Sunday, May 27 , 2018, 10:16 pm | Fair 58º


Local News

Cap on Recreational Marijuana Dispensaries Discussed at Santa Barbara County Supervisors Meeting

Santa Barbara County supervisors talked about capping retail marijuana shops and limiting grow operations Tuesday, as the board got an update from the ad hoc committee that has been crafting proposed regulations for non-medical marijuana. 

Earlier this year, the county Board of Supervisors adopted an urgency ordinance to ban the cultivation, distribution, transportation, storage, manufacturing and processing of recreational marijuana.

The temporary rules also ban the selling of marijuana and marijuana products for recreational use and the growth of industrial hemp. They were put in place to allow county staff time to develop permanent rules for marijuana operations in the county.

On Tuesday, the supervisors and public got an update from the ad hoc committee, which has been meeting since March to discuss rules for cannabis operations.

Fifth District Supervisor Steve Lavagnino and First District Supervisor Das Williams were appointed to the committee, and ​Lavagnino said Tuesday that he believed the body had served its purpose.

"We have done what we can with the ad hoc," Lavagnino said, noting he also felt the public has had ample opportunity to be part of the process, which is still ongoing.

The county is developing an environmental impact report for the proposed ordinance, and the document is expected to be released for public review by the first week of October.

Californian voters passed Proposition 64 in November legalizing marijuana for recreational use, and the state is expected to begin issuing licenses to establish businesses such as cannabis clubs and pot shops by a Jan. 1, 2018 deadline.

"We didn't have seven years, five years, three years to burn on this," Lavagnino said. "If we didn't act now, we'd continue to have what we have. We have brought this as far as it can go."

He also said it was appropriate for the supervisors, who make the county's policies and land-use decisions, to take the lead on deciding the "who, what, when, and where or if (recreational marijuana activity) does happen."

The county's focus in developing cannabis regulations has been on land-use permitting (particularly for cultivation), business licensing and fees. 

Williams said he favored banning all marijuana delivery services countywide but allowing dispensary storefronts if retail cannabis sales are permitted in the future.

He believes delivery services are much more vulnerable to crime than storefronts.

"All they are is an app in the county," Williams said. "We can't effectively (regulate) a delivery service."

Williams and other board members also voiced support for capping the number of retail business licenses allowed if the county permits them at all.

Williams didn't propose a specific number but he didn't think there was a reason for a large number of storefront dispensaries in the county.

The supervisors all seemed to agree they don't want a proliferation of marijuana dispensaries and cannabis shops in the county like in Colorado, where recreational marijuana is now legal and the industry has exploded.

Second District Supervisor Janet Wolf said there are enough dispensaries available in the county for individuals to legally obtain medical marijuana, so she wasn't concerned with keeping individuals from getting their medicine, by instituting a cap.

"I am worried about having a glut … turning our communities into something we don't want them to be," Wolf said. "I can see having one in the South County and one in the North County."

The supervisors also seemed to agree that they didn't want any recreational marijuana activities, such as outdoor grows, in residential areas, with Fourth District Supervisor Peter Adam advocating for activities to only be permitted on parcels 40 acres or larger.

"I know that's not what the guys in Carpinteria want to hear," Adam said.

He said what was most important to him was that there be no on-site consumption of marijuana at any of the retail dispensaries. Adam wants to see individuals buy their product and take it home.

Third District Supervisor Joan Hartmann said she couldn't back Adam's proposal to move cannabis operations to 40-acre parcels because doing so would impact much of the Santa Ynez Valley, where people live on parcels of that size and larger.

The issue will come back to the Board of Supervisors in November, and staff will present a report on the possible economic impacts of cannabis operations in the county. 

Most discussions are focusing on recreational marijuana, but the county also has an ordinance banning medical marijuana dispensaries and cultivation, with some exceptions, in unincorporated areas.

State law does allow personal cultivation of six plants for medical marijuana. 

Noozhawk contributing writer April Charlton can be reached at [email protected]. Follow Noozhawk on Twitter: @noozhawk, @NoozhawkSociety, @NoozhawkNews and @NoozhawkBiz. Become a fan of Noozhawk on Facebook.

Support Noozhawk Today

You are an important ally in our mission to deliver clear, objective, high-quality professional news reporting for Santa Barbara, Goleta and the rest of Santa Barbara County. Join the Hawks Club today to help keep Noozhawk soaring.

We offer four membership levels: $5 a month, $10 a month, $25 a month or $1 a week. Payments can be made through PayPal below, or click here for information on recurring credit-card payments.

Thank you for your vital support.

Become a Supporter

Enter your email
Select your membership level

Payment Information

You are purchasing:

Payment Method

Pay by Credit Card:

Mastercard, Visa, American Express, Discover

Pay with Apple Pay or Google Pay:

Noozhawk partners with Stripe to provide secure invoicing and payments processing.

  • Ask
  • Vote
  • Investigate
  • Answer

Noozhawk Asks: What’s Your Question?

Welcome to Noozhawk Asks, a new feature in which you ask the questions, you help decide what Noozhawk investigates, and you work with us to find the answers.

Here’s how it works: You share your questions with us in the nearby box. In some cases, we may work with you to find the answers. In others, we may ask you to vote on your top choices to help us narrow the scope. And we’ll be regularly asking you for your feedback on a specific issue or topic.

We also expect to work together with the reader who asked the winning questions to find the answer together. Noozhawk’s objective is to come at questions from a place of curiosity and openness, and we believe a transparent collaboration is the key to achieve it.

The results of our investigation will be published here in this Noozhawk Asks section. Once or twice a month, we plan to do a review of what was asked and answered.

Thanks for asking!

Click Here to Get Started >

Reader Comments

Noozhawk is no longer accepting reader comments on our articles. Click here for the announcement. Readers are instead invited to submit letters to the editor by emailing them to [email protected]. Please provide your full name and community, as well as contact information for verification purposes only.

Daily Noozhawk

Subscribe to Noozhawk's A.M. Report, our free e-Bulletin sent out every day at 4:15 a.m. with Noozhawk's top stories, hand-picked by the editors.

Sign Up Now >