Wednesday, August 15 , 2018, 4:54 am | Fair 65º


Local News

Santa Barbara, Plaintiffs Studying Voting Patterns for District Election Lawsuit

Attorney Barry Cappello says his firm's experts have evidence to support the claim of racially-polarized voting in the city

Some Santa Barbara neighborhoods aren’t fairly represented in city government, and as a result, those residents aren’t given the same amount of access, attention or capital improvements, say plaintiffs who are suing the city over the at-large election system.

Five residents have enlisted attorney Barry Cappello to file a lawsuit this week that alleges violations of the California Voting Rights Act and calls for district elections.

Both sides, the city and the plaintiffs, are commissioning studies to examine whether racially-polarized voting exists in Santa Barbara. 

The lawsuit alleges the current system dilutes Latino votes by having council candidates elected on a citywide basis, and points to the lack of Latino representation on the City Council despite the fact that 38 percent of the city's population is Latino or Hispanic. 

Frank Banales, who was born and raised in the Eastside neighborhood, said the push for district elections is all about proper representation and having someone who will “go to bat” for that area.

“I would rather have one council member from my district than the seven up there who don’t return my calls,” he said.

If each district had a council member who was accountable to its residents and advocated for that neighborhood, decisions would be made differently, he said.

Banales pointed to the lack of street lighting — despite the area being considered dangerous and outlined as a “safety zone” in the proposed gang injunction — and the destroyed Cacique Street bridge, which is still closed after being washed away 30-or-so years ago.

If a bridge in the San Roque neighborhood was wrecked, he said, it would be fixed within six months.

“More than anything else, we want this so we can make our neighborhoods safe for all of our children,” Banales said.

Banales and three of the other plaintiffs joined attorney Cappello at a news conference Thursday to discuss the lawsuit filing.

“We don’t have a voice,” said Jacqueline Inda, who works with at-risk youth and vehemently opposed the attempt to get a gang injunction.

Cappello said his firm’s two experts for this case have data to support the claim that Santa Barbara has racially-polarized voting — where voters of a minority vote differently than the majority.

Plaintiffs say the issue of district elections isn’t new, but long overdue.

Banales pointed to a Santa Barbara County Grand Jury report from 2007, in which the jury recommended that every city change to a system with district-elected council members and an at-large mayor. No changes were made, and Santa Barbara's response letter said the city liaison positions make council members “tuned into those low income areas” like the Eastside and Westside. 

Lawsuits dealing with the California Voting Rights Act have a judge first consider whether racially-polarized voting exists and then, if it does, hold another trial to find a solution, Cappello said. 

The City Council has held several public meetings on the subject since Cappello and Banales announced the intent to sue in February. Council members considered, but rejected, putting the issue to voters this November.

Changing the election model can only be done by a majority vote or a court ruling, City Attorney Ariel Calonne said.

Now that the lawsuit was filed, the City Council could take its discussions behind closed doors.

Calonne will be talking to council members about “alternatives and options” at Tuesday’s meeting in closed session only, and the city-funded consultant presentation on demographics and voting patterns could be closed to the public.

Calonne has already spoken to Cappello several times and said the discussions have been cordial.

“I would hope that rather than this being a litigated matter it’s a data-driven process, where depending what the facts show for the voting study, we react based on that,” Calonne said.

The city’s next step is to get information back from its demographic consultant on whether there’s polarized voting in the city, he said.

The City Council expects the consultant, National Demographics Corp., to come back with results in September, based on city precinct data and election results.

National Demographics Corp. has worked with almost 200 California cities on this issue, including Anaheim, Compton and Palmdale. All three of those cities recently faced lawsuits due to their at-large election systems, the Los Angeles Times reported.

Two of those cases were settled, with the cities required to put the issue to voters this year, while a judge ordered Palmdale to impose district elections. The city is fighting that ruling, according to news reports.

Noozhawk news editor Giana Magnoli can be reached at .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address). Follow Noozhawk on Twitter: @noozhawk, @NoozhawkNews and @NoozhawkBiz. Connect with Noozhawk on Facebook.

Support Noozhawk Today

You are an important ally in our mission to deliver clear, objective, high-quality professional news reporting for Santa Barbara, Goleta and the rest of Santa Barbara County. Join the Hawks Club today to help keep Noozhawk soaring.

We offer four membership levels: $5 a month, $10 a month, $25 a month or $1 a week. Payments can be made through Stripe below, or click here for information on recurring credit-card payments and a mailing address for checks.

Thank you for your vital support.

Become a Noozhawk Supporter

First name
Last name
Enter your email
Select your membership level

Payment Information

You are purchasing:

Payment Method

Pay by Credit Card:

Mastercard, Visa, American Express, Discover
One click only, please!

Pay with Apple Pay or Google Pay:

Noozhawk partners with Stripe to provide secure invoicing and payments processing.

  • Ask
  • Vote
  • Investigate
  • Answer

Noozhawk Asks: What’s Your Question?

Welcome to Noozhawk Asks, a new feature in which you ask the questions, you help decide what Noozhawk investigates, and you work with us to find the answers.

Here’s how it works: You share your questions with us in the nearby box. In some cases, we may work with you to find the answers. In others, we may ask you to vote on your top choices to help us narrow the scope. And we’ll be regularly asking you for your feedback on a specific issue or topic.

We also expect to work together with the reader who asked the winning questions to find the answer together. Noozhawk’s objective is to come at questions from a place of curiosity and openness, and we believe a transparent collaboration is the key to achieve it.

The results of our investigation will be published here in this Noozhawk Asks section. Once or twice a month, we plan to do a review of what was asked and answered.

Thanks for asking!

Click Here to Get Started >

Reader Comments

Noozhawk is no longer accepting reader comments on our articles. Click here for the announcement. Readers are instead invited to submit letters to the editor by emailing them to [email protected]. Please provide your full name and community, as well as contact information for verification purposes only.

Daily Noozhawk

Subscribe to Noozhawk's A.M. Report, our free e-Bulletin sent out every day at 4:15 a.m. with Noozhawk's top stories, hand-picked by the editors.

Sign Up Now >