Wednesday, August 24 , 2016, 4:26 am | Fair 59º

  • Follow Noozhawk on LinkedIn
  • Follow Noozhawk on Pinterest
  • Follow Noozhawk on YouTube
 
 
 
 

Michael Barone: Britain’s Political Stalemate Resembles America’s

LONDON — British politics has a familiar look to Americans, with a center-right Conservative Party and a center-left Labour Party resembling America's Republicans and Democrats.

Britain's parliamentary system, however, presents a contrast with the U.S. Constitution on the surface. A prime minister whose party has a majority in the House of Commons can pass any law he or she likes, since members of Parliament almost always vote on party lines.

The House of Lords can delay or amend legislation, but can be overridden by a Commons majority. The monarch theoretically has a veto, but it has not been exercised for hundreds of years and is unthinkable today.

Local governments are creatures of Parliament, subject to national law and can even be abolished. Margaret Thatcher snuffed out the left-wing Greater London Council in 1986.

So theoretically, the British live under what has been called a prime ministerial dictatorship. Yet in practice it isn't working that way.

At the moment, British politics seems stalemated in a way not wholly unlike the way American politics is stalemated, with a Democratic president tussling with a Republican House, with different states pursuing different policies, often at odds with the federal government.

The cause, when you get to the bottom of it, is the same: Voters who are unwilling to make crisp and clear choices between two closely competitive national political parties.

Such was the case in the last general election in May 2010. Labour Prime Minister Gordon Brown was ousted, but Conservative leader David Cameron fell just short of a parliamentary majority, with 307 of 650 seats.

So Cameron formed a coalition government with the Liberal Democrats that has proved surprisingly durable but not entirely unfractious.

Achievements include Education Secretary Michael Gove's academics, freeing most United Kingdom schools from union control and seniority assignments, and Iain Duncan Smith's welfare-to-work program eliminating perpetual unemployment benefits.

After long stagnation, the British economy is finally growing again, and two recent polls show Conservatives ahead of Ed Miliband's increasingly leftish Labour party — contrary to the usual British pattern in which the party in power lags behind.

This raises the possibility of a Conservative victory in the election scheduled for May 2015. But the party faces two serious obstacles.

One is that the district boundaries heavily favor Labour. Its old industrial seats are losing population while fast-growing affluent areas lean Conservative. But the Lib Dems refused to approve new boundaries after Conservative backbenchers scuppered their attempt to maintain perpetual leverage by granting more power to the Lords, where no party has a majority.

The other is the emergence of UKIP, the United Kingdom Independence Party, which wants Britain out of the European Union and limits on immigration from poor countries.

Cameron has promised to renegotiate Britain's terms with the EU and to hold a referendum on staying in on the new terms in 2017. But UKIP averages 14 percent in recent polls — votes that might otherwise go Conservative.

Hovering over all this is the referendum on Scottish independence scheduled for Sept. 18. Tony Blair's Labour government granted Scotland its own parliament in 1999, and the current chief minister, Alex Salmond of the Scottish Nationalist Party, favors independence.

Polls show independence trailing. British politicians have made it clear that an independent Scotland cannot keep the pound. European nations facing separatist movements will surely keep Scotland out of the EU and the euro.

But not every poll shows the anti-independence vote over 50 percent. Labourites are nervous; their party wins most Scottish seats in the national parliament. Conservatives are nervous lest they be known as the party that lost Scotland.

The coalition government has achieved — or missed out on — most of its legislative goals and last week sent the House of Commons out of session early. The immediate contests on the political calendar are elections to the European Parliament on May 22.

Few in Britain care much about the European Parliament; turnout in these elections is low and the party in power usually does dismally. Polls are all over the lot, with three parties — Labour, Conservatives, UKIP — in the lead.

As for 2015, Labour leader Miliband's leftist strategy suggests he's going after 35 percent of the vote and hoping the district boundaries will produce victory. But if you plug the numbers from the latest public poll into the electoralcalculus.co.uk website, you find neither major party with a majority.

Sound familiar?

Michael Barone is a senior political analyst for The Washington Examiner, a resident fellow at the American Enterprise Institute, a Fox News Channel contributor and a co-author of The Almanac of American Politics. Click here to contact him, follow him on Twitter: @MichaelBarone, or click here to read previous columns. The opinions expressed are his own.

Reader Comments

Noozhawk's intent is not to limit the discussion of our stories but to elevate it. Comments should be relevant and must be free of profanity and abusive language and attacks.

By posting on Noozhawk, you:

» Agree to be respectful. Noozhawk encourages intelligent and impassioned discussion and debate, but now has a zero-tolerance policy for those who cannot express their opinions in a civil manner.

» Agree not to use Noozhawk’s forums for personal attacks. This includes any sort of personal attack — including, but not limited to, the people in our stories, the journalists who create these stories, fellow readers who comment on our stories, or anyone else in our community.

» Agree not to post on Noozhawk any comments that can be construed as libelous, defamatory, obscene, profane, vulgar, harmful, threatening, tortious, harassing, abusive, hateful, sexist, racially or ethnically objectionable, or that are invasive of another’s privacy.

» Agree not to post in a manner than emulates, purports or pretends to be someone else. Under no circumstances are readers posting to Noozhawk to knowingly use the name or identity of another person, whether that is another reader on this site, a public figure, celebrity, elected official or fictitious character. This also means readers will not knowingly give out any personal information of other members of these forums.

» Agree not to solicit others. You agree you will not use Noozhawk’s forums to solicit and/or advertise for personal blogs and websites, without Noozhawk’s express written approval.

Noozhawk’s management and editors, in our sole discretion, retain the right to remove individual posts or to revoke the access privileges of anyone who we believe has violated any of these terms or any other term of this agreement; however, we are under no obligation to do so.

Support Noozhawk Today

You are an important ally in our mission to deliver clear, objective, high-quality professional news reporting for Santa Barbara, Goleta and the rest of Santa Barbara County. Join the Hawks Club today to help keep Noozhawk soaring.

We offer four membership levels: $5 a month, $10 a month, $25 a month or $1 a week. Payments can be made through PayPal below, or click here for information on recurring credit-card payments.

Thank you for your vital support.



Daily Noozhawk

Subscribe to Noozhawk's A.M. Report, our free e-Bulletin sent out every day at 4:15 a.m. with Noozhawk's top stories, hand-picked by the editors.

Sign Up Now >