Pixel Tracker

Sunday, January 20 , 2019, 12:18 am | Fair 51º


Michael Barone: Hillary Scores Debate Win — According to Dems

Going into the Democrats' first presidential debate Tuesday night, Hillary Clinton seems to have banked on one thing: that far fewer Americans would be watching than watched the Republican debates in August and September.

That assumption proved correct. Nielsen ratings indicate that over 15 million viewers tuned in. That's more than the previous Democratic record of 11 million, but it's not much more than half the 23 and 24 million who watched the Republican debates.

Clinton, in what National Journal's Ron Fournier called "a performance that was as dishonest as it was impressive," clearly spoke persuasively to that heavily Democratic audience. With a timely assist, it should be added, from the one rival with poll numbers high enough to have qualified him for prime time if he were a Republican: Bernie Sanders.

"The American people are sick and tired of hearing about your damn emails," Sanders said. "Me, too! Me, too!" Clinton replied. The highly partisan crowd roared and the two candidates shook hands.

The "damn emails" still trouble all Republicans and most Independents, but Democrats don't like dissent and relished Clinton's repeated attacks on Republicans.

Clinton was careful also not to leave much room between her 2008 vanquisher and 2009–13 boss, Barack Obama. On foreign policy, she noted that "he valued my judgment and I spent a lot of time with him in the Situation Room, going over some very difficult issues."

Not much room left for Joe Biden, reportedly watching the debate from the vice president's house.

On Libya, he "made the right decision at the time." She noted her role in advising Obama on the "tough decision" he had to make about Osama bin Laden — on which Biden gave contrary advice.

On Syria, she applauded the administration for being "engaged in talks right now with the Russians to make it clear that they've got to be part of the solution to try to end that bloody conflict."

In another forum those statements would be subject to challenge. Most voters don't believe the Osama decision was tough. It's hard to argue their handling of the Libya crisis has held up over time. It's pathetic to plead with the Russians, who are bombing our allies and blocking the "no-fly" zone that Clinton backs, to change their course. Overall polls give Obama negative marks on foreign policy.

But almost all Democratic voters have favorable feelings toward both Obama and Clinton.

So Clinton's rivals mostly drew back from attacking her. The rare dissent on policy — notably Jim Webb's succinct statement opposing the Iran nuclear deal — was met with silence from the other candidates, the questioners and the audience. The fact that most voters oppose the deal was ignored.

Focus group participants took a different view of the debate from almost all pundits, who scored it as a victory for Clinton.

Democrats with favorable feelings toward Clinton are indeed flirting with the Sanders candidacy. Left-wing Democrats, like right-wing Republicans, are enchanted by candidates who dare to take stands they perceive as unpopular with voters generally.

But such candidates don't get nominated. Sanders gamely tried to appeal to blacks, who make up 20 to 25 percent of Democratic primary voters, by decrying the nation's high prison populations and calling (as Clinton and many Republicans have) for changes in criminal sentencing.

He, like all except Webb, embraced the "black lives matter" slogan without regard for the actual Black Lives Matter platform.

But that seems unlikely to move black voters away from the first secretary of state for the man hailed as the first black president.

Sanders also risked turning off some Democrats by repeatedly criticizing the United States for lacking welfare state provisions like those in Denmark, Sweden and Norway.

Clinton responded with an eye on the general election as well as the primaries. "But we are not Denmark. I love Denmark. We are the United States of America."

The Democrats' talk about economic inequities might convince a man from Mars that we're in the seventh year of a reactionary Republican presidency. You didn't hear much praise of the signal Obama achievements, Obamacare and the Iran deal.

And candidates' policies to reduce inequality — higher minimum wage, paid family leave — seem pathetically inadequate beside the candidates' dire diagnoses.

The debate left little doubt about who the nominee will be or about her presentational skills when not faced with opposition, but as Bloomberg's Megan McArdle writes, "Democrats wasted their chance to test Clinton."

Michael Barone is a senior political analyst for The Washington Examiner, a resident fellow at the American Enterprise Institute, a Fox News Channel contributor and a co-author of The Almanac of American Politics. Click here to contact him, follow him on Twitter: @MichaelBarone, or click here to read previous columns. The opinions expressed are his own.

Support Noozhawk Today

You are an important ally in our mission to deliver clear, objective, high-quality professional news reporting for Santa Barbara, Goleta and the rest of Santa Barbara County. Join the Hawks Club today to help keep Noozhawk soaring.

We offer four membership levels: $5 a month, $10 a month, $25 a month or $1 a week. Payments can be made using a credit card, Apple Pay or Google Pay, or click here for information on recurring credit-card payments and a mailing address for checks.

Thank you for your vital support.

Become a Noozhawk Supporter

First name
Last name
Select your monthly membership
Or choose an annual membership

Payment Information

Membership Subscription

You are enrolling in . Thank you for joining the Hawks Club.

Payment Method

Pay by Credit Card:

Mastercard, Visa, American Express, Discover
One click only, please!

Pay with Apple Pay or Google Pay:

Noozhawk partners with Stripe to provide secure invoicing and payments processing.
You may cancel your membership at any time by sending an email to .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address).

  • Ask
  • Vote
  • Investigate
  • Answer

Noozhawk Asks: What’s Your Question?

Welcome to Noozhawk Asks, a new feature in which you ask the questions, you help decide what Noozhawk investigates, and you work with us to find the answers.

Here’s how it works: You share your questions with us in the nearby box. In some cases, we may work with you to find the answers. In others, we may ask you to vote on your top choices to help us narrow the scope. And we’ll be regularly asking you for your feedback on a specific issue or topic.

We also expect to work together with the reader who asked the winning questions to find the answer together. Noozhawk’s objective is to come at questions from a place of curiosity and openness, and we believe a transparent collaboration is the key to achieve it.

The results of our investigation will be published here in this Noozhawk Asks section. Once or twice a month, we plan to do a review of what was asked and answered.

Thanks for asking!

Click Here to Get Started >

Reader Comments

Noozhawk is no longer accepting reader comments on our articles. Click here for the announcement. Readers are instead invited to submit letters to the editor by emailing them to [email protected]. Please provide your full name and community, as well as contact information for verification purposes only.

Daily Noozhawk

Subscribe to Noozhawk's A.M. Report, our free e-Bulletin sent out every day at 4:15 a.m. with Noozhawk's top stories, hand-picked by the editors.

Sign Up Now >