Friday, May 25 , 2018, 3:46 am | Fair 54º


Voters Value Environmental Stances in Upcoming Election, Says Public Policy Institute Survey

Ten years after California enacted AB 32, the landmark law mandating the reduction of greenhouse gas emissions, strong majorities of residents support its goals and favor a proposal to expand on them. These are among the key findings in a statewide survey released today by the Public Policy Institute of California (PPIC).

When Californians are asked if they favor or oppose the law requiring the state to reduce emissions to 1990 levels by the year 2020, 69 percent are in favor (19 percent oppose, 13 percent don’t know).

Among likely voters, 62 percent favor the law. There is a striking partisan divide. Majorities of Democrats (80 percent) and independents (56 percent) favor the law, compared to 44 percent of Republicans.

When the survey first asked this question in 2006, support was similar across parties (65 percent Republicans, 67 percent Democrats, 68 percent independents).

With the state on track to meet AB 32’s goals, a proposed new law would set more ambitious targets. The new legislation would require a reduction in emissions to 40 percent below 1990 levels by 2030.

When asked about this proposal, 68 percent of adults and 59 percent of likely voters favor it. Across parties, Democrats (78 percent) are twice as likely as Republicans (39 percent) to favor the expanded goals, while independents (59 percent) fall in between.

Californians couple their support for reducing emissions with an expectation of higher costs. Most adults and likely voters (59 percent each) say state action to reduce global warming will cause gasoline prices around the state to increase.

Among Californians who say gas prices will rise, 64 percent favor AB 32’s goals and 63 percent favor expanding them.

Also, majorities of adults and likely voters (56 percent each) say that to reduce global warming they are willing to pay more for electricity if it is generated by renewable sources like solar or wind.

Democrats (68 percent) and independents (51 percent) are more likely to be willing than Republicans (38 percent) to pay more.

“We find strong support today for the state’s greenhouse gas emissions targets set 10 years ago,” said Mark Baldassare, PPIC president and CEO. “The commitment to help reduce global warming includes a surprising willingness on the part of majorities of Californians to pay higher prices.”

Most Californians don’t expect actions to reduce warming to cost the state jobs: 40 percent of adults say the result will be more jobs, and 29 percent predict there will be no effect on the number of jobs. Just 20 percent think there will be fewer jobs because of the state’s actions.

Most Favor Cap and Trade

A majority of Californians (55 percent) say they have heard nothing about the state’s cap-and-trade system — a major part of the effort to achieve AB 32’s emissions reduction goal.

After hearing a short description of the system, 54 percent of adults say they favor it.

Transportation fuels have been included in the cap-and-trade system since 2015, and the Legislative Analyst estimated earlier this year that this has added 11 cents per gallon to the price of gasoline.

After hearing this cost estimate along with a brief list of programs that receive state cap-and-trade revenues, 52 percent of adults and 49 percent of likely voters favor including transportation fuels in the system (36 percent adults, 40 percent likely voters oppose).

A portion of cap-and-trade revenue is required by law to be spent on projects to improve environmental conditions in lower-income and disadvantaged communities. Half of Californians (51 percent) and 46 percent of likely voters say it is very important to spend some of the revenue this way.

Most Californians (81 percent adults, 75 percent likely voters) say global warming is a very serious or somewhat serious threat to the state’s future economy and quality of life.

Most (64 percent adults, 64 percent likely voters) say the effects of warming have already begun, while fewer (25 percent adults, 21 percent likely voters) say there will be effects in the future. Far fewer (8 percent adults, 13 percent likely voters) say they will never happen.

Most residents (65 percent) say global warming has contributed to California’s current wildfires.

Clinton Leads Trump 46-30 percent; Environmental Stances Seen as Important

With the November election approaching, likely voters were asked about their choices in the presidential and U.S. Senate races and the importance of candidates’ views on the environment.

In the presidential race, likely voters favor Hillary Clinton over Donald Trump (46 percent to 30 percent) — a larger margin than in the May survey (49 percent to 39 percent), which did not ask about third-party candidates.

Clinton has strong support among Democratic likely voters (81 percent) and leads Trump among independents (37 percent to 24 percent), while Trump has strong support among Republicans (76 percent).

The race is close among white likely voters, while Clinton has a large lead over Trump among Latinos and other racial/ethnic groups (sample sizes for Asian American and African American likely voters are too small for separate analysis).

Most likely voters say the candidates’ positions on the environment are very important (45 percent) or somewhat important (38 percent) in making their choice.

In the U.S. Senate matchup, which pits two Democrats against one another, likely voters prefer Kamala Harris to Loretta Sanchez (38 percent to 20 percent) — a larger margin than in May (34 percent to 26 percent).

Harris has majority support among Democrats (53 percent) and leads Sanchez among independents (37 percent to 19 percent). Half of Republicans (50 percent) volunteer that they do not plan to vote in this race.

Sanchez leads among Latinos, and Harris has large leads among whites and other racial/ethnic groups.

Harris leads Sanchez by 25 points overall (53 percent to 28 percent) when excluding the 28 percent of survey respondents who volunteer that they won’t vote in this race.

Again, most likely voters say the candidates’ positions on the environment are very (40 percent) or somewhat (43 percent) important in determining their vote.

Majorities Support Brown, Obama

The survey also asked about elected leaders at the state and national level.

» Gov. Jerry Brown: Majorities of adults (54 percent) and likely voters (53 percent) approve of the way Brown’s performance. About half (49 percent adults, 51 percent likely voters) approve of the way he is handling environmental issues.

» State legislature: California lawmakers have a job approval rating of 45 percent among all adults and 42 percent among likely voters. The approval rating for the legislature’s handling of environmental issues is similar (48 percent adults, 42 percent likely voters).

» President Barack Obama: Majorities (60 percent adults, 56 percent likely voters) approve of the president’s job performance and have similar opinions of how he is handling environmental issues (60 percent adults, 55 percent likely voters).

» U.S. Congress: Congress has much lower approval ratings for job performance (28 percent adults, 17 percent likely voters) and handling of environmental issues (31 percent adults, 17 percent likely voters).

Few Worry About Water, But It’s Still Top Environmental Issue

What is the most important environmental issue facing the state? Water supply and drought tops the list among Californians (38 percent), followed by air pollution (13 percent).

The proportion of residents naming drought and water supply as the top issue has dropped 20 points since July 2015 (58 percent).

Nonetheless, 62 percent of residents and 71 percent of likely voters say the supply of water is a big problem in their part of the state.

Residents in the Central Valley (71 percent) are the most likely to hold this view, and those in the San Francisco Bay Area (51 percent) are the least likely.

Now that statewide mandatory water reduction targets have been lifted, residents are asked to assess government action on the drought.

Majorities (58 percent adults, 63 percent likely voters) say state and local governments are not doing enough to respond.

“Water supply continues to top the list of environmental issues facing California even after an El Niño year,” Baldassare said. “With water restrictions lifted, many Californians are still calling for state and local governments to do more in responding to the drought.”

Water, Air Pollution Viewed as Health Threats in Lower-Income Areas

Asked about pollution of drinking water, 59 percent of Californians and 48 percent of likely voters say it is a more serious health threat in lower-income areas in their part of the state.

Latinos (76 percent), African Americans (65 percent) and Asian Americans (61 percent) are more likely than whites (46 percent) to express this view.

On the topic of air pollution, majorities (60 percent adults, 60 percent likely voters) say it is a big problem or somewhat of a problem in their part of the state.

Latinos (68 percent) and African Americans (62 percent) are more likely than whites (54 percent) and Asian Americans (51 percent) to call it a problem.

Half of adults (50 percent) and 42 percent of likely voters say air pollution is a more serious health threat in lower-income areas than elsewhere in their part of the state.

Latinos (65 percent) are more likely than Asian Americans and African Americans (52 percent each) to express this view and far more likely than whites (37 percent), and 53 percent of residents say air pollution is a very serious or somewhat serious threat to themselves and their immediate families.

Among racial/ethnic groups, Latinos (62 percent) and African Americans (61 percent) are the most likely to hold this view.

“Many Californians perceive that lower-income communities face more serious health threats from air and water pollution,” Baldassare said. “Latino residents are the most likely to express these concerns.”

Opposition to Fracking Reaches Record High

The survey asked a series of questions about energy policy.

» Fracking: Majorities (58 percent adults, 60 percent likely voters) oppose the increased use of hydraulic fracturing — a record high since the survey first began asking this question in 2013.

» Oil drilling: Similar numbers of Californians (59 percent adults, 61 percent likely voters) oppose increased oil drilling off the California coast.

» Power plant emissions: Strong majorities (74 percent adults, 69 percent likely voters) favor setting stricter emission limits on power plants to address climate change.

» Solar power: Overwhelming majorities favor increasing tax credits and financial incentives for rooftop solar panels in California (76 percent adults, 77 percent likely voters) and building more solar power stations in the state (85 percent adults, 79 percent likely voters).

» Electric vehicles: The new state budget does not include money to extend subsidies for electric vehicle purchases. When asked about increasing tax credits and financial incentives for buying an electric vehicle, most adults and likely voters (68 percent each) are in favor. Most (77 percent adults, 74 percent likely voters) also favor building more charging stations and infrastructure to support electric vehicles. Just under half (47 percent) say they have seriously considered buying or leasing an electric vehicle.

About the Survey

The PPIC Statewide Survey was conducted with funding from The Dirk and Charlene Kabcenell Foundation, the Heising-Simons Foundation, the Pisces Foundation and the S. D. Bechtel, Jr. Foundation.

Survey methods, questions and content are determined solely by PPIC. This is the 16th annual PPIC Statewide Survey on environmental issues since 2000.

Findings are based on a telephone survey of 1,703 California adult residents — including 853 interviewed on landline telephones and 850 on cell phones — from July 10-19, 2016.

During this fielding period, Donald Trump announced his choice of running mate. Hillary Clinton announced her choice afterward.

Interviews were conducted in English or Spanish, according to respondents’ preferences.

The sampling error, taking design effects from weighting into consideration, is ±3.5 percent for all adults, ±3.8 percent for the 1,373 registered voters, and ±4.3 percent for the 1,056 likely voters.

Mark Baldassare is president and CEO of PPIC, where he holds the Arjay and Frances Fearing Miller Chair in Public Policy. He is founder of the PPIC Statewide Survey, which he has directed since 1998.

PPIC is dedicated to informing and improving public policy in California through independent, objective, nonpartisan research on major economic, social and political issues.

The institute was established in 1994 with an endowment from William R. Hewlett.

PPIC does not take or support positions on any ballot measure or on any local, state or federal legislation, nor does it endorse, support or oppose any political parties or candidates for public office.

— Linda Strean is the director of media and web for Public Policy Institute of California.


Support Noozhawk Today

You are an important ally in our mission to deliver clear, objective, high-quality professional news reporting for Santa Barbara, Goleta and the rest of Santa Barbara County. Join the Hawks Club today to help keep Noozhawk soaring.

We offer four membership levels: $5 a month, $10 a month, $25 a month or $1 a week. Payments can be made through PayPal below, or click here for information on recurring credit-card payments.

Thank you for your vital support.

Become a Supporter

Enter your email
Select your membership level

Payment Information

You are purchasing:

Payment Method

Pay by Credit Card:

Mastercard, Visa, American Express, Discover

Pay with Apple Pay or Google Pay:

Noozhawk partners with Stripe to provide secure invoicing and payments processing.

  • Ask
  • Vote
  • Investigate
  • Answer

Noozhawk Asks: What’s Your Question?

Welcome to Noozhawk Asks, a new feature in which you ask the questions, you help decide what Noozhawk investigates, and you work with us to find the answers.

Here’s how it works: You share your questions with us in the nearby box. In some cases, we may work with you to find the answers. In others, we may ask you to vote on your top choices to help us narrow the scope. And we’ll be regularly asking you for your feedback on a specific issue or topic.

We also expect to work together with the reader who asked the winning questions to find the answer together. Noozhawk’s objective is to come at questions from a place of curiosity and openness, and we believe a transparent collaboration is the key to achieve it.

The results of our investigation will be published here in this Noozhawk Asks section. Once or twice a month, we plan to do a review of what was asked and answered.

Thanks for asking!

Click Here to Get Started >

Reader Comments

Noozhawk is no longer accepting reader comments on our articles. Click here for the announcement. Readers are instead invited to submit letters to the editor by emailing them to [email protected]. Please provide your full name and community, as well as contact information for verification purposes only.

Daily Noozhawk

Subscribe to Noozhawk's A.M. Report, our free e-Bulletin sent out every day at 4:15 a.m. with Noozhawk's top stories, hand-picked by the editors.

Sign Up Now >