Pixel Tracker

Monday, March 25 , 2019, 1:22 pm | Fair 62º


Pet Shops in SLO County, Santa Maria Running ‘Puppy Laundering Operation,’ Lawsuit Says

Three Animal Kingdom Pet Store locations are named in the court filing

Pismo Beach pet store
Animal Kingdom Pet Store locations, including this one in Pismo Beach, are accused in a lawsuit of selling pure-bred puppies from “puppy mills” in violation of new state law.  (David Middlecamp / San Luis Obispo Tribune photo)

A pet store with locations in San Luis Obispo County is being accused of selling pure-bred puppies acquired from so-called “puppy mills,” in violation of a recent state law, according to a lawsuit filed by an animal rights group.

Animal Kingdom Pet Shop, which has locations in Pismo Beach, Grover Beach and Santa Maria, is named as a defendant in the lawsuit alongside Bark Adoptions, an alleged animal rescue nonprofit, and an Iowa animal shelter accused of circumventing laws prohibiting the brick-and-mortar sale of privately bred animals.

Lawsuits represent just one side of the story, and the businesses have not filed responses in San Luis Obispo Superior Court.

Adam Tipton of Arroyo Grande, who California business records list as the agent of service for Animal Kingdom Pet Shop, declined to comment on the allegations when reached by phone Wednesday, citing the pending lawsuit.

A case management conference for the lawsuit is scheduled for July.

The complaint was filed March 5 by the nonprofit dog advocacy group Bailing Out Benji and by attorneys for the Animal Legal Defense Fund and seeks court intervention in the operation of the businesses.

According to the complaint, Animal Kingdom is involved in a “puppy laundering operation,” selling dogs ill-gotten from less-than-reputable breeders who do not follow animal welfare and other guidelines. The lawsuit defines so-called “puppy mills” as “places where mother dogs are kept in small and squalid cages to give birth to a constant inventory of puppies for retail sale.”

state law passed two years ago that went into effect at the beginning of this year requires storefront pet shops to acquire their dogs, cats and rabbits from nonprofit animal shelters or rescue groups.

The law has led to the hasty formation of nonprofits across the state claiming to be rescue organizations in recent months, Eric Anderson, San Luis Obispo County’s Director of Animal Services, said by phone Wednesday.

Bark Adoptions, the nonprofit named in the lawsuit as allegedly doing business with Animal Kingdom, is not currently registered as a 501(c)(3) nonprofit, according to the database GuideStar.

“Bark Adoptions masquerades as a nonprofit animal rescue organization even though it actually acquires purebred and designer puppies that are only a few weeks old from puppy mills, including (co-defendant) Rescue Pets Iowa Corp., and then conveys those puppies to pet stores for profit, including (Animal Kingdom),” the lawsuit reads.

Difficult to determine legitimacy with new law

According to state records, Bark Adoptions registered itself as a corporation on Nov. 30, 2018, about a month before the law went into effect, and the earliest posts on its Facebook page were made Dec. 15. Animal Kingdom has been in business since 2002.

The lawsuit states that to satisfy its long-standing business model of getting its dogs through “mills,” it now “obtains the same puppy dogs through a sham rescue operation, Bark Adoptions, who in turn obtains the puppies from puppy mills like Iowa Pets in what amounts to a puppy laundering scheme.”

The lawsuit states that volunteer members of Bailing Out Benji have been visiting small pet stores across the state to educate owners of the puppy mill ban and ensure compliance with the new law. The local lawsuit arose from such a visit by the group, it says.

The lawsuit was also filed after an investigation by KSBY-TV found that Bark Adoptions acquired its dogs from Iowa Pets for supply to at least one local store.

Anderson, the county’s animal services director, said the owners of Animal Kingdom and Bark Adoptions have provided the county with documentation the agency requested related to its businesses and the nonprofit.

Anderson said that while well-intentioned in reducing the harmful effects of puppy mills, the new law also created loopholes that makes it difficult to discern whether nonprofit rescues are legitimate, and law allows for newly formed nonprofits to operate while their 501(c)(3) paperwork is being processed, as long as it appears they are operating under the provisions of laws guiding nonprofits.

Though he said “it appears there are some pretty serious questions about the legitimacy” of Bark Adoptions, Anderson said the county is still reviewing the entities’ records.

Should the county find violations, it could fine the businesses up to $500 per animal, he said.

[Click here for more stories from The San Luis Obispo Tribune.]

Support Noozhawk Today!

Our professional journalists work tirelessly to report on local news so you can be more informed and engaged in your community. This quality, local reporting is free for you to read and share, but it's not free to produce.

You count on us to deliver timely, relevant local news, 24/7. Can we count on you to invest in our newsroom and help secure its future?

We provide special member benefits to show how much we appreciate your support.

I would like give...
Great! You're joining as a Red-Tailed Hawk!
  • Ask
  • Vote
  • Investigate
  • Answer

Noozhawk Asks: What’s Your Question?

Welcome to Noozhawk Asks, a new feature in which you ask the questions, you help decide what Noozhawk investigates, and you work with us to find the answers.

Here’s how it works: You share your questions with us in the nearby box. In some cases, we may work with you to find the answers. In others, we may ask you to vote on your top choices to help us narrow the scope. And we’ll be regularly asking you for your feedback on a specific issue or topic.

We also expect to work together with the reader who asked the winning questions to find the answer together. Noozhawk’s objective is to come at questions from a place of curiosity and openness, and we believe a transparent collaboration is the key to achieve it.

The results of our investigation will be published here in this Noozhawk Asks section. Once or twice a month, we plan to do a review of what was asked and answered.

Thanks for asking!

Click Here to Get Started >

Reader Comments

Noozhawk is no longer accepting reader comments on our articles. Click here for the announcement. Readers are instead invited to submit letters to the editor by emailing them to [email protected]. Please provide your full name and community, as well as contact information for verification purposes only.