Wednesday, October 17 , 2018, 2:01 pm | Fair 76º

 
 
 
 

Santa Barbara Council Shreds Lime Scooter Company, Passes Emergency Ordinance

In a mad scramble to block rogue scooter launches on the streets of Santa Barbara, the City Council on Tuesday unanimously approved an emergency ordinance to regulate the vehicles.

The vote was 6-0. The meeting highlighted Santa Barbara’s unique place in time.

On one hand, the city has courted the millennial generation, in the form of widespread new apartment approvals, embraced AirBnB’s vacation rental explosion and redeveloped the once-artistic Funk Zone into the land of experiential shopping with wine-tasting and boutique clothing shops.

On the other hand, the city is trying to cling to its core as a slow-growth, slow-change community, resisting fly-by-night trends that threaten the city’s charm and sense of community.

These values collided not with the force of an electric scooter, but that of a Mack truck, at City Hall on Tuesday.

Several council members attempted to shame Lime representative Sam Dreiman for his role in Lime’s roque launch of 100 scooters on State Street two weeks.

The scooter industry has been powered by three companies, Lime, Spin and Bird, which have raised more than $250 million in venture capital from Silicon Valley to unleash the vehicles in communities such as San Francisco, Los Angeles and Seattle.

Millennials and alternative transportation activists say the scooters help with the first- and last-mile, and get people out of their cars. Using an app, users can rent the bike and then drop it off at wherever they need to go.

Lime committed the cardinal sin of dropping the bikes on State Street without the approval of city staff. Unlike a child who ask for forgiveness rather than permission, Lime was told no by the city, and released the bikes anyway, and then inviting Mayor Cathy Murillo to a scooter event.

Councilman Gregg Hart, with an intensity that he hasn’t displayed on the council since his first run in the late 1990s, drilled Dreiman, trying to get him to admit in front of everyone that he knowingly disobeyed city staff with the rogue launch.

“It was a team decision,” Dreiman said. “We understood the city’s intent, but we hoped the data collected would help the city process.”

Councilman Eric Friedman was equally enraged by Lime. He said there was “no trust” between him and Lime.

Friedman said the company broke trust when they launched the devices on the streets after the city told it not to; then they broke trust when they didn’t work quickly to remove the bikes and work with the city afterward, forcing the staff to impound the 100 vehicles.

Then, Dreiman broke trust again when he didn’t give Hart a straight answer.

“Three strikes and you are out,” Friedman told Dreiman. “You came up here and you couldn’t answer the yes-or-no question.”

Community activist Anna Marie Gott urged the council not to bow down to the Silicon Valley-funded companies.

“It looks like the ordinance was written by someone in the scooter lobby, not someone in the city,” Gott said. “Think before you do something. Ask more questions. Be reasonable. This is none of those things. This is a knee jerk reaction to having 100 scooters dumped on State Street.

"Enacting this ordinance is ridiculous. We are rewarding bad behavior.”

Gott said if the city really wants a scooter ordinance, it should wait a year and develop something that is owner-oriented, not shared.

Councilman Randy Rowse said it didn’t make sense to be mad or surprised at Lime’s rogue launch because “this is how they roll. This is what they do.”

Rowse, however, said Santa Barbara doesn’t have to go along with it.

“We are not Seattle, San Francisco or  Santa Monica. We are different towns,” Rowse said.

Hart said he was intrigued by “mobility options,” but Lime’s behavior has left a sour taste in his mouth.

“This was a catastrophic start,” Hart said. “This isn’t the way to do business in Santa Barbara. I am not interested in the city of Santa Barbara being on the cutting edge of this. This is chaotic, unsafe and not well-evolved.”

Passing the ordinance gives the city legal teeth to stop rogue launches. Staff recommends a permit application fee of $5,000 and permit fees of $10,000 plus $100 per scooter to offset the administrative costs of implementation and enforcement.

Staff is recommending a $100 impoundment fee for bikes that are mismanaged. Typically, electric scooters are placed on the sidewalk with onboard indicators to use a phone app to pay for and use them.

The city will accept application from companies to serve Santa Barbara. Companies must submit a proposed service area plan and ensure that customers comply with the rules of road, and know how to properly ride and park the scooters.

Noozhawk staff writer Joshua Molina can be reached at .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address). Follow Noozhawk on Twitter: @noozhawk, @NoozhawkNews and @NoozhawkBiz. Connect with Noozhawk on Facebook.

Support Noozhawk Today

You are an important ally in our mission to deliver clear, objective, high-quality professional news reporting for Santa Barbara, Goleta and the rest of Santa Barbara County. Join the Hawks Club today to help keep Noozhawk soaring.

We offer four membership levels: $5 a month, $10 a month, $25 a month or $1 a week. Payments can be made using a credit card, Apple Pay or Google Pay, or click here for information on recurring credit-card payments and a mailing address for checks.

Thank you for your vital support.

Become a Noozhawk Supporter

First name
Last name
Email
Select your monthly membership
Or choose an annual membership
×

Payment Information

Membership Subscription

You are enrolling in . Thank you for joining the Hawks Club.

Payment Method

Pay by Credit Card:

Mastercard, Visa, American Express, Discover
One click only, please!

Pay with Apple Pay or Google Pay:

Noozhawk partners with Stripe to provide secure invoicing and payments processing.
You may cancel your membership at any time by sending an email to .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address).

  • Ask
  • Vote
  • Investigate
  • Answer

Noozhawk Asks: What’s Your Question?

Welcome to Noozhawk Asks, a new feature in which you ask the questions, you help decide what Noozhawk investigates, and you work with us to find the answers.

Here’s how it works: You share your questions with us in the nearby box. In some cases, we may work with you to find the answers. In others, we may ask you to vote on your top choices to help us narrow the scope. And we’ll be regularly asking you for your feedback on a specific issue or topic.

We also expect to work together with the reader who asked the winning questions to find the answer together. Noozhawk’s objective is to come at questions from a place of curiosity and openness, and we believe a transparent collaboration is the key to achieve it.

The results of our investigation will be published here in this Noozhawk Asks section. Once or twice a month, we plan to do a review of what was asked and answered.

Thanks for asking!

Click Here to Get Started >

Reader Comments

Noozhawk is no longer accepting reader comments on our articles. Click here for the announcement. Readers are instead invited to submit letters to the editor by emailing them to [email protected]. Please provide your full name and community, as well as contact information for verification purposes only.

Daily Noozhawk

Subscribe to Noozhawk's A.M. Report, our free e-Bulletin sent out every day at 4:15 a.m. with Noozhawk's top stories, hand-picked by the editors.

Sign Up Now >