Wednesday, August 15 , 2018, 11:55 pm | Fair 71º

 
 
 
 

Randy Alcorn: Voters Still Looking for Change They Can Believe In

Donald Trump and Bernie Sanders have made the usually tedious political season fascinating, and have rekindled hope for change people can believe in — something President Barack Obama promised but couldn’t deliver to the satisfaction of many Americans.

Whether either of these two guys, if elected president, could do any better is questionable.

Nevertheless, the very strength of their campaigns — Trump effectively winning the Republican Party nomination while Sanders coming out of left field nearly toppled the Democratic Party’s anointed candidate — is by itself evidence of change many voters believe in and want.

Hillary Clinton is the only establishment candidate left in the race, and about the only real change she offers as president is her gender. That may not be enough to slake voter’s thirst for change.

They tried that kind of change by electing the first black president. It appears that this time around many voters are looking for more substantial change than the novelty of the first female president.

Most observers understand that the stunning success of Trump and Sanders derives from widespread disaffection with a skewed economic system that favors the few while neglecting the many, and with disgust with a political system that not only does nothing about it but also is complicit in it.

People anxious about an economy in which the new normal is job insecurity, stagnant wages and multiple threats from America’s brand of rapacious corporate capitalism are drifting into hopelessness. They are angry about their declining economic status and their diminishing prospects.

While the political establishment squabbles over ideological distractions like who can use which restroom, be married or have birth control, most Americans have more urgent concerns. They don’t care so much about ideological or theological debates.

You can’t keep preaching trickle-down economics to a dwindling middle class, or God’s will to folks whose prayers go unanswered and expect them to keep the faith.

For these people the status quo is unacceptable. They want revolutionary change. Not the kind with pitchforks and guillotines — not yet anyway — but rather a repudiation of the current political-economic system that is making the American Dream more myth than reality.

That is why they will vote for an avowed democratic-socialist no matter how insistently that label is twisted to discredit him. That is why they will vote for a bragging, bloviating billionaire no matter how suspect his ethics and improbable his promises.

These angry, restless voters don’t care what the political intelligentsia says. They want sweeping change and these two guys embody that, if for no other reason than that neither is a creature of the established political order.

Both candidates are promising to rescue the beleaguered middle class, and have cleverly used the duopoly machinery to engineer their drives on Washington — Trump’s drive fueled mostly by his own finances, while Sanders’ is fueled by millions of small donors. Citizens United has failed the established order to put down these two popular insurrections.

But then, there is Hillary.

She is essentially the establishment’s mainstay — regardless of political party. Clinton’s positions and record on economic issues and foreign affairs are more like those of a moderate Republican than an aggressive-progressive Democrat.

One of the intriguing ironies of this surprising election cycle is that a growing number of Republicans are considering voting for Clinton rather than for Trump, while some disappointed Sanders supporters are pledging to vote for Trump rather than Clinton.

This faltering allegiance to political party and indifference to ideological imperatives indicate that voters are focused on what really matters the most to them — their personal economic well-being. Division among the body politic is less about political party or ideological beliefs than it is about the widening crevasse between those with more and more, and those with less and less.

The current voter uprising is against a political system controlled by the forces of greed that has captured government, in no small part by limiting candidates for public office to those approved by the established duopoly, which is the creature of those forces.

Both Trump and Sanders have shaken the established order by hijacking its creature, rallying angry voters and threatening the status quo. Either man winning the presidency would be a revolution in that it would confirm vast voter demand for deep change.

And while an establishment Congress could impede that change, it could not ignore the voters for long and survive ensuing elections.

For reasons that should be obvious to rational minds, Trump is unsuitable to be president. He has exhausted his usefulness for revolutionary change. He should be thanked for crippling one leg of the duopoly then sent back to his gilded tower.

For voters sincerely committed to instigating revolutionary change, Sanders is the only remaining viable candidate for president. But, his path to the nomination has been all but barricaded by the Democratic Party’s super-delegate skullduggery.

In a Clinton versus Trump contest, Clinton should win — if rational people are the majority of voters. However, Clinton is widely unpopular, an inveterate member of the entrenched economic elite, she is no revolutionary. Against Trump, Sanders is a stronger opponent than is Clinton.

If the Democratic Party establishment has underestimated the tide of voter anger, Trump is the next president. That troublesome outcome would be the final ironic twist in the squirming duopoly’s scheming to hold on to it all.

— Randy Alcorn is a Santa Barbara political observer. Contact him at .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address), or click here to read previous columns. The opinions expressed are his own.

Support Noozhawk Today

You are an important ally in our mission to deliver clear, objective, high-quality professional news reporting for Santa Barbara, Goleta and the rest of Santa Barbara County. Join the Hawks Club today to help keep Noozhawk soaring.

We offer four membership levels: $5 a month, $10 a month, $25 a month or $1 a week. Payments can be made through Stripe below, or click here for information on recurring credit-card payments and a mailing address for checks.

Thank you for your vital support.

Become a Noozhawk Supporter

First name
Last name
Enter your email
Select your membership level
×

Payment Information

You are purchasing:

Payment Method

Pay by Credit Card:

Mastercard, Visa, American Express, Discover
One click only, please!

Pay with Apple Pay or Google Pay:

Noozhawk partners with Stripe to provide secure invoicing and payments processing.

  • Ask
  • Vote
  • Investigate
  • Answer

Noozhawk Asks: What’s Your Question?

Welcome to Noozhawk Asks, a new feature in which you ask the questions, you help decide what Noozhawk investigates, and you work with us to find the answers.

Here’s how it works: You share your questions with us in the nearby box. In some cases, we may work with you to find the answers. In others, we may ask you to vote on your top choices to help us narrow the scope. And we’ll be regularly asking you for your feedback on a specific issue or topic.

We also expect to work together with the reader who asked the winning questions to find the answer together. Noozhawk’s objective is to come at questions from a place of curiosity and openness, and we believe a transparent collaboration is the key to achieve it.

The results of our investigation will be published here in this Noozhawk Asks section. Once or twice a month, we plan to do a review of what was asked and answered.

Thanks for asking!

Click Here to Get Started >

Reader Comments

Noozhawk is no longer accepting reader comments on our articles. Click here for the announcement. Readers are instead invited to submit letters to the editor by emailing them to [email protected]. Please provide your full name and community, as well as contact information for verification purposes only.

Daily Noozhawk

Subscribe to Noozhawk's A.M. Report, our free e-Bulletin sent out every day at 4:15 a.m. with Noozhawk's top stories, hand-picked by the editors.

Sign Up Now >