Pixel Tracker

Sunday, January 20 , 2019, 4:25 am | Fair 47º


Peter Funt: Media Struggle When Donald Trump Actually Makes News

The Trump administration’s efforts to make policy and govern while also dealing with its own internal West Wing drama has news media careening, almost daily, down two separate tracks.

Such distractions have burdened all presidencies, but rarely for so long and with such intensity as has been the case since President Donald Trump’s first day in office. A vivid example occurred last week, providing a test of media judgment as well as Trump’s ability to manage his message.

Early in the day on Feb. 28, Trump met with leaders of Congress and stunned many in the room and those watching on TV by stating support for gun control measures long opposed by many Republicans and the National Rifle Association.

In the afternoon, that news seemed to be eclipsed — depending, perhaps, on what sort of glasses you wore to view the eclipse — by the resignation of Hope Hicks, the White House communications director and a key Trump confidant.

How would these stories be covered? Of particular interest were the broadcast networks’ three main evening newscasts, which collectively still reach more Americans than any other news distribution, whether in print, on cable or online. ABC, CBS and NBC all began their broadcasts with the Hicks story.

My view of so-called mainstream media, having worked in it and watched it, is that there is no significant bias when it comes to hard news.

The three legacy broadcast networks in particular strain to be — and, even more important in their view, strain to be perceived as — objective. Yet, the pressures of their industry and competition from new media make that increasingly difficult.

Flies on the walls of the three networks’ newsrooms might have heard this that evening:

» The Hicks story broke late in the day and is fresh.

» Trump has floated similarly striking positions on such things as immigration before and then later backpedaled.

» Just hours earlier, Hicks conceded to telling “white lies” to protect Trump, which could hint at bigger problems for him regarding the Robert Mueller investigation.

» The NRA and its supporters in Congress have always managed to beat back serious efforts at gun control, making Trump’s pronouncements much ado about little.

So, Lester Holt began his NBC newscast by declaring Hicks’ resignation a “bombshell.” On CBS, the graphic read “Hope Gone.” ABC’s David Muir also began with the news about Hicks, failing to report the critical caveat that her “white lies” comment to House investigators was apparently not related to any element of the Russia investigation.

Both stories are big, but I believe the three networks got it wrong. The following morning, The Wall Street Journal, The New York Times and most other papers, including New York’s brash tabloids, gave Trump’s comments about guns their top positions. The Times, which actually broke the Hicks story, ran its report about her on page 17.

White House staffers, most notably Kellyanne Conway, have complained repeatedly that media give too much attention to West Wing drama while under-reporting the administration’s accomplishments.

But, for the most part, the White House has gotten in the way of its own message — with poor timing, wholesale leaks, and relentless, often confusing, tweets from the boss.

In this case, what if the networks are right, and Trump fails to make good on his promises about gun regulations? Well, that would be a big story in itself, and all the more reason why networks should have signaled viewers that what he said about guns was the biggest news of the day.

Remember, that day’s gun news also included announcements by Dick’s Sporting Goods and Walmart that they would not sell guns to persons under age 21, with Dick’s discontinuing its sale of “assault” weapons and high-capacity magazines. That added heft to Trump’s remarks, making them more newsworthy.

As for managing its message, the White House confounded many observers by allowing news of Hicks’ departure to spill out at a time when it was likely to overshadow, or at least compete with, the important declarations about guns.

The nature of the Trump White House will force journalists, for the foreseeable future, to travel down two tracks. But broadcast media look bad on days when news judgment gets derailed.

Peter Funt is a writer, speaker and author of the book, Cautiously Optimistic. He is syndicated by Cagle Cartoons and can be contacted at www.candidcamera.com. Click here for previous columns. The opinions expressed are his own.

Support Noozhawk Today

You are an important ally in our mission to deliver clear, objective, high-quality professional news reporting for Santa Barbara, Goleta and the rest of Santa Barbara County. Join the Hawks Club today to help keep Noozhawk soaring.

We offer four membership levels: $5 a month, $10 a month, $25 a month or $1 a week. Payments can be made using a credit card, Apple Pay or Google Pay, or click here for information on recurring credit-card payments and a mailing address for checks.

Thank you for your vital support.

Become a Noozhawk Supporter

First name
Last name
Select your monthly membership
Or choose an annual membership

Payment Information

Membership Subscription

You are enrolling in . Thank you for joining the Hawks Club.

Payment Method

Pay by Credit Card:

Mastercard, Visa, American Express, Discover
One click only, please!

Pay with Apple Pay or Google Pay:

Noozhawk partners with Stripe to provide secure invoicing and payments processing.
You may cancel your membership at any time by sending an email to .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address).

  • Ask
  • Vote
  • Investigate
  • Answer

Noozhawk Asks: What’s Your Question?

Welcome to Noozhawk Asks, a new feature in which you ask the questions, you help decide what Noozhawk investigates, and you work with us to find the answers.

Here’s how it works: You share your questions with us in the nearby box. In some cases, we may work with you to find the answers. In others, we may ask you to vote on your top choices to help us narrow the scope. And we’ll be regularly asking you for your feedback on a specific issue or topic.

We also expect to work together with the reader who asked the winning questions to find the answer together. Noozhawk’s objective is to come at questions from a place of curiosity and openness, and we believe a transparent collaboration is the key to achieve it.

The results of our investigation will be published here in this Noozhawk Asks section. Once or twice a month, we plan to do a review of what was asked and answered.

Thanks for asking!

Click Here to Get Started >

Reader Comments

Noozhawk is no longer accepting reader comments on our articles. Click here for the announcement. Readers are instead invited to submit letters to the editor by emailing them to [email protected]. Please provide your full name and community, as well as contact information for verification purposes only.