Tuesday, July 17 , 2018, 1:00 pm | Partly Cloudy 69º

 
 
 

Playing Cuttlefish with the Budget

Schwarzenegger has only himself to blame for the financial fix California is in.

Abraham Lincoln finally had enough of Stephen Douglas’ obfuscations when they met to debate in Charleston, Ill.

“Judge Douglas is playing cuttlefish," he said. "A small species of fish that has no mode of defending himself when pursued except by throwing out a black fluid which makes the water so dark the enemy cannot see it, and thus it escapes.”{mosimage}

Lincoln’s cuttlefish story came to mind during Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger’s State of the State message when he blamed California’s massive budget deficit on formulae that lock in spending. On the same day, a gubernatorial minion penned a column that claimed, “About 90 percent of the state’s budget is tied to spending formulas, contracts and/or statutes, requiring spending to increase by specific amounts each year.”

Behind that cloud of sophistry is a species of politician trying to escape responsibility for a budget crisis of his own making.

In fact, virtually all of the “formulas, contracts and/or statutes” can be suspended with the same two-thirds vote that is required to adopt the budget in the first place. Our budget crisis isn’t because these politicians can’t suspend these “mandates” — it’s because they won’t.

True, there are a few expenditures required by the state Constitution. California’s annual debt payments can’t be suspended, although less borrowing can reduce them in the future. Unfortunately, Schwarzenegger’s borrowing binge has increased our annual debt obligation to more than $7 billion today from $2 billion in 2003.

California’s pension payments are contractual obligations that can’t be suspended, but shrinking the public workforce or reforming pensions for new hires can reduce future obligations. Unfortunately, under Schwarzenegger, the state employee rolls have grown at nearly twice the rate of population growth.

In addition, there is one ballot proposition that is beyond the control of the Legislature and the governor to suspend: Schwarzenegger’s own “After School Program” that now consumes roughly a half-billion dollars each year.

Everything else can be suspended by the same vote that adopts the budget — including every statute on the books. Even most constitutional mandates provide for their own suspension. For example, Proposition 98, which “mandates” that nearly half of the budget must go to public schools, can be suspended by a two-thirds vote. Not only did Schwarzenegger refuse to do so through the last three years of declining public school enrollment, he increased the Prop. 98 base — and therefore future budgets — by billions of dollars above what Prop. 98 called for. That is precisely why he is now forced to propose school cuts that are far deeper than would otherwise have been necessary.

Similarly, the Legislature can force virtually any contract back to the bargaining table by refusing to fund it fully in the annual budget act. When state Sen. Jackie Speier and I proposed doing so in 2004 in an attempt to bring state prison guard salaries under control, Schwarzenegger opposed it. Now, four years later, he proposes releasing 22,000 dangerous felons.

Perhaps the most telling point is simply this: when Senate Republicans desperately warned last summer that the budget was dangerously unbalanced and attempted to enact reforms to avert the crisis, Schwarzenegger campaigned against them.

When the budget was adopted in August, I warned on the Senate floor, “Today we set in motion events that will require far more difficult and painful decisions starting just five months from now in what is likely to be a much worse economy. … For the second time in a decade, this state is being driven to another Gray Davis-sized fiscal crisis.”

The same day, Schwarzenegger said, “I am pleased that the Legislature has passed a responsible budget that protects California’s priorities and keeps our economy strong. It was a challenging process but in the end our legislative leaders came together to deliver a spending plan that does not raise taxes, creates the largest reserve in history, and reduces our operating deficit after the spending vetoes that I have promised.”

It’s going to require more than a cloud of rhetorical ink to cover that escape.

State Sen. Tom McClintock, R-Thousand Oaks, represents Santa Barbara in the 19th District.

Support Noozhawk Today

You are an important ally in our mission to deliver clear, objective, high-quality professional news reporting for Santa Barbara, Goleta and the rest of Santa Barbara County. Join the Hawks Club today to help keep Noozhawk soaring.

We offer four membership levels: $5 a month, $10 a month, $25 a month or $1 a week. Payments can be made through Stripe below, or click here for information on recurring credit-card payments and a mailing address for checks.

Thank you for your vital support.

Become a Noozhawk Supporter

First name
Last name
Enter your email
Select your membership level
×

Payment Information

You are purchasing:

Payment Method

Pay by Credit Card:

Mastercard, Visa, American Express, Discover
One click only, please!

Pay with Apple Pay or Google Pay:

Noozhawk partners with Stripe to provide secure invoicing and payments processing.

  • Ask
  • Vote
  • Investigate
  • Answer

Noozhawk Asks: What’s Your Question?

Welcome to Noozhawk Asks, a new feature in which you ask the questions, you help decide what Noozhawk investigates, and you work with us to find the answers.

Here’s how it works: You share your questions with us in the nearby box. In some cases, we may work with you to find the answers. In others, we may ask you to vote on your top choices to help us narrow the scope. And we’ll be regularly asking you for your feedback on a specific issue or topic.

We also expect to work together with the reader who asked the winning questions to find the answer together. Noozhawk’s objective is to come at questions from a place of curiosity and openness, and we believe a transparent collaboration is the key to achieve it.

The results of our investigation will be published here in this Noozhawk Asks section. Once or twice a month, we plan to do a review of what was asked and answered.

Thanks for asking!

Click Here to Get Started >

Reader Comments

Noozhawk is no longer accepting reader comments on our articles. Click here for the announcement. Readers are instead invited to submit letters to the editor by emailing them to [email protected]. Please provide your full name and community, as well as contact information for verification purposes only.

Daily Noozhawk

Subscribe to Noozhawk's A.M. Report, our free e-Bulletin sent out every day at 4:15 a.m. with Noozhawk's top stories, hand-picked by the editors.

Sign Up Now >