Wednesday, May 23 , 2018, 8:34 pm | A Few Clouds 62º


Local News

Santa Barbara Judge Denies Plains Motions in Refugio Oil Spill Criminal Case

The criminal trial against Plains All American Pipeline will move forward after Superior Court Judge Jean Dandona on Tuesday denied Plains motions to set aside the indictment, according to the Santa Barbara County District Attorney’s Office.

Dandona did dismiss one misdemeanor count against James Buchanan, a Plains employee who is a co-defendant with the oil and gas pipeline company in the criminal case related to the Refugio Oil Spill.

A 24-inch Plains crude oil pipeline ruptured May 19, 2015 and spilled 123,228 gallons onto the coastline and into the ocean near Refugio State Beach. 

Plains faces 46 felony and misdemeanor charges, and Buchanan now faces two misdemeanor charges.

Last month, Dandona denied Plains’ motion to move the case out of Santa Barbara County.

The latest ruling deals with “995” motions filed by Plains defense attorneys challenging the sufficiency of evidence produced during the grand jury proceedings that led to the indictment, as well as procedural issues.

Dandona’s ruling means the case is still going forward, said Kevin Weichbrod of the District Attorney’s Office, one of the prosecutors.

There is a readiness and settlement conference scheduled for March 2 and trial dates could be chosen then, or maybe at a later date to “let everyone digest the ruling,” Weichbrod said.

One of the motions that had arguments in open court was Plains’ claim that some of the charges that deal with the taking of wildlife – Fish and Game code violations from animal deaths allegedly due to the oil spill – didn’t apply to inadvertent takings like an oil spill, but the judge disagreed, Weichbrod said.

Plains All American Pipeline has pleaded not guilty to 46 charges, including four felonies and 42 misdemeanors, that allege the company discharged a pollutant into state waters, knowingly made a false or misleading oil report to the California Office of Emergency Services, failed to notify the National Response Center within one hour after confirmation of a pipeline release, and violated Fish and Game code by taking protected and migratory birds, and other animals (which died as a result of of the spill).

Buchanan, an environmental and regulatory compliance specialist for Plains, has pleaded not guilty to failing to immediately notify authorities after confirming the spill and its source.

Noozhawk managing editor Giana Magnoli can be reached at .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address). Follow Noozhawk on Twitter: @noozhawk, @NoozhawkNews and @NoozhawkBiz. Connect with Noozhawk on Facebook.

Support Noozhawk Today

You are an important ally in our mission to deliver clear, objective, high-quality professional news reporting for Santa Barbara, Goleta and the rest of Santa Barbara County. Join the Hawks Club today to help keep Noozhawk soaring.

We offer four membership levels: $5 a month, $10 a month, $25 a month or $1 a week. Payments can be made through PayPal below, or click here for information on recurring credit-card payments.

Thank you for your vital support.

Become a Supporter

Enter your email
Select your membership level

Payment Information

You are purchasing:

Payment Method

Pay by Credit Card:

Mastercard, Visa, American Express, Discover

Pay with Apple Pay or Google Pay:

Noozhawk partners with Stripe to provide secure invoicing and payments processing.

  • Ask
  • Vote
  • Investigate
  • Answer

Noozhawk Asks: What’s Your Question?

Welcome to Noozhawk Asks, a new feature in which you ask the questions, you help decide what Noozhawk investigates, and you work with us to find the answers.

Here’s how it works: You share your questions with us in the nearby box. In some cases, we may work with you to find the answers. In others, we may ask you to vote on your top choices to help us narrow the scope. And we’ll be regularly asking you for your feedback on a specific issue or topic.

We also expect to work together with the reader who asked the winning questions to find the answer together. Noozhawk’s objective is to come at questions from a place of curiosity and openness, and we believe a transparent collaboration is the key to achieve it.

The results of our investigation will be published here in this Noozhawk Asks section. Once or twice a month, we plan to do a review of what was asked and answered.

Thanks for asking!

Click Here to Get Started >

Reader Comments

Noozhawk is no longer accepting reader comments on our articles. Click here for the announcement. Readers are instead invited to submit letters to the editor by emailing them to [email protected]. Please provide your full name and community, as well as contact information for verification purposes only.

Daily Noozhawk

Subscribe to Noozhawk's A.M. Report, our free e-Bulletin sent out every day at 4:15 a.m. with Noozhawk's top stories, hand-picked by the editors.

Sign Up Now >