Tuesday, February 20 , 2018, 9:08 am | Fair 49º

 
 
 
 

Local News

Cost of Santa Barbara Desalination Plant Jumps to $53 Million; Council Votes to Move Ahead

Out of options amid a continuing statewide drought, the city hopes to have the facility producing water by September 2016

The City of Santa Barbara’s desalination plant has been mothballed since the 1990s, and now, its parts are so old that much of it needs to be rebuilt rather than refurbished.
The City of Santa Barbara’s desalination plant has been mothballed since the 1990s, and now, its parts are so old that much of it needs to be rebuilt rather than refurbished. (Giana Magnoli / Noozhawk photo)

Desperate and out of options, the Santa Barbara City Council on Tuesday voted unanimously to move forward with a plan to build a $53 million desalination plant to battle the worst California drought in recorded history.

"If Mother Nature could tell us what she had planned for us this winter, we could probably breather easier, but she can't," Santa Barbara Mayor Helene Schneider said.

The council awarded a $2.35 million contract to Carolla Construction Management and another $1.32 million to IDE Americas to complete the design.

IDE Americas has built desalination plants in Israel, Carlsbad, Hayman Island and elsewhere — more than 400 throughout 40 countries.

Crews are expected to complete design work in October. By November, they expect to start building. By September 2016, city officials hope the plant will start producing water. 

"It is going to be very critical in helping us meet our water supply needs," said Josh Haggmark, the city's water resources manager.

After years of below-average rainfall, Santa Barbara, like other cities throughout the state, is in dire straits over its water supply. 

This is the final year Santa Barbara will have an entitlement to Lake Cachuma water. Beginning Oct. 1, the city will get no new water from Cachuma. 

The city purchased 45 acre-feet of water already this year and plans to import that supply in the next few months. The city also expects to receive 600 acre-feet of state water next year.

"We have exhausted all options and are now standing before you with what we believe is our last option to meet our city needs," Haggmark said.

The city plans to take out a 20-year state revolving fund loan, at 1.66 percent interest, to finance the desalination plant. The cost of construction is about $14 million higher than most recently expected. The cost to operate the facility, however, has gone down from about $7.8 million to $3.1 million annually.

The Charles E. Meyer Desalination Plant has been mothballed since the 1990s. The city built the original facility to contend with the drought, but the heavens opened up and filled local reservoirs. Now the city is working to reactivate the facility, but the parts are so old that much of it needs to be rebuilt rather than refurbished. 

Councilman Harwood "Bendy" White said restarting the plant comes at great financial cost, but there are no other options now.

"This project is whose time has come," White said. 

Councilman Dale Francisco also supported the reactivation of the plant. He said it will bring great value to the people of this community and region.

"This is a source of water that we control," Francisco said. "The environmentalists have been very successful at diverting what has originally been intended for human use."

City staff left open the door of possibly partnering with Montecito to produce more water and use the desalination plant as somewhat of a regional facility. Montecito is interested in partnering with the city on the project. 

Noozhawk staff writer Joshua Molina can be reached at .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address). Follow Noozhawk on Twitter: @noozhawk, @NoozhawkNews and @NoozhawkBiz. Connect with Noozhawk on Facebook.

  • Ask
  • Vote
  • Investigate
  • Answer

Noozhawk Asks: What’s Your Question?

Welcome to Noozhawk Asks, a new feature in which you ask the questions, you help decide what Noozhawk investigates, and you work with us to find the answers.

Here’s how it works: You share your questions with us in the nearby box. In some cases, we may work with you to find the answers. In others, we may ask you to vote on your top choices to help us narrow the scope. And we’ll be regularly asking you for your feedback on a specific issue or topic.

We also expect to work together with the reader who asked the winning questions to find the answer together. Noozhawk’s objective is to come at questions from a place of curiosity and openness, and we believe a transparent collaboration is the key to achieve it.

The results of our investigation will be published here in this Noozhawk Asks section. Once or twice a month, we plan to do a review of what was asked and answered.

Thanks for asking!

Click here to get started >

Support Noozhawk Today

You are an important ally in our mission to deliver clear, objective, high-quality professional news reporting for Santa Barbara, Goleta and the rest of Santa Barbara County. Join the Hawks Club today to help keep Noozhawk soaring.

We offer four membership levels: $5 a month, $10 a month, $25 a month or $1 a week. Payments can be made through PayPal below, or click here for information on recurring credit-card payments.

Thank you for your vital support.



Reader Comments

Noozhawk is no longer accepting reader comments on our articles. Click here for the announcement. Readers are instead invited to submit letters to the editor by emailing them to [email protected]. Please provide your full name and community, as well as contact information for verification purposes only.

Daily Noozhawk

Subscribe to Noozhawk's A.M. Report, our free e-Bulletin sent out every day at 4:15 a.m. with Noozhawk's top stories, hand-picked by the editors.

Sign Up Now >