Franklin D. Roosevelt, who would become America’s greatest 20th-century president, that he possessed “a second-rate intellect but a first-rate temperament.”

Mario Cuomo — the son of parents who were both Italian immigrants — who did not himself learn to speak English until he began public school in Queens and who would become for an entire generation of Democrats their party’s poetic, public voice, possessed a first-rate intellect.

In the three presidential elections of the 1980s, when losing Democratic nominees carried a total of just 17 states, Cuomo reminded Democrats and Americans of what in fact they had stood successfully for.

Who could forget that eloquence? His fundamental premise about what a proper government should be: “the idea of family, mutuality, the sharing of benefits and burdens for the good of all, feeling one another’s pain, sharing one another’s blessings.”

That was in the speech that made him famous, his keynote to the 1984 Democratic National Convention in San Francisco, in which he taught that “while survival of the fittest may be a good working description of the process of evolution, a government of humans should elevate itself to a higher order” and that “we would rather have laws written by the patron of this great city, the man called ‘the world’s most sincere Democrat’ — St. Francis of Assisi — than laws written by Darwin.”

In an era of chronic Democratic self-doubt, Cuomo remained the principled liberal who dared — when public opinion endorsed capital punishment by a 2-to-1 ratio — to veto seven times bills to reimpose the death penalty.

Unlike his predecessors in Albany — including Nelson Rockefeller, FDR, Averell Harriman, Al Smith and Thomas E. Dewey — Cuomo chose, when he was the clear front-runner for the Democratic nomination, not to seek the presidency.

Vicious, baseless rumors that this proud Italian-American might have some damaging “connection” were contradicted by the vast sums spent by Republicans in negative research against him, which never came up with anything. It was garbage. The question we should ask is not why someone does not run but rather why somebody does run.

Because he was a genuine heavyweight, candidate Mario Cuomo would have commanded the nation’s attention and, perhaps, changed the nation’s direction. But he should be remembered as a serious and significant leader who reminded us well and passionately of what we all owe to one another and to our country.

Mark Shields is one of the most widely recognized political commentators in the United States. The former Washington Post editorial columnist appears regularly on CNN, on public television and on radio. Click here to contact him, or click here to read previous columns. The opinions expressed are his own.

Support Noozhawk Today

You are an important ally in our mission to deliver clear, objective, high-quality professional news reporting for Santa Barbara, Goleta and the rest of Santa Barbara County. Join the Hawks Club today to help keep Noozhawk soaring.

We offer four membership levels: $5 a month, $10 a month, $25 a month or $1 a week. Payments can be made using a credit card, Apple Pay or Google Pay, or click here for information on recurring credit-card payments and a mailing address for checks.

Thank you for your vital support.

Become a Noozhawk Supporter

First name
Last name
Select your monthly membership
Or choose an annual membership

Payment Information

Membership Subscription

You are enrolling in . Thank you for joining the Hawks Club.

Payment Method

Pay by Credit Card:

Mastercard, Visa, American Express, Discover
One click only, please!

Pay with Apple Pay or Google Pay:

Noozhawk partners with Stripe to provide secure invoicing and payments processing.
You may cancel your membership at any time by sending an email to .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address).

  • Ask
  • Vote
  • Investigate
  • Answer

Noozhawk Asks: What’s Your Question?

Welcome to Noozhawk Asks, a new feature in which you ask the questions, you help decide what Noozhawk investigates, and you work with us to find the answers.

Here’s how it works: You share your questions with us in the nearby box. In some cases, we may work with you to find the answers. In others, we may ask you to vote on your top choices to help us narrow the scope. And we’ll be regularly asking you for your feedback on a specific issue or topic.

We also expect to work together with the reader who asked the winning questions to find the answer together. Noozhawk’s objective is to come at questions from a place of curiosity and openness, and we believe a transparent collaboration is the key to achieve it.

The results of our investigation will be published here in this Noozhawk Asks section. Once or twice a month, we plan to do a review of what was asked and answered.

Thanks for asking!

Click Here to Get Started >

Reader Comments

Noozhawk is no longer accepting reader comments on our articles. Click here for the announcement. Readers are instead invited to submit letters to the editor by emailing them to [email protected]. Please provide your full name and community, as well as contact information for verification purposes only.