Thursday, February 22 , 2018, 8:31 pm | Fair 49º


Local News

Santa Barbara City Council to Take Up District Elections Measure Proposed for November Ballot

For decades, Santa Barbara’s mayor and six council members have been chosen through at-large voting, in which they’re elected to represent the entire city rather than specific districts. Several groups have begun advocating for district elections or a hybrid system, however, asserting that some neighborhoods are under-represented.

Because of the debate, Mayor Helene Schneider and Councilman Bendy White want to discuss putting a measure on the November ballot to change the way officials are elected. They propose having four council members elected from geographically defined districts, with the mayor and two additional council members elected at-large.

Changing the system would take a City Charter amendment approved by a majority of Santa Barbara voters, Schneider said.

“There’s no way on Tuesday we can say this will go on,” she told Noozhawk, referring to Tuesday’s council meeting. “It’s a question of whether the majority is willing to work on details to put it on the ballot.”

It will have to be a very fast process to get the measure qualified in time for the Nov. 4 election, since ballot arguments and analysis are due to the Santa Barbara County Elections Office by July.

After this fall, the next municipal election is November 2015.

Schneider said she and White want to discuss district elections or a hybrid system because of similar conversations going on all over California and specific changes in Modesto, Palmdale and a few other cities.

Modesto changed to district elections in 2009, with a mayor elected at-large.

Last year, a Los Angeles County Superior Court judge found that Palmdale’s at-large elections violated the Voting Rights Act and ordered the entire City Council to leave office by July. The court decision created four districts but kept the mayor’s position at-large. The city is appealing the decision, according to the Los Angeles Times.

“Bendy and I thought we should be in front of the debate instead of behind it,” Schneider said. “We should have that discussion, and if we want to do something for this year, we need to get cracking.”

Under the hybrid system the pair is proposing as a starting point, all Santa Barbara residents would have a council majority representing them: the district representative, the two at-large council members and the at-large mayor.

There is already pushback on the at-large election system and former Councilman Leo Martinez and Zona Seca executive director Frank Banales have partnered up with high-powered trial attorney Barry Cappello to prepare a lawsuit against it. The three have said their suit will focus on the city’s lack of Latino council members, which they say is a conspicuous shortcoming in a city with a population that’s 38 percent Latino or Hispanic.

Cappello, a former city attorney, believes cities with district elections get a lot more done. He’s said the trio isn’t pursuing a ballot initiative of its own.

As of Friday, no lawsuit has been filed against the city.

Santa Maria recently rejected a petition to put a district elections measure on the ballot. The Central Coast Alliance United for a Sustainable Economy submitted 5,300 signatures but the City Clerk’s Office said the documents were formatted incorrectly and violated the state Elections Code.

The group plans to challenge that denial in court.

Tuesday’s City Council meeting starts at 2 p.m. in City Hall at 735 Anacapa St.

Noozhawk staff writer Giana Magnoli can be reached at .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address). Follow Noozhawk on Twitter: @noozhawk, @NoozhawkNews and @NoozhawkBiz. Connect with Noozhawk on Facebook.

  • Ask
  • Vote
  • Investigate
  • Answer

Noozhawk Asks: What’s Your Question?

Welcome to Noozhawk Asks, a new feature in which you ask the questions, you help decide what Noozhawk investigates, and you work with us to find the answers.

Here’s how it works: You share your questions with us in the nearby box. In some cases, we may work with you to find the answers. In others, we may ask you to vote on your top choices to help us narrow the scope. And we’ll be regularly asking you for your feedback on a specific issue or topic.

We also expect to work together with the reader who asked the winning questions to find the answer together. Noozhawk’s objective is to come at questions from a place of curiosity and openness, and we believe a transparent collaboration is the key to achieve it.

The results of our investigation will be published here in this Noozhawk Asks section. Once or twice a month, we plan to do a review of what was asked and answered.

Thanks for asking!

Click here to get started >

Support Noozhawk Today

You are an important ally in our mission to deliver clear, objective, high-quality professional news reporting for Santa Barbara, Goleta and the rest of Santa Barbara County. Join the Hawks Club today to help keep Noozhawk soaring.

We offer four membership levels: $5 a month, $10 a month, $25 a month or $1 a week. Payments can be made through PayPal below, or click here for information on recurring credit-card payments.

Thank you for your vital support.

Reader Comments

Noozhawk is no longer accepting reader comments on our articles. Click here for the announcement. Readers are instead invited to submit letters to the editor by emailing them to [email protected]. Please provide your full name and community, as well as contact information for verification purposes only.

Daily Noozhawk

Subscribe to Noozhawk's A.M. Report, our free e-Bulletin sent out every day at 4:15 a.m. with Noozhawk's top stories, hand-picked by the editors.

Sign Up Now >