Friday, May 25 , 2018, 12:29 am | Overcast 59º

 
 
 
 

Ron Fink: Too little Cash to Run Government; Why?

Cities and the county of Santa Barbara are short cash for their General Fund budgets. Why?

The General Fund, used for public safety, parks, street repairs and other general services receive revenue from sales and property taxes.

Some parts of the GF, like recreation, parks, planning and development functions partially pay for themselves by user fees that are supplemented by the GF.

Why isn’t there enough money?

Forty-eight percent of the county is owned by the federal government and is not taxed; local and federal government contractors and nonprofits who purchase supplies on the local economy do not pay local sales taxes.

In Lompoc, public housing providers such as the Housing Authority of the County of Santa Barbara and its affiliate partner Surf Development Company, manage 451 rental units.

Those rentals were either acquired or developed using low income-housing tax credits, housing revenue bonds, or other financing. Other cities and the unincorporated areas are faced with similar conditions.

In the past few years, the only housing projects built in Lompoc have been public housing.

None of these projects pays into the property tax pool, even though the developer is guaranteed full occupancy and market rate-rental income by way of tenant rent and taxpayer subsidies for the units for either 30 or 55 years.

Another significant factor is that government facilities (school districts, county and city facilities) and nonprofit groups (churches, hospitals and some medical clinics) don’t pay property taxes either.
 
The city of Lompoc receives only 1 percent of sales tax revenue out of 7.25 percent collected; the county and state get the rest. 

The state Legislature controls the allocation of local property tax to the county and cities within each county. Lompoc only gets 1.1 percent of property taxes collected; the county gets 25.5 percent.

There is more.

Lompoc, the only full-service city in the county, might discontinue the practice of diverting fees collected for Enterprise Funds (electric, water and waste water) to bolster the GF.

The reason that fee diversion might be stopped is that residents pointed out this practice had been successfully challenged in other jurisdictions, and courts found the practice to be contrary to legislative policies.

This, combined with a lack of significant new commercial/industrial development, has created a situation where fewer dollars are available for general services.

A perplexing question is: Why aren’t projects currently approved being built?

Several hundred houses and a large industrial park already have been reviewed and we are anxiously awaiting the jobs and tax revenue that these projects could bring. But the land is still vacant and developers continue asking for time extensions.

To our north, Santa Maria continues to experience significant growth, and judging by the number of public facilities being built and staffed, General Fund dollars must be rolling in.

So, the question for Lompoc city leaders is: What does our neighbor to the north offer that Lompoc doesn’t?

The county recently stopped Venco operations near Gaviota by refusing to issue a permit to repair a leaking pipe; while the Get Oil Out and environmental lobby was cheering, the number one principal taxpayer declared bankruptcy and left the county.

They also succeeded in killing a Pacific Coast Energy Company project on an existing oil lease in Orcutt that would have produced significant tax revenues.

It doesn’t take much effort to see that these three supervisors, no matter who is sitting in their seats, will always support efforts to eliminate oil production in the county to appease their well-healed donors.

I guess they are unfamiliar with the economics of their decisions as they continue their assault on the golden goose of the General Fund.

Noozhawk reported that “The Santa Barbara County Board of Supervisors will consider budget cuts — including staff layoffs and pulling from its strategic reserve fund to close its projected $35 million gap for the 2017-18 fiscal year.”

The simple fact is that government services are not free; the more we ask for, the more it costs. If you want well-maintained parks and a robust public safety infrastructure, the government must have revenue.

How to raise the money to fund these services is a challenge.

So, considering the business-killing political philosophy of the three South Coast supervisors and a lack of development in Lompoc, it’s no wonder they are coming up short.

Which departments will suffer the largest cuts remains to be seen. A change of attitude is needed to attract new investment and improve the tax base.

What will be cut remains to be seen as budgets are finalized.

— Ron Fink, a Lompoc resident since 1975, is retired from the aerospace industry and has been active with Lompoc municipal government commissions and committee since 1992, including 12 years on the Lompoc Planning Commission. He is also a voting member of the Santa Barbara County Taxpayers Association. Contact him at [email protected]. Click here to read previous columns. The opinions expressed are his own.

Support Noozhawk Today

You are an important ally in our mission to deliver clear, objective, high-quality professional news reporting for Santa Barbara, Goleta and the rest of Santa Barbara County. Join the Hawks Club today to help keep Noozhawk soaring.

We offer four membership levels: $5 a month, $10 a month, $25 a month or $1 a week. Payments can be made through PayPal below, or click here for information on recurring credit-card payments.

Thank you for your vital support.

Become a Supporter

Enter your email
Select your membership level
×

Payment Information

You are purchasing:

Payment Method

Pay by Credit Card:

Mastercard, Visa, American Express, Discover

Pay with Apple Pay or Google Pay:

Noozhawk partners with Stripe to provide secure invoicing and payments processing.

  • Ask
  • Vote
  • Investigate
  • Answer

Noozhawk Asks: What’s Your Question?

Welcome to Noozhawk Asks, a new feature in which you ask the questions, you help decide what Noozhawk investigates, and you work with us to find the answers.

Here’s how it works: You share your questions with us in the nearby box. In some cases, we may work with you to find the answers. In others, we may ask you to vote on your top choices to help us narrow the scope. And we’ll be regularly asking you for your feedback on a specific issue or topic.

We also expect to work together with the reader who asked the winning questions to find the answer together. Noozhawk’s objective is to come at questions from a place of curiosity and openness, and we believe a transparent collaboration is the key to achieve it.

The results of our investigation will be published here in this Noozhawk Asks section. Once or twice a month, we plan to do a review of what was asked and answered.

Thanks for asking!

Click Here to Get Started >

Reader Comments

Noozhawk is no longer accepting reader comments on our articles. Click here for the announcement. Readers are instead invited to submit letters to the editor by emailing them to [email protected]. Please provide your full name and community, as well as contact information for verification purposes only.

Daily Noozhawk

Subscribe to Noozhawk's A.M. Report, our free e-Bulletin sent out every day at 4:15 a.m. with Noozhawk's top stories, hand-picked by the editors.

Sign Up Now >