Wednesday, July 18 , 2018, 10:53 pm | Fair 66º

 
 
 
 

Local News

Split Santa Barbara Council Discusses Whether to Assess Impact Fees on New Developments

As the number of housing development applications increase in Santa Barbara and as adequate funding for infrastructure continues to be scarce, the City Council scrutinized on Tuesday the possibility of assessing impact fees on new developments within the city.

The rationale behind development impact fees is that new housing, commercial and other projects have various impacts on the city, such as increased vehicle traffic or new wastewater lines, for which developers should have to help mitigate.

The council members expressed widely varying opinions on whether the fees ultimately would help or hinder the city’s financial and housing objectives. They ultimately voted 4-3 to bring back the idea as a “pending” project at next spring’s joint City Council-Planning Commission meeting, where the council can determine where it falls with its policy priorities.

Council members Frank Hotchkiss, Cathy Murillo and Gregg Hart dissented.

If approved, the impact fees would be charged to development applicants to cover part or all of the associated public improvements, services and amenities. The fees could go toward a variety of facilities, including sewer and water infrastructure, police and fire services, parks, libraries and schools.

They would be charged based on “the facility demand of the proposed use as measured by its type, size and location,” according to city staff.

Eighty-five cities and counties in California charge such fees, according to city staff, including Goleta, Carpinteria and Santa Barbara County.

Opponents of the fees, however, argue that they disincentivize development.

“We are in a situation in this city — and I’ve heard this from a couple of people already — where we have, generally, a very long and cumbersome process that costs a lot of money for people to develop,” Ken Oplinger, president and CEO of the Santa Barbara Region Chamber of Commerce, told the council.

“If we move down this road, we are going the opposite direction of affordability,” said Jeff Eckles, executive director of the Home Builders Association of the Central Coast.

Councilman Jason Dominguez argued that, even if impact fees aren’t in the best interest of developers, many of whom come from out of town, they represent a commitment by the council to help residents affected by developments in their neighborhoods.

“When we have a development impact fee, this is taking the seniors on the Eastside, the downtown and Westside and saying, ‘You know what, we’ve jammed all these (average-unit density program) projects into your neighborhood; we’re going to fix the impacts,’” he said.

If the council doesn’t consider the fees, he added, “we’re taking the priorities and the concerns of people who aren’t even potentially current Santa Barbara residents and elevating them above our residents who have been here for 10, 20, 40 years.”

Given the scope of the city’s infrastructure funding needs, Councilman Hart said, the money generated by the fees would make a negligible impact.

“The incremental additional revenue that would come from this significant effort is very, very small in relation to our needs,” he said. “In the Finance Committee, we have spent a lot of time — and the council is obviously very interested — in a long-term, sustainable solution to our infrastructure backlog. This is not relevant to that conversation.”

Councilman Bendy White, who was the driving force behind the proposal, took a different perspective.

“We need to be looking everywhere for additional funding,” he said. “I know there’s not going to be a silver bullet out there; there’s going to be a variety of smaller-caliber changes to our funding in order to make real progress on our unfunded liability.

“But development impact fees are one way to take one small bite out of this unfunded liability, out of this deficit.”

Money moved from certain capital improvement projects to street maintenance during the fiscal year 2017 budget process, White said, could have remained with those projects had money from impact fees been available to help plug those gaps.

Councilwoman Murillo argued that the city’s affordable housing stock should be the top priority, and even though any new source of revenue is important, she said couldn’t get behind a potential disincentive for developers looking to construct affordable housing.

Murillo, Hotchkiss and Mayor Helene Schneider expressed concern over the fairness of assessing the fee in the middle of the application process, after developers already have completed much of their other cost calculations.

A primary concern of the council was the extra workload that analyzing an impact fee program would add to city staff’s already-full plate. Unless it was deemed a top priority, City Administrator Paul Casey said, it could be most of a year before staff could begin working on it.

“We’re not ready to pull the trigger on this now, clearly, because this is our first bite of the apple,” Councilman Randy Rowse said. “Nobody really has a clear picture of any kind of results or what the potential could be for a yield. But I think we have to leave all the tools in the toolbox going forward.”

Noozhawk staff writer Sam Goldman can be reached at .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address). Follow Noozhawk on Twitter: @noozhawk, @NoozhawkNews and @NoozhawkBiz. Connect with Noozhawk on Facebook.

Support Noozhawk Today

You are an important ally in our mission to deliver clear, objective, high-quality professional news reporting for Santa Barbara, Goleta and the rest of Santa Barbara County. Join the Hawks Club today to help keep Noozhawk soaring.

We offer four membership levels: $5 a month, $10 a month, $25 a month or $1 a week. Payments can be made through Stripe below, or click here for information on recurring credit-card payments and a mailing address for checks.

Thank you for your vital support.

Become a Noozhawk Supporter

First name
Last name
Enter your email
Select your membership level
×

Payment Information

You are purchasing:

Payment Method

Pay by Credit Card:

Mastercard, Visa, American Express, Discover
One click only, please!

Pay with Apple Pay or Google Pay:

Noozhawk partners with Stripe to provide secure invoicing and payments processing.

  • Ask
  • Vote
  • Investigate
  • Answer

Noozhawk Asks: What’s Your Question?

Welcome to Noozhawk Asks, a new feature in which you ask the questions, you help decide what Noozhawk investigates, and you work with us to find the answers.

Here’s how it works: You share your questions with us in the nearby box. In some cases, we may work with you to find the answers. In others, we may ask you to vote on your top choices to help us narrow the scope. And we’ll be regularly asking you for your feedback on a specific issue or topic.

We also expect to work together with the reader who asked the winning questions to find the answer together. Noozhawk’s objective is to come at questions from a place of curiosity and openness, and we believe a transparent collaboration is the key to achieve it.

The results of our investigation will be published here in this Noozhawk Asks section. Once or twice a month, we plan to do a review of what was asked and answered.

Thanks for asking!

Click Here to Get Started >

Reader Comments

Noozhawk is no longer accepting reader comments on our articles. Click here for the announcement. Readers are instead invited to submit letters to the editor by emailing them to [email protected]. Please provide your full name and community, as well as contact information for verification purposes only.

Daily Noozhawk

Subscribe to Noozhawk's A.M. Report, our free e-Bulletin sent out every day at 4:15 a.m. with Noozhawk's top stories, hand-picked by the editors.

Sign Up Now >