Friday, May 25 , 2018, 11:15 am | Partly Cloudy 64º


Ron Fink: Lompoc Swap Meet Indecisiveness — What Will the Council Do This Time?

The Lompoc City Council deals with many issues just like every other elected body. Some are mundane, and others attract considerable attention.

The Lompoc swap meet is one of those issues that just won’t go away. This event is very popular and it has a huge attendance every week. You would think that an event that draws this many people to the Old Town area would be a boon for local business people, but they say they only get folks who want to use their bathrooms.

Since it‘s city property, I checked to see how they are able to use a publicly owned parking lot. During public hearings in 2004, the council, acting as the Redevelopment Agency, directed staff to establish a new contract.

At that time, the city administrator recommended that the city should not renew the swap meet contract because of a “variety of complaints from neighboring interests,” but contrary to this recommendation the city the council directed that a new contract be executed.

According to a news report in March 2004, staff reported to the council that “a spot check of vendors in late February found that only 26 of 45 vendors had purchased a city business license.  Another 45 vendors had no records on file with the meet’s concessionaire.”

Somehow in 2004 the council, contrary to staff testimony, concluded that, “Historically the revenue earned from the operation of the swap meet has been used to pay for city staff time to monitor the activity on the premises. The RDA has agreed to continue to pay all fees received from the concessionaire services contract to the city to reimburse Parks and Recreation staff for their services.”

Finally three years later, in 2007, a three-year contract was signed and it ended in 2010; for the last four years and since the RDA’s demise, they appear to have been operating month-to-month.

Since this action was on the consent calendar, no public discussion occurred.

There have been two council meetings on this issue in the past couple of months — this time the council decided to terminate the city’s relationship with swap meet organizers. But recently swap meet supporters generated a flash mob at the beginning of two council meetings and tried to get their case reconsidered.

This is an election year, and the incumbents who are seeking re-election saw the large crowd and agreed to discuss it again.

There are many other events in the community, but those event organizers have current contracts and permits with the city and they work very hard to keep their events under control. One nearby event is the Old Town Market that occurs for several Friday nights each summer. In this case, the event organizers have worked closely with local businesses to make sure that their vendors use public parking lots instead of private ones and that they don’t leave a mess when they are done.

The swap meet tried to move but after only one weekend the organizers were asked to leave primarily because they didn’t have the appropriate permits — one of the many problems that exist at their current location.

Since the swap meet has a large number of Hispanic customers, one prominent local resident said, “More than one Anglo has said to me, if the swap meet was all Caucasian this wouldn’t be happening.” Throwing the “race card” is the last resort for people who are losing the argument because they don’t have facts on their side and reflects poorly on our community and the person who said it.

So, how do we fix the problem? Neighbors say that either banning the activity or moving it would fix it.

Since this is really a retail operation and not a traditional swap meet, the council could consider renegotiating the contract with the organizers. Included in any contract must be mitigations for all of the issues that have impacted the neighbors for over 25 years.

Other issues include establishing a new fee schedule to recover city costs and to strengthen the contract compliance/monitoring effort, specifically ensuring that each vendor has the proper sales license and pays the appropriate sales tax. Allowing the event organizers to “self-police” hasn’t worked before and is still a problem today, which is why people object to the way it’s being run.

This is a very popular event, but organizers, vendors and patrons need to realize that they are responsible to the community and more importantly the neighbors surrounding their event to make sure that it doesn’t adversely impact the neighborhood.

The council should keep a sharp eye on what’s going on; if the organizers can’t fix all the problems associated with their event, then the council should consider suspending their permit.

I am sure that none of the participants wants this to happen, so city and neighbor support of this event rests on their shoulders.

— Ron Fink, a Lompoc resident since 1975, is retired from the aerospace industry and has been active with Lompoc municipal government commissions and committee since 1992, including 12 years on the Lompoc Planning Commission. He is also a voting member of the Santa Barbara County Taxpayers Association. Contact him at [email protected]. The opinions expressed are his own.

Support Noozhawk Today

You are an important ally in our mission to deliver clear, objective, high-quality professional news reporting for Santa Barbara, Goleta and the rest of Santa Barbara County. Join the Hawks Club today to help keep Noozhawk soaring.

We offer four membership levels: $5 a month, $10 a month, $25 a month or $1 a week. Payments can be made through PayPal below, or click here for information on recurring credit-card payments.

Thank you for your vital support.

Become a Supporter

Enter your email
Select your membership level

Payment Information

You are purchasing:

Payment Method

Pay by Credit Card:

Mastercard, Visa, American Express, Discover

Pay with Apple Pay or Google Pay:

Noozhawk partners with Stripe to provide secure invoicing and payments processing.

  • Ask
  • Vote
  • Investigate
  • Answer

Noozhawk Asks: What’s Your Question?

Welcome to Noozhawk Asks, a new feature in which you ask the questions, you help decide what Noozhawk investigates, and you work with us to find the answers.

Here’s how it works: You share your questions with us in the nearby box. In some cases, we may work with you to find the answers. In others, we may ask you to vote on your top choices to help us narrow the scope. And we’ll be regularly asking you for your feedback on a specific issue or topic.

We also expect to work together with the reader who asked the winning questions to find the answer together. Noozhawk’s objective is to come at questions from a place of curiosity and openness, and we believe a transparent collaboration is the key to achieve it.

The results of our investigation will be published here in this Noozhawk Asks section. Once or twice a month, we plan to do a review of what was asked and answered.

Thanks for asking!

Click Here to Get Started >

Reader Comments

Noozhawk is no longer accepting reader comments on our articles. Click here for the announcement. Readers are instead invited to submit letters to the editor by emailing them to [email protected]. Please provide your full name and community, as well as contact information for verification purposes only.

Daily Noozhawk

Subscribe to Noozhawk's A.M. Report, our free e-Bulletin sent out every day at 4:15 a.m. with Noozhawk's top stories, hand-picked by the editors.

Sign Up Now >