Friday, October 20 , 2017, 11:44 am | Fair 73º

 
 
 
 

Mark Shields: Missing Kate O’Beirne, and Her Example of Fighting a Good Fight

My adopted hometown of Washington has been accused, not always unfairly, of being a city full of scheming climbers who are frantically courting the company and the favor of the powerful.

In this and so many respects, Kate O’Beirne — the conservative leader and writer who died too soon, at 67 on April 23 — was anti-Washington. O’Beirne was not about making contacts (although the powerful, especially Republicans, regularly sought her approval). She was always about making — and about keeping — friends.

To watch her at some Washington reception was to see a blond, stylish 6-footer seeking out and introducing herself to the nervous newcomer back in the crowd, whom O’Beirne would then deliberately make feel welcome, comfortable and interesting. O’Beirne never had to have the spotlight; she was the spotlight.

For 10 good years, O’Beirne and I — along with the late Robert Novak, Margaret Carlson and Al Hunt — were mostly friendly sparring partners every Saturday night on CNN’s Capital Gang.

O’Beirne and I were both Irish Catholics — she from New York, I from Massachusetts. My family was committed to JFK, and I later worked for Sen. Robert F. Kennedy, D-N.Y. O’Beirne’s dad was a charter subscriber to William F. Buckley’s National Review, and she worked for James L. Buckley (Bill’s brother and a most admirable man), who was elected, as the nominee of the Conservative Party of New York State, to fill the Senate seat previously won by the assassinated RFK.

In short, O’Beirne and I came, politically, from very different places.

Many have written, accurately, about what a generous and encouraging mentor O’Beirne was to young men and women, about what a devoted wife she was to her husband, Jim, about O’Beirne’s being the proud mother of John and Philip (who enlisted in the Army and fought in Afghanistan) and a proud grandmother, and about O’Beirne’s being a believing and committed Catholic.

She was godmother to converts Judge Robert Bork and Bob Novak. With her irrepressible wit, O’Beirne could kid about how cute Novak, invariably seen in public in three-piece suits, had been in his little white christening gown with matching booties.

But as her colleague and opposite number in debates, I want to speak instead about how I believe that Kate O’Beirne’s passing will diminish Washington and our nation’s public life.

O’Beirne, I can testify from personal exposure, had a truly rare gift for deflating the self-important and for refuting your argument in a single grammatical and clever sentence. But she always rejected the corrosive Washington habit, now so prevalent, of demonizing your adversary.

You hear it hourly: My unworthy opponent is not simply mistaken or wrong; he is obviously narrow-minded, mean-spirited or, even worse, desirous to hurt America.

That was never O’Beirne. She did not personalize any argument. She could cut you down to size yet still leave no wounds. Instead, she left good spirits in her wake.

In 10 years, even after heated disagreements about going to war, I cannot recall ever once leaving our Capital Gang set in anger or bitterness. Kate O’Beirne taught us that we could lock horns and afterward be able to shake hands and laugh.

How desperately our American public life needs her great example today.

Mark Shields is one of the most widely recognized political commentators in the United States. The former Washington Post editorial columnist appears regularly on CNN, on public television and on radio. Click here to contact him, or click here to read previous columns. The opinions expressed are his own.

  • Ask
  • Vote
  • Investigate
  • Answer

Noozhawk Asks: What’s Your Question?

Welcome to Noozhawk Asks, a new feature in which you ask the questions, you help decide what Noozhawk investigates, and you work with us to find the answers.

Here’s how it works: You share your questions with us in the nearby box. In some cases, we may work with you to find the answers. In others, we may ask you to vote on your top choices to help us narrow the scope. And we’ll be regularly asking you for your feedback on a specific issue or topic.

We also expect to work together with the reader who asked the winning questions to find the answer together. Noozhawk’s objective is to come at questions from a place of curiosity and openness, and we believe a transparent collaboration is the key to achieve it.

The results of our investigation will be published here in this Noozhawk Asks section. Once or twice a month, we plan to do a review of what was asked and answered.

Thanks for asking!

Click here to get started >

Support Noozhawk Today

You are an important ally in our mission to deliver clear, objective, high-quality professional news reporting for Santa Barbara, Goleta and the rest of Santa Barbara County. Join the Hawks Club today to help keep Noozhawk soaring.

We offer four membership levels: $5 a month, $10 a month, $25 a month or $1 a week. Payments can be made through PayPal below, or click here for information on recurring credit-card payments.

Thank you for your vital support.



Daily Noozhawk

Subscribe to Noozhawk's A.M. Report, our free e-Bulletin sent out every day at 4:15 a.m. with Noozhawk's top stories, hand-picked by the editors.

Sign Up Now >