Pixel Tracker

Saturday, January 19 , 2019, 7:30 am | Fair 45º

 
 
 
 

Santa Barbara City Council Votes to End Pooling of Public Comment Time

City leaders were split on proposal pushed by Mayor Cathy Murillo and passed on 4-3 vote

Councilwoman Kristen Sneddon shares her views Tuesday about proposal to stop members of the public from sharing public comment time at the beginning of Santa Barbara City Council meetings. Click to view larger
Councilwoman Kristen Sneddon shares her views Tuesday about proposal to stop members of the public from sharing public comment time at the beginning of Santa Barbara City Council meetings. Sneddon opposed the measure, which was approved 4-3. (Joshua Molina / Noozhawk photo)

Led by Mayor Cathy Murillo, the Santa Barbara City Council voted 4-3 on Tuesday to stop members of the public from sharing public comment time at the beginning of meetings.

People are allowed to extend their two minutes of speaking time by asking other members of the public to fill out slips and give their two minutes of time to them, for up to 10 minutes.

As a practical matter, the only person who regularly pools time is Anna Marie Gott, a harsh critic of the mayor, most council members and city staff on a variety of issues, such as housing, vacation rentals and public parking. 

Murillo and councilmen Eric Friedman, Randy Rowse and Gregg Hart  — all of whom have been criticized in public meetings by Gott — voted to eliminate shared speaking time.

Council members Oscar Gutierrez, Kristen Sneddon and Jason Dominguez voted against the change. 

"I just want to emphasize that at this point in our nation, it is kind of disconcerting to hear that we are trying to decide whether or not we should limit people's ability to speak freely," Gutierrez said. "I just want you all to think about that." 

Sneddon said public comment was her favorite part of the meeting, and that she was "not interested in limiting" people's speaking time because "public comment truly is democracy in action."

The idea of eliminating shared time first came up during the council's controversial retreat at a conference room 11 miles away near the Santa Barbara airport. The council members expressed concern that individuals were dominating public comment time. 

Dominguez, who also feuds with the mayor over policy issues, said it was clear what is driving the change.

"You don't want people pooling, and there's one person who pools regularly at the City Council," Dominguez said. 

Even City Attorney Ariel Calonne mentioned Gott by name twice, as an example of someone who pools time, during his formal presentation. 

Murillo said she was not retaliating against Ms. Gott, a comment that was met with laughter from the audience. 

"I can positively say it is not about any one individual," Murillo said. "I agree with Ms. Gott half the time."

Gott said she felt the council was creating policy simply to counteract her public comments.

There are people who are too afraid to speak in public, she said, but they allocate their time to her so that she can speak for them.

Gott is also a member of the Allied Neighborhood Association and sometimes speaks on behalf of that organization. 

"It is disrespectful to treat anyone who wants to participate in government this way," Gott said. "I have a right to speak, and the people who can't be here have the right to have someone speak on their behalf."

As part of its decision to eliminate shared speaking time, at Friedman's request, the council increased public comment time at the beginning of the meeting from 2 to 3 minutes maximum.

For items on the City Council agenda, the council also slashed shared speaking time to five minutes maximum.

Friedman said that he studied the city of Goleta, Santa Barbara County, and other jurisdictions, and they all allow three minutes of time, but do not allowed pooled or shared time.

"I am going to ask that we increase just the base on the general and public participation to three minutes," Friedman said. "If you are not an insider and you don't come every week and you don't know that, you should have three minutes to speak before us."

In a separate action, the council voted unanimously to require private attorneys who meet with City Council members to fill out a form stating that the did so, so the public and city attorney would have a record of the meeting. 

Noozhawk staff writer Joshua Molina can be reached at .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address). Follow Noozhawk on Twitter: @noozhawk, @NoozhawkNews and @NoozhawkBiz. Connect with Noozhawk on Facebook.

Support Noozhawk Today

You are an important ally in our mission to deliver clear, objective, high-quality professional news reporting for Santa Barbara, Goleta and the rest of Santa Barbara County. Join the Hawks Club today to help keep Noozhawk soaring.

We offer four membership levels: $5 a month, $10 a month, $25 a month or $1 a week. Payments can be made using a credit card, Apple Pay or Google Pay, or click here for information on recurring credit-card payments and a mailing address for checks.

Thank you for your vital support.

Become a Noozhawk Supporter

First name
Last name
Email
Select your monthly membership
Or choose an annual membership
×

Payment Information

Membership Subscription

You are enrolling in . Thank you for joining the Hawks Club.

Payment Method

Pay by Credit Card:

Mastercard, Visa, American Express, Discover
One click only, please!

Pay with Apple Pay or Google Pay:

Noozhawk partners with Stripe to provide secure invoicing and payments processing.
You may cancel your membership at any time by sending an email to .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address).

  • Ask
  • Vote
  • Investigate
  • Answer

Noozhawk Asks: What’s Your Question?

Welcome to Noozhawk Asks, a new feature in which you ask the questions, you help decide what Noozhawk investigates, and you work with us to find the answers.

Here’s how it works: You share your questions with us in the nearby box. In some cases, we may work with you to find the answers. In others, we may ask you to vote on your top choices to help us narrow the scope. And we’ll be regularly asking you for your feedback on a specific issue or topic.

We also expect to work together with the reader who asked the winning questions to find the answer together. Noozhawk’s objective is to come at questions from a place of curiosity and openness, and we believe a transparent collaboration is the key to achieve it.

The results of our investigation will be published here in this Noozhawk Asks section. Once or twice a month, we plan to do a review of what was asked and answered.

Thanks for asking!

Click Here to Get Started >

Reader Comments

Noozhawk is no longer accepting reader comments on our articles. Click here for the announcement. Readers are instead invited to submit letters to the editor by emailing them to [email protected]. Please provide your full name and community, as well as contact information for verification purposes only.