Tuesday, February 20 , 2018, 5:24 pm | Fair 56º

 
 
 
 

Mark Shields: Negotiating Peace with Your Enemies, Not Your Friends

Yitzhak Rabin, who fought in combat for his country's creation and went on to command her defense forces, had the ideal credentials as prime minister to negotiate the historic Oslo Accord, which, for the first time, forced both the Israelis and the Palestinians to accept each other's existence.

For his work, Rabin earned the Nobel Peace Prize and the blind hatred of an Israeli religious zealot who, outraged by Rabin's concessions to the Palestinians, assassinated the prime minister. Rabin had eloquently defended his unpopular partner in peacemaking: "You negotiate with your enemies, not with your friends."

What brought these words of the martyred Rabin to mind was the combative U.N. speech of Israel's current prime minister, Benjamin Netanyahu, where he disparaged any possible thawing of U.S. relations, let alone renewed nuclear negotiations, with Iran and rejected the new Iranian president, Hassan Rouhani, as "a wolf in sheep's clothing." Netanyahu, as skeptics are wont to do, went on to quote President Ronald Reagan's famous maxim, "trust, but verify."

The irony of course is that it was Reagan who, by signing with Soviet leader Mikhail Gorbachev, the 1987 Intermediate Range Nuclear Forces Treaty (INF), which mandated a 50 percent cut in each country's intercontinental ballistic missiles, boldly dared to alienate many of his own party's most powerful forces.

Of the day that Reagan and Gorbachev signed the treaty, columnist-commentator George Will, then as now an influential conservative thinker and a personal friend of Ronald and Nancy Reagan, wrote, "Dec. 8 will be remembered as the day the Cold War was lost." (The Berlin Wall would come down just 23 months later.) William F. Buckley's National Review devoted its entire issue to condemning the treaty with a front cover calling it "Reagan's Suicide Pact."

William Safire, a conservative columnist of The New York Times, was equally brutal on the "Gipper." He wrote that the Russians "now understand the way to handle Mr. Reagan: Never murder a man who is committing suicide." Howard Phillips, the chairman of the Conservative Caucus, who, like Reagan, had been in 1978 a leading opponent of the Panama Canal treaty, accused Reagan of "fronting as a useful idiot for Soviet propaganda."

Even Reagan's fiercest critics stipulated the man's comfort in his own skin and in his convictions. Unthreatened by the ridicule of even longtime allies, he brought in the anchors of the then-four leading TV networks and directly challenged his opponents who questioned whether it ever really was either wise or practical to negotiate with people you, for good reasons, did not trusted. Of them, Reagan said: "Those people basically down in their deepest thoughts have accepted that war is inevitable." Sound at all familiar to the current conversation?

An important part of the 2008 voter appeal of then-Sen. Barack Obama, D-Ill., was that he was new and fresh. He had not spent a lifetime in Washington. His political strength was simultaneously his political weakness. He never knew Reagan or any of the people who advised and supported Reagan while he prevailed over the ugly abuse and open distrust of many in his political base. Now as the Obama administration takes the first, tentative steps toward seeking to defuse the dangerous tensions with Iran, Obama would be wise to seek the counsel and company of those who were there when Reagan dared to change history by negotiating nuclear arms reduction with the Gorbachev.

Rabin's wisdom is both timeless and timely: "You negotiate peace with your enemies, not with your friends."

Mark Shields is one of the most widely recognized political commentators in the United States. The former Washington Post editorial columnist appears regularly on CNN, on public television and on radio. Click here to contact him, or click here to read previous columns. The opinions expressed are his own.

  • Ask
  • Vote
  • Investigate
  • Answer

Noozhawk Asks: What’s Your Question?

Welcome to Noozhawk Asks, a new feature in which you ask the questions, you help decide what Noozhawk investigates, and you work with us to find the answers.

Here’s how it works: You share your questions with us in the nearby box. In some cases, we may work with you to find the answers. In others, we may ask you to vote on your top choices to help us narrow the scope. And we’ll be regularly asking you for your feedback on a specific issue or topic.

We also expect to work together with the reader who asked the winning questions to find the answer together. Noozhawk’s objective is to come at questions from a place of curiosity and openness, and we believe a transparent collaboration is the key to achieve it.

The results of our investigation will be published here in this Noozhawk Asks section. Once or twice a month, we plan to do a review of what was asked and answered.

Thanks for asking!

Click here to get started >

Support Noozhawk Today

You are an important ally in our mission to deliver clear, objective, high-quality professional news reporting for Santa Barbara, Goleta and the rest of Santa Barbara County. Join the Hawks Club today to help keep Noozhawk soaring.

We offer four membership levels: $5 a month, $10 a month, $25 a month or $1 a week. Payments can be made through PayPal below, or click here for information on recurring credit-card payments.

Thank you for your vital support.



Reader Comments

Noozhawk is no longer accepting reader comments on our articles. Click here for the announcement. Readers are instead invited to submit letters to the editor by emailing them to [email protected]. Please provide your full name and community, as well as contact information for verification purposes only.

Daily Noozhawk

Subscribe to Noozhawk's A.M. Report, our free e-Bulletin sent out every day at 4:15 a.m. with Noozhawk's top stories, hand-picked by the editors.

Sign Up Now >