Sunday, October 21 , 2018, 10:55 pm | Fair 59º

 
 
 
 

Federal Regulators Determine External Pipeline Corrosion Caused Refugio Oil Spill

Preliminary investigation report finds Plains All American Pipeline's corrosion control system is not working in Santa Barbara County

Federal regulators from the Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Administration released a preliminary report into the Refugio Oil Spill investigation Wednesday. Administrator Marie Therese Dominguez, center, said external corrosion caused the spill.
Federal regulators from the Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Administration released a preliminary report into the Refugio Oil Spill investigation Wednesday. Administrator Marie Therese Dominguez, center, said external corrosion caused the spill.  (Giana Magnoli / Noozhawk photo)

External corrosion was the cause of the Refugio Oil Spill, federal regulators said in a preliminary report on the investigation of the ruptured pipeline that leaked crude oil onto the shoreline of southern Santa Barbara County.

There is an extensive timeline in the preliminary report but no insights into what caused the corrosion, why the in-line inspection tools failed to recognize significant corrosion levels, or why the pipeline operated for another 35 minutes after the rupture happened.

Officials from the U.S. Department of Transportation’s Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Administration are investigating the “failure” that caused the May 19, 2015 spill near Refugio State Beach, during which a Plains All American Pipeline burst and spilled up to 142,800 gallons of crude oil onto the shoreline and into the ocean.

“Plains’ existing corrosion control system is not preventing external corrosion of the pipe under insulation,” according to the report.

Scroll down to read the full preliminary report from PHMSA.

PHMSA Administrator Marie Therese Dominguez visited the spill site Wednesday and later spoke about the findings along with Rep. Lois Capps, D-Santa Barbara.

The agency ordered Plains to shut down and purge the oil out of both of its Santa Barbara County pipelines due to concerns about corrosion, since the investigators at the rupture site found a wall thickness of 1/16 of an inch while recent inspections indicated it was much thicker. 

“This is an instance where the inspection tools miscalculated the corrosion,” Dominguez said.

When asked if this is a common occurrence with in-line inspection tools, Dominguez said the inspection tools are usually very thorough, but operators also get opportunities to get additional data with digs.

After the shutdowns, ExxonMobil, Venoco, Inc., and Freeport McMoRan stopped offshore oil production since there is no approved oil transportation system to replace the pipes. 

There is still no estimate on what kind of work has to be done for Plains to restart the pipelines.

The factors that led to the corrosion, and other critical pieces of the investigation, will be in the final report coming out in spring, Dominguez said.

PHMSA released the preliminary report as an effort to be more transparent in its operations, she said. The report was posted on the agency’s website after the Wednesday afternoon press conference at the Santa Barbara Courthouse. 

Capps said the spill had a “tremendous impact” on Santa Barbara County, economically and environmentally.

She called fossil fuels “dirty, expensive, dangerous” and said she is hoping to reauthorize pipeline safety legislation after the spill.

Preliminary findings in the report say the leak occurred between 10:55 and 10:56 a.m. and Plains shut down Line 901 about 35 minutes later because of problems at the Sisquoc Station on Line 903.

A petroleum smell was reported at 11:42 p.m. and Santa Barbara County Fire Department personnel along with a Plains representative found the culvert where oil crossed under Highway 101 to Refugio Beach.

“The Plains representative, along with Fire Department personnel, attempted to stop the flow of oil into the culvert,” the report says of the oil discovery.

“However, the culvert was too large to stop the flow with shovels and sand bags were not readily available so their efforts were unsuccessful. As soon as additional equipment and personnel arrived, the culvert was dammed so the oil was stopped from entering the culvert.”

Santa Barbara County released photographs of the corroded pipe section that show the gaping hole where it ruptured. 

Noozhawk managing editor Giana Magnoli can be reached at .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address). Follow Noozhawk on Twitter: @noozhawk, @NoozhawkNews and @NoozhawkBiz. Connect with Noozhawk on Facebook.

Plains Preliminary Factual Report by Giana Magnoli

Support Noozhawk Today

You are an important ally in our mission to deliver clear, objective, high-quality professional news reporting for Santa Barbara, Goleta and the rest of Santa Barbara County. Join the Hawks Club today to help keep Noozhawk soaring.

We offer four membership levels: $5 a month, $10 a month, $25 a month or $1 a week. Payments can be made using a credit card, Apple Pay or Google Pay, or click here for information on recurring credit-card payments and a mailing address for checks.

Thank you for your vital support.

Become a Noozhawk Supporter

First name
Last name
Email
Select your monthly membership
Or choose an annual membership
×

Payment Information

Membership Subscription

You are enrolling in . Thank you for joining the Hawks Club.

Payment Method

Pay by Credit Card:

Mastercard, Visa, American Express, Discover
One click only, please!

Pay with Apple Pay or Google Pay:

Noozhawk partners with Stripe to provide secure invoicing and payments processing.
You may cancel your membership at any time by sending an email to .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address).

  • Ask
  • Vote
  • Investigate
  • Answer

Noozhawk Asks: What’s Your Question?

Welcome to Noozhawk Asks, a new feature in which you ask the questions, you help decide what Noozhawk investigates, and you work with us to find the answers.

Here’s how it works: You share your questions with us in the nearby box. In some cases, we may work with you to find the answers. In others, we may ask you to vote on your top choices to help us narrow the scope. And we’ll be regularly asking you for your feedback on a specific issue or topic.

We also expect to work together with the reader who asked the winning questions to find the answer together. Noozhawk’s objective is to come at questions from a place of curiosity and openness, and we believe a transparent collaboration is the key to achieve it.

The results of our investigation will be published here in this Noozhawk Asks section. Once or twice a month, we plan to do a review of what was asked and answered.

Thanks for asking!

Click Here to Get Started >

Reader Comments

Noozhawk is no longer accepting reader comments on our articles. Click here for the announcement. Readers are instead invited to submit letters to the editor by emailing them to [email protected]. Please provide your full name and community, as well as contact information for verification purposes only.

Daily Noozhawk

Subscribe to Noozhawk's A.M. Report, our free e-Bulletin sent out every day at 4:15 a.m. with Noozhawk's top stories, hand-picked by the editors.

Sign Up Now >