Monday, October 22 , 2018, 6:14 am | Overcast 62º


Parents Sue Santa Barbara County, State Health Officials Over New Vaccination Law

A group of parents filed a lawsuit against Santa Barbara County Public Health officials, and the state education and health departments over a new state law barring personal-belief exemptions for vaccinating children.

Filed in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of California in San Diego, 17 parents and four nonprofit organizations representing parents who say they were impacted by SB 277 are suing Santa Barbara County Public Health director Dr. Takashi Wada, Public Health officer Dr. Charity Dean, the state Department of Education, its superintendent Tom Torlakson, the state Board of Education, the state Department of Public Health and its director Dr. Karen Smith.

The plaintiff organizations, which claim in the lawsuit to have thousands of California members, are the E4A Foundation, Weston A. Price Foundation, Citizens for Health and the Alliance for Natural Health.

Two of the plaintiff parents, Melanie Sunukjian and Douglas Mackenzie, have schoolchildren in Santa Barbara, one of whom with the Santa Barbara Unified School District.

In January, the SBUSD sent out a letter to parents who have a waiver on file or with kids entering kindergarten, transitional kindergarten and seventh grade informing them of SB 277, district spokeswoman Barbara Keyani told Noozhawk.

Following a 2014 measles outbreak that started at Disneyland, state legislators passed and Gov. Jerry Brown signed into law SB 277, which mandates that all children receive the required vaccines before starting kindergarten or advancing to seventh grade.

Though valid medical exemptions are allowed, personal-belief and religious-belief exemptions are no longer permitted.

“As a result of the enactment of Senate Bill 277, the State of California denies tens of thousands of children access to its schools and day cares and relegates them to the separate-and-unequal position of learning in isolation, in permanent quarantine,” the plaintiffs claim in the lawsuit.

“Parents have the right to direct the upbringing of their children in accordance with their deeply-held convictions and their religious beliefs,” the plaintiffs wrote.

County Public Health Department spokeswoman Susan Klein-Rothschild said the department has been doing its best to implement a law that was “passed to protect children’s health,” but was unable to comment further on the ongoing lawsuit.

“Vaccines have been one of the best ways to protect children from disease,” she said.

Signed into law in June 2015, SB 277 went into effect July 1, making California the third state behind West Virginia and Mississippi to prohibit personal-belief exemptions.

The lawsuit was filed two weeks later.

“The science is clear that vaccines dramatically protect children against a number of infectious and dangerous diseases,” Brown wrote after signing the bill.

“While it's true that no medical intervention is without risk, the evidence shows that immunization powerfully benefits and protects the community.”

According to a study done by the California Department of Public Health, 92.9 percent of children in the state received all their required vaccines for the 2015-16 school year, up 2.5 percent from 2014.

The parents of 2.4 percent of children entering kindergarten had personal-belief exemptions, the study found.

Shots for School, a website that collects data on school vaccination and personal-belief exemption rates, recorded 13 child-care schools and preschools in the Santa Barbara and Goleta area that are categorized as most vulnerable due to relatively low vaccine rates among its children, which the site defined as below 80 percent having been fully vaccinated.

Based on their data, another 15 child-care schools and preschools were considered safest, where the fully-vaccinated rate was 95 percent or higher.

Sixteen kindergarten schools in the South Coast area were labeled safest, while five were listed as most vulnerable.

Eleven of the 15 seventh-grade schools in that same area, Shots for School’s data found, were considered safest.

The plaintiffs are asking the court to find SB 277 unconstitutional, in regard to both state and federal laws, and to place an injunction against the law’s enforcement.

Among other claims, the lawsuit alleges that Wada, Dean, and the other defendants are singling out the plaintiffs' children for unequal treatment and depriving the parents of the rights to free exercise of religion, to control their children’s upbringing and, for their children, to education.

Noozhawk staff writer Sam Goldman can be reached at .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address). Follow Noozhawk on Twitter: @noozhawk, @NoozhawkNews and @NoozhawkBiz. Connect with Noozhawk on Facebook.

Support Noozhawk Today

You are an important ally in our mission to deliver clear, objective, high-quality professional news reporting for Santa Barbara, Goleta and the rest of Santa Barbara County. Join the Hawks Club today to help keep Noozhawk soaring.

We offer four membership levels: $5 a month, $10 a month, $25 a month or $1 a week. Payments can be made using a credit card, Apple Pay or Google Pay, or click here for information on recurring credit-card payments and a mailing address for checks.

Thank you for your vital support.

Become a Noozhawk Supporter

First name
Last name
Select your monthly membership
Or choose an annual membership

Payment Information

Membership Subscription

You are enrolling in . Thank you for joining the Hawks Club.

Payment Method

Pay by Credit Card:

Mastercard, Visa, American Express, Discover
One click only, please!

Pay with Apple Pay or Google Pay:

Noozhawk partners with Stripe to provide secure invoicing and payments processing.
You may cancel your membership at any time by sending an email to .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address).

  • Ask
  • Vote
  • Investigate
  • Answer

Noozhawk Asks: What’s Your Question?

Welcome to Noozhawk Asks, a new feature in which you ask the questions, you help decide what Noozhawk investigates, and you work with us to find the answers.

Here’s how it works: You share your questions with us in the nearby box. In some cases, we may work with you to find the answers. In others, we may ask you to vote on your top choices to help us narrow the scope. And we’ll be regularly asking you for your feedback on a specific issue or topic.

We also expect to work together with the reader who asked the winning questions to find the answer together. Noozhawk’s objective is to come at questions from a place of curiosity and openness, and we believe a transparent collaboration is the key to achieve it.

The results of our investigation will be published here in this Noozhawk Asks section. Once or twice a month, we plan to do a review of what was asked and answered.

Thanks for asking!

Click Here to Get Started >

Reader Comments

Noozhawk is no longer accepting reader comments on our articles. Click here for the announcement. Readers are instead invited to submit letters to the editor by emailing them to [email protected]. Please provide your full name and community, as well as contact information for verification purposes only.