Pixel Tracker

Saturday, February 16 , 2019, 5:57 pm | A Few Clouds 57º

 
 
 
 
Advice

Montecito Planning Commission Supports Banning Short-Term Vacation Rentals

Montecito planning officials favored an all-out ban on short-term vacation rentals in residential zones during a discussion Wednesday, citing an all-or-nothing approach as easier to enforce than taking a middle ground.

The Montecito Planning Commission took its first look at the growing practice of renting a room or home for fewer than 30 consecutive days. The group’s input will be passed on to the Santa Barbara County Board of Supervisors for the final say in spring 2016.

Officials were specifically tasked with determining if the 120 rentals currently paying transient occupancy taxes to the county should cease operating what constitutes a business in noncommercial zones on the coast and inland.

“When you do overlay, then where does it stop?” Chair J’Amy Brown said of Commissioner Jack Overall’s initial hope that Miramar Beach rentals could continue operating as they have for many years.

“I think it’s still wiser to be black or white.”

The Montecito Planning Commission unanimously voted to back zoning ordinance language to ban short-term rentals, something that will be discussed again in early 2016.

Right now, the term “short-term vacation rental” doesn’t exist in county books, but the county collected nearly $1.4 million in TOT from more than 400 rentals in unincorporated areas during the 2014-15 fiscal year, according to County Treasurer-Tax Collector records.

Montecito planners presented a more united front against the rentals as “changing the fabric” of neighborhoods and taking affordable housing away from locals who need it.

Earlier this month, the County Planning Commission continued the item until Dec. 9 so staff could gather more information related to enforcement and whether certain neighborhoods, such as Miramar Beach, could be exempt.

Montecito commissioners took their time asking each public speaker questions about where they lived, how often they rent properties, what types of guests they allow and how long they typically stay.

Overall worried about revoking the rights to rent out properties on a short-term basis, especially for people near the coast who bought homes for the extra rental income.

“I would be really upset,” he said.

The Montecito Association came out in favor of the all-out ban, but the Santa Barbara Association of Realtors asked for a more careful approach.

Reyne Stapelmann, the association president, suggested commissioners adopt an ordinance similar to the city of Goleta, where short-term rental owners apply for business licenses, pay TOT and provide the city with nuisance response plans and contact information.

Commissioners couldn’t narrow down how many complaints have been made about rentals— authorities don’t parcel out those calls — and said they did sympathize with folks who needed the rental income.

Maybe if there’s proof of financial hardship, Overall said, an exemption could be made.

Commissioners ultimately decided not to differentiate between short-term rentals and home stays, which refer to renting out a portion of a home with the owner present during the stay.

“There’s just too much impact,” Brown said.

Noozhawk staff writer Gina Potthoff can be reached at .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address). Follow Noozhawk on Twitter: @noozhawk, @NoozhawkNews and @NoozhawkBiz. Connect with Noozhawk on Facebook.

Talk to Us!

Please take Noozhawk's audience survey to help us understand what you expect — and want — from us. It'll take you just a few minutes. Thank you!

Get Started >

Support Noozhawk Today

You are an important ally in our mission to deliver clear, objective, high-quality professional news reporting for Santa Barbara, Goleta and the rest of Santa Barbara County. Join the Hawks Club today to help keep Noozhawk soaring.

We offer four membership levels: $5 a month, $10 a month, $25 a month or $1 a week. Payments can be made using a credit card, Apple Pay or Google Pay, or click here for information on recurring credit-card payments and a mailing address for checks.

Thank you for your vital support.

Become a Noozhawk Supporter

First name
Last name
Email
Select your monthly membership
Or choose an annual membership
×

Payment Information

Membership Subscription

You are enrolling in . Thank you for joining the Hawks Club.

Payment Method

Pay by Credit Card:

Mastercard, Visa, American Express, Discover
One click only, please!

Pay with Apple Pay or Google Pay:

Noozhawk partners with Stripe to provide secure invoicing and payments processing.
You may cancel your membership at any time by sending an email to .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address).

  • Ask
  • Vote
  • Investigate
  • Answer

Noozhawk Asks: What’s Your Question?

Welcome to Noozhawk Asks, a new feature in which you ask the questions, you help decide what Noozhawk investigates, and you work with us to find the answers.

Here’s how it works: You share your questions with us in the nearby box. In some cases, we may work with you to find the answers. In others, we may ask you to vote on your top choices to help us narrow the scope. And we’ll be regularly asking you for your feedback on a specific issue or topic.

We also expect to work together with the reader who asked the winning questions to find the answer together. Noozhawk’s objective is to come at questions from a place of curiosity and openness, and we believe a transparent collaboration is the key to achieve it.

The results of our investigation will be published here in this Noozhawk Asks section. Once or twice a month, we plan to do a review of what was asked and answered.

Thanks for asking!

Click Here to Get Started >

Reader Comments

Noozhawk is no longer accepting reader comments on our articles. Click here for the announcement. Readers are instead invited to submit letters to the editor by emailing them to [email protected]. Please provide your full name and community, as well as contact information for verification purposes only.