Wednesday, June 20 , 2018, 11:27 pm | Fair 63º

 
 
 
 

Mona Charen: Zimmerman Verdict and Racial Incitement in the Internet Age

The day after the George Zimmerman verdict was announced, I was at the supermarket. As always, Americans of all races went about their business. An elderly Asian lady got help from a tall Caucasian kid reaching an item on an upper shelf. A black cashier shared a joke with a white customer. A manager who might be Hispanic helped a patron of indeterminate ethnicity with a return. All was calm and composed. Let’s call that supermarket America.

There’s another America that exists on the TV, radio and the cell phone screen. There the race baiters, provocateurs, rumormongers and ratings-mad self-promoters hold court. It’s the dark underside of the nation. Let’s call it Id America.

Those little computers we all carry in our pockets are in some respects the wonder of the age, but there’s a dark underside to the wired era. In addition to the profusion and normalization of pornography, the Internet has also served as a vehicle for political pornography.

When an emotional story like the Trayvon Martin/Zimmerman tragedy presents itself for exploitation, the complexities and nuances are buried in an avalanche of deliberate racial incitement. The Internet serves more to inflame than to inform. Rumor is in the saddle and it rides America.

According to Snopes.com, one widely credited story that made the rounds suggested that Zimmerman’s legal bills were being paid by Koch Industries. A much-forwarded email read in part, “The company ... is paying for Zimmerman’s legal fees because they feel he had legal right to bear arms and shoot Trayvon. ... We are asking that ... people not buy any of the following items ... Angel Soft toilet paper, Brawny paper towels, Mardi Gras napkins and towels, Quilted Northern toilet paper, Soft ‘n’ gentile [sic] toilet paper.”

Whatever the merits of avoiding “gentile” toilet paper, which probably isn’t kosher under any circumstances, the rumor was false. Koch had nothing to do with Zimmerman’s defense.

But the tone of the email, the assertion that a conservative company believes Zimmerman had the “right” to shoot Martin, was consistent with much of the commentary to be found on MSNBC, CNN and dozens of websites throughout this episode.

It was wall-to-wall incitement. NBC may be facing a defamation suit for selectively editing a 9-1-1 tape to imply that Zimmerman was racially profiling Martin. An MSNBC host called Zimmerman a “murderer.” Commentators like Tavis Smiley summed up the case: “Trayvon Martin was a child who was racially profiled and gunned down.”

On the other side, a photo purporting to be a more recent shot of Martin made the rounds. It showed a muscular 6-foot-2-inch black youth lifting his middle fingers to the camera. But it wasn’t Martin.

Smiley insists that “race will get you killed in America.” Advocates for a guilty verdict sport T-shirts saying “Enough in Enough.” In the alternate universe that the commentators and hustlers like Al Sharpton invent, America is in the grip of an epidemic of violent crimes committed against young black men by white people. That just isn’t true. According to the FBI, most blacks are killed by other blacks. The same goes for whites. Blacks are less likely to be killed by whites than whites are to be killed by blacks, but, for the most part, murderers kill fellow members of their melanin class.

In supermarket America, no one wants to see anyone’s innocent child killed. Among normal Americans there is a common sense understanding that, based on what we know, it looks like both Martin and Zimmerman (both of whom have had brushes with the law in their pasts) showed poor judgment. That a jury could not say that Zimmerman, his face and head bloodied, acted “beyond a reasonable doubt” in a “depraved” state of “ill will, hatred or spite” was an understatement. There was abundant evidence that he was defending himself in the course of a fight. Was he too rash? It’s possible, but that wasn’t for the jury to say. They were asked only whether his conduct could not by any stretch be considered self-defense.

It’s a terrible tragedy that Martin’s life was cut short. It’s also a tragedy that our race-baiting provocateurs never tire of waving the bloody shirt in hopes of stirring even more interracial violence and bitterness.

Mona Charen is a columnist with National Review magazine. Click here to contact her, follow her on Twitter: @mcharen, or click here to read previous columns. The opinions expressed are her own.

Support Noozhawk Today

You are an important ally in our mission to deliver clear, objective, high-quality professional news reporting for Santa Barbara, Goleta and the rest of Santa Barbara County. Join the Hawks Club today to help keep Noozhawk soaring.

We offer four membership levels: $5 a month, $10 a month, $25 a month or $1 a week. Payments can be made through PayPal below, or click here for information on recurring credit-card payments.

Thank you for your vital support.

Become a Noozhawk Supporter

First name
Last name
Enter your email
Select your membership level
×

Payment Information

You are purchasing:

Payment Method

Pay by Credit Card:

Mastercard, Visa, American Express, Discover

Pay with Apple Pay or Google Pay:

Noozhawk partners with Stripe to provide secure invoicing and payments processing.

  • Ask
  • Vote
  • Investigate
  • Answer

Noozhawk Asks: What’s Your Question?

Welcome to Noozhawk Asks, a new feature in which you ask the questions, you help decide what Noozhawk investigates, and you work with us to find the answers.

Here’s how it works: You share your questions with us in the nearby box. In some cases, we may work with you to find the answers. In others, we may ask you to vote on your top choices to help us narrow the scope. And we’ll be regularly asking you for your feedback on a specific issue or topic.

We also expect to work together with the reader who asked the winning questions to find the answer together. Noozhawk’s objective is to come at questions from a place of curiosity and openness, and we believe a transparent collaboration is the key to achieve it.

The results of our investigation will be published here in this Noozhawk Asks section. Once or twice a month, we plan to do a review of what was asked and answered.

Thanks for asking!

Click Here to Get Started >

Reader Comments

Noozhawk is no longer accepting reader comments on our articles. Click here for the announcement. Readers are instead invited to submit letters to the editor by emailing them to [email protected]. Please provide your full name and community, as well as contact information for verification purposes only.

Daily Noozhawk

Subscribe to Noozhawk's A.M. Report, our free e-Bulletin sent out every day at 4:15 a.m. with Noozhawk's top stories, hand-picked by the editors.

Sign Up Now >